<< IMO, if there is no evidence of FORCE, there is no rape. I'm not sending anyone to prison for 15 years based solely on 'he said/she said'. It is a woman's duty to resist, and if she can't show bruises, scratches, broken bones, then there was no rape. >>
Spoken like a true idiot. :| :disgust:
I rarely will out and out call someone a moron, but you, sir, deserve the title in spades. So if a gun is held to a woman's child's head, with the perpetrator threatening to blow her child's head off if she doesn't submit quietly, she's not raped because she didn't physically resist? If a woman is incapacitated by a drug like Rohypnol and physically cannot fight back, then it's not rape since she didn't bust an arm fending her rapist off? So if your mother was told that unless she kept quiet and didn't struggle during the rape, the perpetrator would kill her, she wasn't technically raped? If you search in that pea brain of yours, you probably could come up with more instances where a woman would be afraid to struggle and would consider being raped "getting off easy" compared to whatever else she was threatened with.
God help you if someone you love (or God forbid, YOU) ever get raped.