• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

News "Microsoft finally admits almost all major Windows 11 core features are broken"

That is so shocking, Maybe high ram prices will be a blessing. People won't upgrade to 11.

Win11's RAM usage is maybe 10% more than Win10's, there's barely any difference. I'm not sure what your point is here. The choice for most people who want to stay on Windows is an unsupported OS versus a supported one (in terms of security updates).
 
Last edited:
The headline is a bit sensationalistic. the scenario you would encounter this is very narrow.
 
Linked In Lunatics


In a job listing, Galen Hunt, who has been with Microsoft for the past three decades and is currently a Distinguished Engineer, confirmed that his team has an opening for an “IC5 Principal Software Engineer.” But it’s far from a simple job listing. Windows Latest spotted some intriguing details on Microsoft’s careers and LinkedIn post.

In one of the LinkedIn posts, the company’s top-level engineer says:

[Our] goal is to eliminate every line of C and C++ from Microsoft by 2030. Our strategy is to combine AI *and* Algorithms to rewrite Microsoft’s largest codebases.”

All of that might sound delusional if you realize Windows is primarily written in C and C++, but Microsoft insists everything is possible when an engineer can use AI to write more than a million lines of code every month.

“1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code”.​

A single engineer and one million lines of code every month, and you’ll have “C and C++” eliminated from Microsoft. Microsoft is actively hiring such developers who would join the company’s “eliminate C and C++ by 2030” plan as an IC5 Principal Software Engineer.

“Our North Star is “1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code,” Microsoft’s Galen Hunt wrote in a LinkedIn post spotted by Windows Latest.




 
Win11's RAM usage is maybe 10% more than Win10's, there's barely any difference. I'm not sure what your point is here. The choice for most people who want to stay on Windows is an unsupported OS versus a supported one (in terms of security updates).

Yes. Their aging hardware which has approx 10X the performance they need for daily tasks, is supported by Win10, or Win8 or 7, whatever, but not Win11 (as far as they know) and the increasing cost of hardware will delay them buying whole new (OEM) systems to run Win11 until their current system breaks and costs more to repair than it's worth - but with rising new system costs, the break even point for repairing rises too.

Security updates are mostly a myth for home users behind a router, using secure wifi or ethernet, and running a modern browser. Consider an analogy. There's been a rash of ATM thefts from convenient stores recently, and they need to update their security if they want to prevent that - but I have no ATM and do not need a security update against that vulnerability. This has been true for windows home users, for people security conscious to the point of not just muttering "security" but actually practicing it, ever since Windows UAC and firewall.

I probably ask in various forums at least twice every year for the past decade, if anyone can name a single Windows SEVEN vulnerability that the many Win7 boxes I've had online (behind a router, this isn't the dial-up era) 24/7 for years, are vulnerable to, in the extremely common home use scenarios I have. None of t hem have ever been exploited. "Vulnerable" means actually vulnerable to, just like you're not actually vulnerable to an ATM theft if you don't have an ATM. Many people savvy enough to think much about it, are more vulnerable to problems the updates themselves cause, than whatever problem the update was supposed to solve, with "update" being used interchangably with new Windows "OS version".

This is an edge case example today, I wouldn't advise to put Win7 on a new hardware build even if drivers were available, because modern browser support is running out and most people on their single main-use PC, are going to want modern browser support for years into the future - but Win10 does have that covered. I would not advise that anyone switch to Win11 unless building a new PC with a specific need for 11, or buying OEM and that kludge of an OS just came on it.
 
Last edited:
We dont disagree.

I resurrected a DELL throw-away 11 Gen Vpro Win 10 system as it was upgradable to be able to run this years upcoming Turbo Tax that requires Win 11.

The stuff Im seeing/experiencing with using Win11 is quite concerning. Im catching Win 11 monitoring and reporting all kinds of my personal stuff/activities/preferences over the networks.

As such Ive been exploring moving to a simple LINUX system on my work machines.

Im sort of really getting tired of the whole situation.
 
Wow, none of those.

Right now, I need something really simple (partly to learn Linux) so just been practising with Vanilla-Dpup (ver x86_64-11.0.11 Full BIOS).
 
I am now forced to use win11 at work and I will admit, simply installing explorer patcher makes a big difference and I almost forget I'm on 11 and not 10.
I've read that major updates can break the patcher but I havent had that happen yet.
I would still never go back to windows at home though. Linux has become so easy to install and use while being far more responsive and resource light.

Godspeed to those who give linux a try. Trust me, it gets easier and easier the more you play with it. And nowadays AI helps a lot to specifically troubleshoot.
In a years time I went from 'one big issue and I throw my hands up and say 'back to windows' to 'oh let me run this through chatgpt and see how I can fix it. Oh that was simple'
 
Back
Top