Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
ummm...those specs seem excessive. They look like an engineering no-holds-barred wishlist rather than something that's economically feasible.
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Howard
Who's Passions? He's been around for 4 years, and yet I don't recall seeing him...
Beats me, but he gets a 1 on his rating from me. :-D
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
ummm...those specs seem excessive. They look like an engineering no-holds-barred wishlist rather than something that's economically feasible.
Well it IS at least 1 to 2 years from being fully for-sale. So that may look like a lot NOW, but in a year when Athlon64's are 3Ghz and video cards are SUPER fast etc... it may not be that much higher then current specs style when it does come out.
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: bunker
Am I reading that diagram correctly? Three 3.5+ Ghz processors????
Not just 3 3.5ghz cpus, 3 POWER 976 3.5ghz cpus! I believe these are essentially the equivalent of dual core hyperthreaded cpus. That means 6 physical CPU's, + hyperthreading. So essentially 12 cpus if I read correctly.![]()
isn't this always done though? by the time the xbox is manufactured (2005/2006) these specs won't be overkill any more. i.e., more "economically feasible."Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
ummm...those specs seem excessive. They look like an engineering no-holds-barred wishlist rather than something that's economically feasible.
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Howard
Who's Passions? He's been around for 4 years, and yet I don't recall seeing him...
Beats me, but he gets a 1 on his rating from me. :-D
Originally posted by: theNEOone
isn't this always done though? by the time the xbox is manufactured (2005/2006) these specs won't be overkill any more. i.e., more "economically feasible."Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
ummm...those specs seem excessive. They look like an engineering no-holds-barred wishlist rather than something that's economically feasible.
=|
Originally posted by: BullsOnParade
I'm going to cry if they dont put a hdd in this one, however if they use a usb2 interface
we might yet be able to attatch a hdd to it. I hope this next gen will be as mod friendly
as the original. That ability alone has won me over.
Plus i'd guess that vpu - video processing unit not virtual processing unit.
Originally posted by: BullsOnParade
I'm going to cry if they dont put a hdd in this one, however if they use a usb2 interface
we might yet be able to attatch a hdd to it. I hope this next gen will be as mod friendly
as the original. That ability alone has won me over.
Plus i'd guess that vpu - video processing unit not virtual processing unit.
Originally posted by: ness1469
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: bunker
Am I reading that diagram correctly? Three 3.5+ Ghz processors????
Not just 3 3.5ghz cpus, 3 POWER 976 3.5ghz cpus! I believe these are essentially the equivalent of dual core hyperthreaded cpus. That means 6 physical CPU's, + hyperthreading. So essentially 12 cpus if I read correctly.![]()
I guess I'm not the only one who was floored by that.
The funny part is that, if I'm reading it correctly, it blows away any PC that is on the market or could be built on the standard budget... the problem with that is even in three years I don't think any game makers will use even a third of this power, so why waste money and jack up costs on the thing? (Unless they have some SERIOUSLY groundbreaking and monumental plans for it.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Passions
LOL XBOX2......amazing they even come up with this due to the flop XBOX was.
:roll:
Originally posted by: BullsOnParade
I'm going to cry if they dont put a hdd in this one, however if they use a usb2 interface
we might yet be able to attatch a hdd to it. I hope this next gen will be as mod friendly
as the original. That ability alone has won me over.
Plus i'd guess that vpu - video processing unit not virtual processing unit.
Originally posted by: tec699
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Howard
Who's Passions? He's been around for 4 years, and yet I don't recall seeing him...
Beats me, but he gets a 1 on his rating from me. :-D
Oh I bet he's trembling! :shocked:
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: ness1469
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: bunker
Am I reading that diagram correctly? Three 3.5+ Ghz processors????
Not just 3 3.5ghz cpus, 3 POWER 976 3.5ghz cpus! I believe these are essentially the equivalent of dual core hyperthreaded cpus. That means 6 physical CPU's, + hyperthreading. So essentially 12 cpus if I read correctly.![]()
I guess I'm not the only one who was floored by that.
The funny part is that, if I'm reading it correctly, it blows away any PC that is on the market or could be built on the standard budget... the problem with that is even in three years I don't think any game makers will use even a third of this power, so why waste money and jack up costs on the thing? (Unless they have some SERIOUSLY groundbreaking and monumental plans for it.
Actually theywill make use of it. Game makers are only holding back now because they have to please the lowest system. They want sales, so they make their games work with crappy old systems. With consoles, EVERY bit of power is eventually used. Trust me.
Originally posted by: Homerboy
i would be VERY surprised if that's accurate. current POWER4's highest clock speed is 1.6ghz, and this is from and architecture that hit 1ghz over a year ago. plus.. it's not really clear, but it looks like three cores on one chip.. currenlty they make them with 2 cores, and I would assume it would be cheaper to put in 2 of those rather than a new 3-core variation. just speculations on my part though.
