• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Microsoft growing its datacenter by the truckload

The idea does have some good things about it. But I think only microsoft could afford to swap out truck loads of servers at a time. Still if they want to drop off a container at my house , I can store it for them 🙂






http://news.cnet.com/8301-1080...20902-75.html?hhTest=1
Once upon a time, Microsoft used to fill its data centers one server at a time. Then it bought them by the rack. Now it's preparing to load up servers by the shipping container.

Starting with a Chicago-area facility due to open later this year, Microsoft will use an approach in which servers arrive at the data center in a sealed container, already networked together and ready to go. The container itself is then hooked up to power, networking, and air conditioning.

"The trucks back 'em in, rack 'em, and stack 'em," Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie told CNET News. And the containers remain sealed, Ozzie said. Once a certain number of servers in the container have failed, it will be pulled out and sent back to the manufacturer and a new container loaded in.

It's just one way that Microsoft is trying to cope in a world where it adds roughly 10,000 servers a month.

"You contain your infrastructure but you also contain the heat that's generated from the servers," Arne Josefsberg, Microsoft's general manager of infrastructure, said in an interview this week. "We are working incredibly hard to improve the energy efficiency of our data centers."

Only a couple of years ago, Microsoft was adding capacity one server at a time, adding individual servers to racks and taking a couple of hours to wire in each new server.

"That's way too expensive, way too slow," said Josefsberg.

Microsoft also used to lease much of its space, until it realized that data centers were going to be a very big part of its future as more and more software moved into the cloud. A couple of years back, though, it found itself running tight on capacity and bought two San Francisco Bay Area data centers in which it had been leasing space.

Over the past 18 months, though, Microsoft has been on a buying--and building--spree. The company has opened a data center in Quincy, Wash., and will open the Chicago facility, as well as another in San Antonio, Texas, later this year. A facility is due to open in Dublin, Ireland next year.

Microsoft is close to announcing yet another data center, Josefsberg said. The software maker also has signed a memorandum of understanding to build a data center in Russia.

No more off-the-shelf hardware
Gone are the days in which Microsoft settled for off-the-shelf hardware to fill its server farms. These days, Microsoft is looking for servers designed to its exact needs. It's not just that Microsoft doesn't want servers that have keyboard or USB ports--it wants motherboards that don't even have the added wiring necessary to support those things that it will never use. Such moves eliminate cost, space, and power consumption.

"We are not physically building our servers, but there is very deep engagement (with the computer makers)," Josefsberg said.

Even a 1 percent or 2 percent reduction in power consumption makes a big difference, Josefsberg said. As it is, Microsoft is trying to cram a whole lot of gear into a small space. While server racks at a Web hosting facility might have power densities of 70 watts to 100 watts per square foot, things are packed far more tightly in the containers, which might be consuming in the thousands of watts of power per square foot.

The container approach is easiest to implement on the ground floor of a facility. In Chicago, for example, it will use containers on the first floor and more traditional racks on the second level. But Josefsberg said that, though it poses some logistical challenges, the company is also considering using multiple levels of containers at other sites, including at a Dublin, Ireland data center due to open next year.
 
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
I thought Google was doing this already?

I thought Google was throwing single truckload here and there to provide data mining and caching in as many physical locations as possible.

I think Microsoft is talking about giant datacenters.
 
I saw an article on tgdaily and ars a few months ago, that sun micro were offering this already ... just order your truckload and plug it in!
 
I would love to see their electric bill each month, has to be unbelievable. I would also like to see one of these containers, the connections they use, and the cooling. wow
 
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
Here is the Sun version that LordSnailz mentioned.

I heard about this a while ago...pretty good idea for some corporations.

Plus, if you keep it outside in the winter , free cooling!
 
Was just looking at the Sun version.
Wow that is some serious power usage:

The Sun MD is packs a lot of punch into a small footprint. At only 160 sq ft, each Sun MD hosts a 12.5kW rack for network and system management equipment and seven 25kW-capable racks for servers, storage, or other equipment. This is 4-times denser per rack than a typical datacenter and makes it an ideal platform for the new generations of blade servers and other high-density equipment that many existing datacenters are unable to support due to their limited power or cooling capabilities. The high power and cooling efficiency of the Sun MD make it possible to help reduce clutter and chaos in the datacenter by serving as the ultimate consolidation and virtualization platform.
 
Back
Top