Microsoft(R) Firefox

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: beyonddc
Really? oops...
I searched "MSFirefox" and see no result before posting.

my bad

Search is broken.

Always will be :(
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: beyonddc
Really? oops...
I searched "MSFirefox" and see no result before posting.

my bad

Search is broken.

Always will be :(
But Anand posted a while back and said it would eventually be working.

ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG!!!!!!111!one
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: beyonddc
Really? oops...
I searched "MSFirefox" and see no result before posting.

my bad

Search is broken.

Always will be :(
But Anand posted a while back and said it would eventually be working.

ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG!!!!!!111!one

*Obligatory demand for peer reviewed evidence*

;)

 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: beyonddc
Really? oops...
I searched "MSFirefox" and see no result before posting.

my bad

Search is broken.

Always will be :(
But Anand posted a while back and said it would eventually be working.

ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG!!!!!!111!one

*Obligatory demand for peer reviewed evidence*

;)
Is your sig that long on purpose? Wow.

Ah, I could be wrong. =) He posted a while back and entertained some questions from ATOT. I thought one of the replies mentioned some changes in the future that would see the search function fixed.

 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: beyonddc
Really? oops...
I searched "MSFirefox" and see no result before posting.

my bad

Search is broken.

Always will be :(
But Anand posted a while back and said it would eventually be working.

ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG!!!!!!111!one

*Obligatory demand for peer reviewed evidence*

;)
Is your sig that long on purpose? Wow.

Ah, I could be wrong. =) He posted a while back and entertained some questions from ATOT. I thought one of the replies mentioned some changes in the future that would see the search function fixed.

I'm sure you are right :beer:

Also, don't mess with the sig ;)