- Nov 4, 1999
- 24,120
- 507
- 126
Benchmark thread Spring 2014 - Summer 2016 (can't seem to edit the title)
[update]
At some point through the summer of 2016 the MW v1.02 app & it's 106.88 credit WU were given the chop, so this benchmarking run is over. I will probably start a new one with the v1.4x app & its 133.66 credit WUs. New benchmarking thread here.
So please share your new scores for old & new GPUs & CPUs alike!
Note new requirements for the benchmark :-
Please use validated 106.88 credit WU results only, they must be from the MilkyWay@Home v1.0x app (the separation mod fit ones are slower. ~20s on my HD 5850 @850 MHz).
Average of at least 5 WU times (not cherry picked please! ).
A dedicated CPU core for each GPU.
Please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory overclocks) or state 'stock'.
Please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU, otherwise it will massively increase WU time! (even if it does increase output, the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WUs so you can't 1/2 the time either).
I've decided to relent a bit on this, but only for the GTX Titan as it can't achieve anywhere near full load with just 1 WU, I will add a proviso stating this by each Titan's score (which will be derived from the total time crunched, divided by the number of WUs being crunched simultaneously. 8 WUs at once seems to be the choice so far).
For CPUs please state whether Hyper Threading (or equivalents) are enabled or not, times for both states welcomed .
It would also be useful if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any difference.
************************************************************************************
Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 MW v1.02 106.88 credit WU :-
HD 7970 (GPU 1250 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 21.02s .. tictoc
HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 21.3s ... tictoc (Win 7)
R9 280X (GPU 1185 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 23s ...... DutchDK
R9 280X (GPU 1125 MHz, RAM 975 MHz) ................ 23.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) .............. 23.12s . TennesseeTony (Cat 15.7)
R9 280X (GPU 1180 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 23.13s . khrylxtko
GTX Titan Black (GPU 990 MHz) .............................. *23.4s .. Todderbert *Time derived from running 8 WUs at once ÷8
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) .............. 23.5s ... TennesseeTony (Cat 14.9)
HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, 1550 MHz) ....................... 23.7s ... tictoc (Win 10, also a different PC)
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) ................ 24.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
HD 7950 (GPU 1188 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 24.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7970 (GPU 1052 MHz, RAM 1375 MHz) .............. 24.12s .. blub
HD 7970 GE (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM u/c 1375 MHz) .. 25s ...... DrPop
R9 280X (GPU 1070 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 25s ...... WES
GTX Titan Black (stock) ............................................. *25.2s ... Sebastian *Time derived from running 8 WUs at once ÷8
HD 7950 (GPU 1080 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 27s ...... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 28.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7950 (GPU 1050 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 29s ..... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 925 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) ................ 31.2s ... salvorhardin
HD 7950 Boost (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1400 MHz) ...... 31.2s ... Kwartet!
HD 7950 (GPU 900 MHz) ........................................... 33s ..... Tom*
HD 6950 (bios unlocked to 6970, GPU 1000 MHz) .... 34s ..... khryl
HD 7870 XT Boost (GPU 975 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz). 34.1s ... kozicka
HD 7870 XT* 3GB (GPU 925 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) . 37.5s ... Assimilator1 (*sort of an 7870 XT! See here)
HD 7950 (stock) .......................................................... 39.8s ... Rudy Toody
R9 390 (GPU 1015 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) ................ 41.5s ... salvorhardin
HD 6950 (bios unlocked to 6970, GPU 820 MHz) ...... 42s ...... khryl
HD 7950 (stock) .......................................................... 42.8s ... wayliff
HD 5970 (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ................ 43.7s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5870 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 600 MHz) ............ 46.2s ... swiftmallard
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 500 MHz) ............ 51s ..... Assimilator1
HD 5970 (GPU 735 MHz, RAM 1010) ........................ 52.6s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5850 (stock) .......................................................... 60s ..... Assimilator1
Tesla M2090 (stock) ................................................... 84s ..... fractal
R9 380 (GPU 1010 MHz, RAM 1450 MHz) ................ 96.7s ... andre
GTX 580 (GPU 815 MHz, RAM 1025 MHz) ............... 114s ..... Sebastian
HD 4850 (stock) ......................................................... 121s .... TennesseeTony
GTX 980 (GPU 1417 MHz, RAM 6000 MHz) ............. 130s .... Biodoc (Linux)
HD 7850 (GPU 1030 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ............. 139s ... usao
GTX 980 (stock) ......................................................... 145s ... Cookiemonsta (time in post wrongly labelled as 'Calculation of CPU')
GTX 780 Ti (GPU 1084-1111MHz, RAM 6800 MHz) . 157s ... DR4GOON
HD 4830 (stock) .......................................................... 161s .... TLS
GTX 970 (GPU 1114-1253 MHz) ................................ 165s .... Orange Kid
GTX 560 Ti (stock) ...................................................... 252s .... zzuupp
R9 m275 (stock) .......................................................... 290s .... waffleironhead
GTX 460 (GPU 763 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) .................. 292s .... Sebastian
GTX 680 (GPU Boost 1070-1080 MHz) ...................... 343s ... Sebastian (only 55% GPU load)
GTX 670 (stock) .......................................................... 363s .... zzuupp
GTX 660ti (GPU Boosts to 1058) ................................ 384s .... Sebastian (only 50% GPU load)
GTX 690 (stock) .......................................................... 394s .... S@NL - JBG (dual GPU card)
GTX 750 Ti (stock) ...................................................... 445s ..... TLS
GTX 260 c216 (stock) ................................................. 454s ..... Assimilator1
GTX 650 Ti (stock) ...................................................... 520s ..... fractal
GT 610 (stock) .......................................................... 1827s .... M0CZY
Current CPU statistics ~ Average CPU Time to Complete 1 MW v1.0x 106.88 credit WU :-
Intel i7 5820k (o/c 4.1 GHz) .................................. 2055s ... TennesseeTony
Intel i7 4820k (o/c 3.9 GHz) ................................... 2221s ... Assimilator1
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3 (o/c 2.8 GHz, 14 cores!) .... 3017s ... TenneseeTony
Intel C2Q Q9550 (o/c 3.6 GHz, 424 MHz FSB) ..... 3159s ... Assimilator1
Intel i7 5820k (o/c 4.1 GHz) ................................... 3221s ... TenneseeTony HT on
Intel Xeon X5570 (Turboing to 3.2 GHz) ............... 3376s ... DutchDK
Intel i7 4820k (o/c 4.34 GHz) ................................. 3597s ... Assimilator1 HT on
Intel i7 4820k (o/c 3.9 GHz) ................................... 3672s ... Assimilator1 HT on
Intel Xeon X5650 (o/c 4.1 GHz) ............................. 4130s ... DR4GOON
AMD Phenom 940 (3 GHz) .................................... 4680s ... TLS
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3 (o/c 2.8GHz, 14 cores!) ..... 5022s ... TenneseeTony HT on
Intel i7-4702MQ (2.2GHz) ...................................... 6245s ... Maxwell HT on
AMD X2 4600 (2.4 GHz) ........................................ 9780s ... TLS
Pentium D 2.8 GHz ................................................ 9937s ... SharkNose
************************************************************************************
If your wondering why I'm starting over again it's because the original (long) version of the 213.76 credit WU used for the benchmark has become only sporadically available. At 1st a short version joined it & so for a while we had both (which confused some people), then the long 1 disappeared altogether for a time! It is sporadically back but it just makes things too difficult.
Also I later found out that some people don't run the mod fit WUs (like the 213.76s) because of lower credit & some people can't run them due to hardware limitations (e.g HD 3800s). I did ask at the MW forum originally but no one said anything .
So this time I've chosen MW@H v1.02 106.88 credit WU for the benchmark, although it's shorter run times give the illusion of smaller performance gaps between different hardware it'll be easier overall.
Further info.
For reference, link to my 1st MW benchmark thread.
New thread at the Milky Way forums & the KWSN forum.
Threaded added to SETI.USA forum
Stock clocks for some of the above o/ced graphic cards, source Wiki (GPU/RAM MHz):-
HD 5850 ...................... 725/1000
HD 5870 ...................... 850/1200
HD 5970 ...................... 725/1000 (dual GPU)
HD 6950 ...................... 800/1250
HD 6970 ...................... 880/1375
HD 7870 XT ................. 925-975/1500
HD 7950 ...................... 800/1250
HD 7950 Boost ............. 850-925/1250
HD 7970 ...................... 925/1375
HD 7970 GE ................. 1000-1050/1500
R9 280 ........................ 827-933/1250
R9 280X ...................... 850-1000/1500
R9 380X ...................... 970/5700 MT/s
R9 390 ........................ >1000/6000 MT/s
R9 390X ...................... >1050/6000 MT/s
[update]
At some point through the summer of 2016 the MW v1.02 app & it's 106.88 credit WU were given the chop, so this benchmarking run is over. I will probably start a new one with the v1.4x app & its 133.66 credit WUs. New benchmarking thread here.
So please share your new scores for old & new GPUs & CPUs alike!
Note new requirements for the benchmark :-
Please use validated 106.88 credit WU results only, they must be from the MilkyWay@Home v1.0x app (the separation mod fit ones are slower. ~20s on my HD 5850 @850 MHz).
Average of at least 5 WU times (not cherry picked please! ).
A dedicated CPU core for each GPU.
Please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory overclocks) or state 'stock'.
Please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU, otherwise it will massively increase WU time! (even if it does increase output, the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WUs so you can't 1/2 the time either).
I've decided to relent a bit on this, but only for the GTX Titan as it can't achieve anywhere near full load with just 1 WU, I will add a proviso stating this by each Titan's score (which will be derived from the total time crunched, divided by the number of WUs being crunched simultaneously. 8 WUs at once seems to be the choice so far).
For CPUs please state whether Hyper Threading (or equivalents) are enabled or not, times for both states welcomed .
It would also be useful if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any difference.
************************************************************************************
Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 MW v1.02 106.88 credit WU :-
HD 7970 (GPU 1250 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 21.02s .. tictoc
HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 21.3s ... tictoc (Win 7)
R9 280X (GPU 1185 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 23s ...... DutchDK
R9 280X (GPU 1125 MHz, RAM 975 MHz) ................ 23.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) .............. 23.12s . TennesseeTony (Cat 15.7)
R9 280X (GPU 1180 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 23.13s . khrylxtko
GTX Titan Black (GPU 990 MHz) .............................. *23.4s .. Todderbert *Time derived from running 8 WUs at once ÷8
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) .............. 23.5s ... TennesseeTony (Cat 14.9)
HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, 1550 MHz) ....................... 23.7s ... tictoc (Win 10, also a different PC)
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) ................ 24.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
HD 7950 (GPU 1188 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 24.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7970 (GPU 1052 MHz, RAM 1375 MHz) .............. 24.12s .. blub
HD 7970 GE (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM u/c 1375 MHz) .. 25s ...... DrPop
R9 280X (GPU 1070 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 25s ...... WES
GTX Titan Black (stock) ............................................. *25.2s ... Sebastian *Time derived from running 8 WUs at once ÷8
HD 7950 (GPU 1080 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 27s ...... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 28.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7950 (GPU 1050 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 29s ..... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 925 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) ................ 31.2s ... salvorhardin
HD 7950 Boost (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1400 MHz) ...... 31.2s ... Kwartet!
HD 7950 (GPU 900 MHz) ........................................... 33s ..... Tom*
HD 6950 (bios unlocked to 6970, GPU 1000 MHz) .... 34s ..... khryl
HD 7870 XT Boost (GPU 975 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz). 34.1s ... kozicka
HD 7870 XT* 3GB (GPU 925 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) . 37.5s ... Assimilator1 (*sort of an 7870 XT! See here)
HD 7950 (stock) .......................................................... 39.8s ... Rudy Toody
R9 390 (GPU 1015 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) ................ 41.5s ... salvorhardin
HD 6950 (bios unlocked to 6970, GPU 820 MHz) ...... 42s ...... khryl
HD 7950 (stock) .......................................................... 42.8s ... wayliff
HD 5970 (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ................ 43.7s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5870 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 600 MHz) ............ 46.2s ... swiftmallard
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 500 MHz) ............ 51s ..... Assimilator1
HD 5970 (GPU 735 MHz, RAM 1010) ........................ 52.6s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5850 (stock) .......................................................... 60s ..... Assimilator1
Tesla M2090 (stock) ................................................... 84s ..... fractal
R9 380 (GPU 1010 MHz, RAM 1450 MHz) ................ 96.7s ... andre
GTX 580 (GPU 815 MHz, RAM 1025 MHz) ............... 114s ..... Sebastian
HD 4850 (stock) ......................................................... 121s .... TennesseeTony
GTX 980 (GPU 1417 MHz, RAM 6000 MHz) ............. 130s .... Biodoc (Linux)
HD 7850 (GPU 1030 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ............. 139s ... usao
GTX 980 (stock) ......................................................... 145s ... Cookiemonsta (time in post wrongly labelled as 'Calculation of CPU')
GTX 780 Ti (GPU 1084-1111MHz, RAM 6800 MHz) . 157s ... DR4GOON
HD 4830 (stock) .......................................................... 161s .... TLS
GTX 970 (GPU 1114-1253 MHz) ................................ 165s .... Orange Kid
GTX 560 Ti (stock) ...................................................... 252s .... zzuupp
R9 m275 (stock) .......................................................... 290s .... waffleironhead
GTX 460 (GPU 763 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) .................. 292s .... Sebastian
GTX 680 (GPU Boost 1070-1080 MHz) ...................... 343s ... Sebastian (only 55% GPU load)
GTX 670 (stock) .......................................................... 363s .... zzuupp
GTX 660ti (GPU Boosts to 1058) ................................ 384s .... Sebastian (only 50% GPU load)
GTX 690 (stock) .......................................................... 394s .... S@NL - JBG (dual GPU card)
GTX 750 Ti (stock) ...................................................... 445s ..... TLS
GTX 260 c216 (stock) ................................................. 454s ..... Assimilator1
GTX 650 Ti (stock) ...................................................... 520s ..... fractal
GT 610 (stock) .......................................................... 1827s .... M0CZY
Current CPU statistics ~ Average CPU Time to Complete 1 MW v1.0x 106.88 credit WU :-
Intel i7 5820k (o/c 4.1 GHz) .................................. 2055s ... TennesseeTony
Intel i7 4820k (o/c 3.9 GHz) ................................... 2221s ... Assimilator1
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3 (o/c 2.8 GHz, 14 cores!) .... 3017s ... TenneseeTony
Intel C2Q Q9550 (o/c 3.6 GHz, 424 MHz FSB) ..... 3159s ... Assimilator1
Intel i7 5820k (o/c 4.1 GHz) ................................... 3221s ... TenneseeTony HT on
Intel Xeon X5570 (Turboing to 3.2 GHz) ............... 3376s ... DutchDK
Intel i7 4820k (o/c 4.34 GHz) ................................. 3597s ... Assimilator1 HT on
Intel i7 4820k (o/c 3.9 GHz) ................................... 3672s ... Assimilator1 HT on
Intel Xeon X5650 (o/c 4.1 GHz) ............................. 4130s ... DR4GOON
AMD Phenom 940 (3 GHz) .................................... 4680s ... TLS
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3 (o/c 2.8GHz, 14 cores!) ..... 5022s ... TenneseeTony HT on
Intel i7-4702MQ (2.2GHz) ...................................... 6245s ... Maxwell HT on
AMD X2 4600 (2.4 GHz) ........................................ 9780s ... TLS
Pentium D 2.8 GHz ................................................ 9937s ... SharkNose
************************************************************************************
If your wondering why I'm starting over again it's because the original (long) version of the 213.76 credit WU used for the benchmark has become only sporadically available. At 1st a short version joined it & so for a while we had both (which confused some people), then the long 1 disappeared altogether for a time! It is sporadically back but it just makes things too difficult.
Also I later found out that some people don't run the mod fit WUs (like the 213.76s) because of lower credit & some people can't run them due to hardware limitations (e.g HD 3800s). I did ask at the MW forum originally but no one said anything .
So this time I've chosen MW@H v1.02 106.88 credit WU for the benchmark, although it's shorter run times give the illusion of smaller performance gaps between different hardware it'll be easier overall.
Further info.
For reference, link to my 1st MW benchmark thread.
New thread at the Milky Way forums & the KWSN forum.
Threaded added to SETI.USA forum
Stock clocks for some of the above o/ced graphic cards, source Wiki (GPU/RAM MHz):-
HD 5850 ...................... 725/1000
HD 5870 ...................... 850/1200
HD 5970 ...................... 725/1000 (dual GPU)
HD 6950 ...................... 800/1250
HD 6970 ...................... 880/1375
HD 7870 XT ................. 925-975/1500
HD 7950 ...................... 800/1250
HD 7950 Boost ............. 850-925/1250
HD 7970 ...................... 925/1375
HD 7970 GE ................. 1000-1050/1500
R9 280 ........................ 827-933/1250
R9 280X ...................... 850-1000/1500
R9 380X ...................... 970/5700 MT/s
R9 390 ........................ >1000/6000 MT/s
R9 390X ...................... >1050/6000 MT/s
Last edited: