Middle class has shrunk drastically over last decade

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,673
12,006
136
That doesn't prove causation. In fact, you could just as easily argue that women started entering the workplace not because they were pressured by "liberals" but because their families needed the money...


Except we're not just talking about supply and demand for labor, you also have to factor in the increasing value of that labor (as seen by the productivity numbers). Even with a larger labor force, productivity per worker went up. That should have resulted in increased wages, extra workers or no, based on the way economics "should" work.

Well, it makes more sense in the "what matches my preconceived political ideas" category at any rate. Really I don't know what the cause is, but it's definitely an issue. And it's certainly not helped by people who think those at the top need even MORE help.

Gee, that must be one of those things that's so obvious it can't be true.
 

Tweak155

Lifer
Sep 23, 2003
11,449
264
126
How on earth is $118k the upper limit on middle class? Seems nowhere near realistic. You're not hitting it large until much higher than that.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
That's typical for them, although usually it ends with them denouncing your intelligence when they are presented with facts they don't like.

Here's one floating around Facebook.

531027_490567784288449_1901069514_n.jpg


Not only is it not pointing to the right spot, the tax cuts didn't get signed into law till almost Aug 1981 but the decoupling in this one starts in the mid 70's.
Carter was president when trickle down ecomonics began in 1979...that bastard!
 

OneOfTheseDays

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2000
7,052
0
0
Yep, putting Matt and Nehalem onto the ignore list along with cybrsage was one of the better moves I've made. Makes reading threads so much easier on the eyes when you don't have to look at their constant moronic robotic right wing echo chamber responses.

They are not intelligent people, like most of their GOP brethren.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Yep, putting Matt and Nehalem onto the ignore list along with cybrsage was one of the better moves I've made. Makes reading threads so much easier on the eyes when you don't have to look at their constant moronic robotic right wing echo chamber responses.

They are not intelligent people, like most of their GOP brethren.
Why do you think the income disparity started occuring in the mid-to-late 70's?
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Yep, putting Matt and Nehalem onto the ignore list along with cybrsage was one of the better moves I've made. Makes reading threads so much easier on the eyes when you don't have to look at their constant moronic robotic right wing echo chamber responses.

They are not intelligent people, like most of their GOP brethren.

LOL, classic. That big bad scary Matt posts stuff I don’t like.

I guess the whole world agrees with you when you block all opposing facts & opinions. Just keep shoving your head under the sand. Like I keep saying, when they are presented with facts they don’t like, denounce intelligence. Now they block you so they only see the info they want to see.

:)
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Yep, putting Matt and Nehalem onto the ignore list along with cybrsage was one of the better moves I've made. Makes reading threads so much easier on the eyes when you don't have to look at their constant moronic robotic right wing echo chamber responses.

They are not intelligent people, like most of their GOP brethren.

Yeah because believing that Ronald Reagan lacks the ability to time travel makes us "not intelligent" :rolleyes:
 

Pr0d1gy

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2005
7,774
0
76
Yep, putting Matt and Nehalem onto the ignore list along with cybrsage was one of the better moves I've made. Makes reading threads so much easier on the eyes when you don't have to look at their constant moronic robotic right wing echo chamber responses.

They are not intelligent people, like most of their GOP brethren.

That's pretty much a mirror of my ignore list as well. There's no point in reading their posts. It's like reading the rantings of a 70 year old billionaire, except they're nowhere close to that point as evidenced by their constant daily posting in these threads....lol

To this day I cannot figure how people collecting disability, unemployment, etc etc etc can go around espousing right wing ideaology as if it is the holy grail.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
That's pretty much a mirror of my ignore list as well. There's no point in reading their posts. It's like reading the rantings of a 70 year old billionaire, except they're nowhere close to that point as evidenced by their constant daily posting in these threads....lol

To this day I cannot figure how people collecting disability, unemployment, etc etc etc can go around espousing right wing ideaology as if it is the holy grail.

Facts can be a scary thing. I can understand your need to block them.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
And I'm hoping you're as lonely as you sound.
Why? Do you want to hook up at the rest stop or something? :eek:

Seriously, how old are you?

EDIT:
Also, why do you think the income disparity started occuring in the mid-to-late 70's?
 
Last edited:

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,457
6,689
126
Facts can be a scary thing. I can understand your need to block them.

Yup, there are some facts of grammar that could make you look frighteningly uneducated leading to suspicions as to where else that might apply.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Yup, there are some facts of grammar that could make you look frighteningly uneducated leading to suspicions as to where else that might apply.
Damn Moonie...you think that's bad? BOTH my grammer AND punctuation look frighteningly uneducated! For the record...I blame it all on e.e. cummings. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Why do you think the income disparity started occuring in the mid-to-late 70's?

I think that's honestly a good question (and unlikely to be answered in THIS thread ;)). It's pretty clearly when the middle class started taking it on the chin in terms of their overall share of the economy. If we can figure out WHY, maybe we can figure out how to restore the middle class.

I'm not betting on it being a simple explanation though, to be honest.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
You just don't give up do you. I have persented the evidence yet you are still in denial. The ending of the Veitnam war and the energy crisis are hardly factors in the decoupling of the lower and upper classes incomes. I guess you are going to believe what you want to believe no matter what evidence is presented to you.

Of course they're factors in the decoupling. The end of Vietnam brought home an enormous number of troops & ended production of lots of war materiel. Energy providers just rode on top of the wave of increasing prices.

There were other factors, too, like increasing japanese penetration into american markets, and the first wave of serious automation. Companies who switched to importing japanese goods made more money than they had producing goods domestically, and it's not like workers got a piece of that, other than losing a piece of their ass in the process. Companies also switched their investment efforts offshore, buying in to Japanese companies.

Containerized shipping & handling made importing hugely less expensive & more efficient, killing lots of american jobs in the process. The investor class derived great benefit nonetheless.

Deregulation of the Bell system & the airlines served similar ends.

The imposition of extremely high interest rates by the FRB was great for investors, Hell for everybody else.

All of this favored wealth over labor, so Reaganomics just put more fuel on the fire. When we should have been raising taxes at the top, instituting greater socialism, we went the opposite way. The only thing that made it saleable at all was massive deficit spending. Trickledown w/o deficits is a ticket to depression.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Any day now, it'll trickle down.

It's not like they are keeping their wealth out of the economy, nah, the extemely wealthy spend tree fiddy and that should be enough to fund anyones funeral.