The Bush administration was told in 2002, that torture does not work to obtain reliable intelligence information.
They were warned that "the unintended consequence of a U.S. policy that provides for the torture of prisoners is that it could be used by our adversaries as justification for the torture of captured U.S. personnel."
They called it "TORTURE!" :shocked:
Story in the Washington Post.
Note: The link in the article goes to a pdf of the actual report.
How do I comment beyond the shock level of the obvious implications? Hold onto your chairs. This isn't going away. It will only grow until we have the truth we so sorely need.
< edit >
Link updated. Full story is now on a freely accessible page.
They were warned that "the unintended consequence of a U.S. policy that provides for the torture of prisoners is that it could be used by our adversaries as justification for the torture of captured U.S. personnel."
They called it "TORTURE!" :shocked:
Story in the Washington Post.
Note: The link in the article goes to a pdf of the actual report.
Document: Military Agency Referred to 'Torture,' Questioned Its Effectiveness
By Peter Finn and Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, April 24, 2009; 5:22 PM
The military agency that helped to devise harsh interrogation techniques for use against terrorism suspects referred to the application of extreme duress as "torture" in a July 2002 document sent to the Pentagon's chief lawyer and warned that it would produce "unreliable information."
"The unintended consequence of a U.S. policy that provides for the torture of prisoners is that it could be used by our adversaries as justification for the torture of captured U.S. personnel," says the document, an unsigned two-page attachment to a memo by the military's Joint Personnel Recovery Agency. Parts of the attachment, obtained in full by The Washington Post, were quoted in a Senate report on harsh interrogation released this week.
.
.
In conclusion, the document said, "the application of extreme physical and/or psychological duress (torture) has some serious operational deficits, most notably the potential to result in unreliable information." The word "extreme" is underlined.
Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
How do I comment beyond the shock level of the obvious implications? Hold onto your chairs. This isn't going away. It will only grow until we have the truth we so sorely need.
< edit >
Link updated. Full story is now on a freely accessible page.