Microsoft Interview Question

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Pantoot

Golden Member
Jun 6, 2002
1,764
30
91
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I honestly have a hunch that if there is guaranteed no slipping, then it stays put. Anyone want to back me up?

If there was slipping then the bike would stay put. The hub would be stationary and the wheel would be able to spin freely (as it slipped across the ground.) Since we are told that there is no slipping, when the point on the far end of the wheel moves toward the puller, the bike must move away as the wheel turns.
 

mzkhadir

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2003
9,509
1
76
Originally posted by: soniikboom


What if instead of just simply pulling the string...a man holding the string pulled it up to his chest. How would this affect the movement? I think this was actually the question I got.

So the guy is standing or sitting. If he is sitting and pulling the string to the chest, it would still move forward.

But if he is standing and pulling the string, the bike might get some air and the wheel would rise up a little bit depending on the force of the pull and it would go forward for a sec or less and then fall over.
 

JDub02

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2002
6,209
1
0
Forward, because the problem says you can assume no wheel slip. The wheel will begin to rotate CCW thus moving the bicycle forward until the tire rotates so that the string is on the far end of the tire
 

TuxDave

Lifer
Oct 8, 2002
10,571
3
71
Originally posted by: Indolent
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I honestly have a hunch that if there is guaranteed no slipping, then it stays put. Anyone want to back me up?

Nope, because it can roll.

But it's like two points of rotation going in opposite directions. If p exists at a height between the axis and the ground (and not at either point), it will be exerting a torque for both cases and it will be in the opposite direction of rotation for each. Who's to say one automatically wins?
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: Indolent
Originally posted by: dighn
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
when you tug on it, it exerts an equal and opposite force against the bike rim. (so, a vector heading to the left). this vector gets decomposed to the horz and vert components. we dont care about the horz, just the vert, which is pushing it down. this causes the wheel to move counter clockwise and roll the bike forward.

i have no idea if that is right, but i tried to make it sound convincing

but no slipping means there's a counter force at the bottom of the wheel, so it should turn clockwise and move backward


Correct, it will move backwards. The center of rotation is the point of contact between the wheel and the ground. Since the force is higher, it will move it backwards. No slip conditions is the key.

if there was slipping then the bike would move backwards because there would be no force of friction to move the boke forward.
 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
force P isn't important, the moment exerted about the axle by force P is what matters. resolve force P into components parallel and perpendicular to the wheel at the point of contact. the parallel component goes down and to the right, exerting a counter clockwise moment. the bike goes forward.
 

dighn

Lifer
Aug 12, 2001
22,820
4
81
here's anther way of looking at it, IF the bike moves forward, the point of contact with string would be moving left and down by vector addition. if moving backward, the point would move up and right. now tell me which makes more sense
 

Indolent

Platinum Member
Mar 7, 2003
2,128
2
0
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Indolent
Originally posted by: dighn
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
when you tug on it, it exerts an equal and opposite force against the bike rim. (so, a vector heading to the left). this vector gets decomposed to the horz and vert components. we dont care about the horz, just the vert, which is pushing it down. this causes the wheel to move counter clockwise and roll the bike forward.

i have no idea if that is right, but i tried to make it sound convincing

but no slipping means there's a counter force at the bottom of the wheel, so it should turn clockwise and move backward


Correct, it will move backwards. The center of rotation is the point of contact between the wheel and the ground. Since the force is higher, it will move it backwards. No slip conditions is the key.

if there was slipping then the bike would move backwards because there would be no force of friction to move the boke forward.


Nope, look which way the force of friction is pushing. It is pushing left on the bottom of the wheel making it go clockwise. Wheel going clockwise = bike going backward. If there was partial slipping, the wheel would move counterclockwise, making the bike go forward.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: Pantoot
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I honestly have a hunch that if there is guaranteed no slipping, then it stays put. Anyone want to back me up?

If there was slipping then the bike would stay put. The hub would be stationary and the wheel would be able to spin freely (as it slipped across the ground.) Since we are told that there is no slipping, when the point on the far end of the wheel moves toward the puller, the bike must move away as the wheel turns.

actually the bike will move backwards. it would only stay put if it was on a completely frictionless surface
 
Nov 7, 2000
16,403
3
81
Originally posted by: Pantoot
Originally posted by: TuxDave
I honestly have a hunch that if there is guaranteed no slipping, then it stays put. Anyone want to back me up?

If there was slipping then the bike would stay put. The hub would be stationary and the wheel would be able to spin freely (as it slipped across the ground.) Since we are told that there is no slipping, when the point on the far end of the wheel moves toward the puller, the bike must move away as the wheel turns.
not true, becuase the force is not purely rotational. imagine if the string was at the 180 degree position (halfway up on the left). there would be NO rotational force there, only a force to pull the entire wheel to the right. which, with slippage, would drag the wheel without spinning. the bike would still move. even though the string is not in this position, a component of its force acts like this.

edit: with friction, a force at that angle would not move the bike (would not rotate, nor would it slide)

 

Indolent

Platinum Member
Mar 7, 2003
2,128
2
0
Originally posted by: Yossarian
force P isn't important, the moment exerted about the axle by force P is what matters. resolve force P into components parallel and perpendicular to the wheel at the point of contact. the parallel component goes down and to the right, exerting a clockwise moment. the bike goes forward.


It's NOT the moment exerted about the axel. The center of rotation is the point where the ground touches the wheel.
 

Darthvoy

Golden Member
Aug 3, 2004
1,825
1
0
I think they are trying to see your analytical skills. I would answer something to the effect that it is impossible to know how the bike will move if we don't know the strength of the string. I was asked question like that in my old job because they wanted to see how my problem solving skills were.
 

Indolent

Platinum Member
Mar 7, 2003
2,128
2
0
Originally posted by: Darthvoy
I think they are trying to see your analytical skills. I would answer something to the effect that it is impossible to know how the bike will move if we don't know the strength of the string. I was asked question like that in my old job because they wanted to see how my problem solving skills were.


Nope, the part that answers this is that there is no slip conditions between the wheel and the ground. The force does not matter because no matter how hard the string is pulled, the wheel will rotate about the ground at it's contact point. it will go backwards.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
I just did a mini experiment with a bottle cap (haha) and I see what indolent is talking about
 

Indolent

Platinum Member
Mar 7, 2003
2,128
2
0
Originally posted by: Kev
I just did a mini experiment with a bottle cap (haha) and I see what indolent is talking about


:) I'm majoring in mechanical engineering and have had a dynamics course or two. This question has come up in different forms.