Microsoft does use linux!

jagr10

Golden Member
Jan 21, 2001
1,995
0
0
No they don't. That would be like Canon using Xerox machines in their building. Or it would be like IBM using Dell computers.
 

Soybomb

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2000
9,506
2
81
Originally posted by: jagr10
No they don't. That would be like Canon using Xerox machines in their building. Or it would be like IBM using Dell computers.

Hotmail was running *nix for a long time, I think they finally get their backend off it though. It could be knowing your enemy, or just using the best tool for the job. ...
 

Incitatus

Member
Jun 29, 2003
74
0
0
They had some BSD boxes behind hotmail.. though I think they were (or have finished) switching them out to IIS.
 

NogginBoink

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
5,322
0
0
I can assure you in no uncertain terms that Microsoft is not using Linux in production machines.

Microsoft has stated publicly on many occasions that Linux is Microsoft's biggest threat.

Now, MS may use other variants of unix for certain servers (I do not know), but I would bet body parts that they don't use Linux on production boxes.
 

Electric Amish

Elite Member
Oct 11, 1999
23,578
1
0
Originally posted by: jagr10
I bet Microsoft is trying to buy out linux to make it their own.

WTF??

rolleye.gif
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: NogginBoink
I can assure you in no uncertain terms that Microsoft is not using Linux in production machines.

Microsoft has stated publicly on many occasions that Linux is Microsoft's biggest threat.

Now, MS may use other variants of unix for certain servers (I do not know), but I would bet body parts that they don't use Linux on production boxes.

Last time I heard about it, Microsoft uses Unix-like or Unix systems to make the cd images, to protect against viruses.
 

Staples

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2001
4,953
119
106
I can see them using BSD or some other UNIX system but not Linux. I find it halarious how Linux fanboys think that MS is always using their stuff when it is BSD that Hotmail used to run on at one time. BSD != Linux, it is a lot better than Linux.
 

Derango

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2002
3,113
1
0
Oh god, I thought this was another one of those Microsoft Linux posts

Oh yea, and you can't buy out linux.
 

Flatline

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2001
1,248
0
0
Not necessarily. BSD and 'nix boxes are only as good as the person who configured them (although the BSDs do rock)
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Staples
I can see them using BSD or some other UNIX system but not Linux. I find it halarious how Linux fanboys think that MS is always using their stuff when it is BSD that Hotmail used to run on at one time. BSD != Linux, it is a lot better than Linux.

Everyone uses the BSDs. It is even my opinion that the Linux kernel possibly violates the GPL in its use of BSD, but I have done absolutely no research into this just yet.
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: jagr10
I bet Microsoft is trying to buy out linux to make it their own.

/knocks on jagr10's head

"Hello? Anyone with a clue home?"

Linux is open source, not a proprietary product like Windows. There's 50 million different variants of it out there produced by different companies and individuals (e.g. Red Hat, Mandrake, Gentoo, what have you). It's not owned by one company, so there would basically be no way that Microsoft could buy them out and snuff Linux for good.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: jagr10
I bet Microsoft is trying to buy out linux to make it their own.

/knocks on jagr10's head

"Hello? Anyone with a clue home?"

Linux is open source, not a proprietary product like Windows. There's 50 million different variants of it out there produced by different companies and individuals (e.g. Red Hat, Mandrake, Gentoo, what have you). It's not owned by one company, so there would basically be no way that Microsoft could buy them out and snuff Linux for good.

But they could possibly (depending on how Linus feels at the moment) buy the trademark to the name Linux.
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: jagr10
I bet Microsoft is trying to buy out linux to make it their own.

/knocks on jagr10's head

"Hello? Anyone with a clue home?"

Linux is open source, not a proprietary product like Windows. There's 50 million different variants of it out there produced by different companies and individuals (e.g. Red Hat, Mandrake, Gentoo, what have you). It's not owned by one company, so there would basically be no way that Microsoft could buy them out and snuff Linux for good.

But they could possibly (depending on how Linus feels at the moment) buy the trademark to the name Linux.

Yeah, but would that stop people from releasing Linux variants under a different name?
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: jagr10
I bet Microsoft is trying to buy out linux to make it their own.

/knocks on jagr10's head

"Hello? Anyone with a clue home?"

Linux is open source, not a proprietary product like Windows. There's 50 million different variants of it out there produced by different companies and individuals (e.g. Red Hat, Mandrake, Gentoo, what have you). It's not owned by one company, so there would basically be no way that Microsoft could buy them out and snuff Linux for good.

But they could possibly (depending on how Linus feels at the moment) buy the trademark to the name Linux.

Yeah, but would that stop people from releasing Linux variants under a different name?

Nothing, but there is plenty of proof out there that success relies on the marketing.
 

littleprince

Golden Member
Jan 4, 2001
1,339
1
81
Well, I typed in the ip for msn.it and it does go to the same site as msn.it
That was a win 2k box.=)