Micheal Moore wasn't that bad after all!

[sillymofo]

Iraq, a year in review.

 

[Wuffsunie]

*First in with the Wrong Forum message*

War is hell, what else is there to say?

 

[warcrow]

You're right, the rule under saddam was so much better

 

[GoodToGo]

I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

blah blah blah blah blah

 

[FrogDog]

Well that sucked. I was hoping for something that made the Bush administration look much worse!

 

[MacBaine]

I could take a bunch of pictures and put them to dramatic music too, without any context whatsoever. Is this piece of crap supposed to have a point?

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

 

[MacBaine]

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

You do realize we have a lot of vets, current servicemen, and future servicemen here, right? Ok, time for you to be quiet.

 

[brunswickite]

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

fighting in Iraq is not "fighting for freedom"

edit: becasue it has no justified reason

 

[FrogDog]

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

If I had to, yes.

I could comment further, but feel this thread is clearly turning into a "Politics and News'" thread and it's going beyond the boundaries for Off Topic.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

What what would "the reasons ... we now have" be?

 

[FuZoR]

wrong fourm! go back to P&N dang it lol

 

[MacBaine]

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

I may be there in a few years, and I am perfectly comfortable with that.

What else?

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

I may be there in a few years, and I am perfectly comfortable with that.

What else?

It's great to see your solid devotion to your country. Most of the peeps here would only get close to military experience by playing Xbox games.

 

[jadinolf]

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

You do realize we have a lot of vets, current servicemen, and future servicemen here, right? Ok, time for you to be quiet.

Thank you.

 

[FrogDog]

Originally posted by: FFMCobalt

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

What what would "the reasons ... we now have" be?

Link.

 

[brunswickite]

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

I may be there in a few years, and I am perfectly comfortable with that.

What else?

It's great to see your solid devotion to your country. Most of the peeps here would only get close to military experience by playing Xbox games.

WE ARE NOT FIGHTING IN IRAQ FOR OUR FREEDOM. Haveing pride and devotion to your country is one thing, but you do not necessarily have to become a sheep and blindly support a war with unjustified causes. I support the brave troops in Iraq, but I do NOT support the war.

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: FFMCobalt

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

What what would "the reasons ... we now have" be?

[L=http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L]]http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L][/L]

FrogDog,

Let me point out a few things for you:

1) When a person takes an oath for the military, they don't get to pick and choose the battles they go and fight. They will be provided their "orders" and it's their responsibility to follow-through with what they're told.

2) We all would hope that proper evidence would be provided. However, that will not always be the case. Have you ever made a mistake? We all do. Maybe, the Iraq one is a big one, but only time will tell.

3) When a person agrees to stand up for their country, they do it because it's in their heart. In my case, I was in during the cold war. I had enlisted even before my senior year of high school. I felt very comfortable with my decision during the whole year that I awaited basic training and then active duty military service.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

You do realize we have a lot of vets, current servicemen, and future servicemen here, right? Ok, time for you to be quiet.

I think he meant the chickenhawks who made the decision to go to war. The servicemen on this forum are merely pawns sent to their deaths.

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: brunswickite

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

I may be there in a few years, and I am perfectly comfortable with that.

What else?

It's great to see your solid devotion to your country. Most of the peeps here would only get close to military experience by playing Xbox games.

WE ARE NOT FIGHTING IN IRAQ FOR OUR FREEDOM. Haveing pride and devotion to your country is one thing, but you do not necessarily have to become a sheep and blindly support a war with unjustified causes. I support the brave troops in Iraq, but I do NOT support the war.

Well, then that's your opinion. Thanks for sharing it.

[Edit]: I really wish the mods would move this thread to Politics and News due to the nature of discussion.

 

[brunswickite]

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: FFMCobalt

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

What what would "the reasons ... we now have" be?

[L=http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L]]http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L][/L]

FrogDog,

Let me point out a few things for you:

1) When a person takes an oath for the military, they don't get to pick and choose the battles they go and fight. They will be provided their "orders" and it's their responsibility to follow-through with what they're told.

2) We all would hope that proper evidence would be provided. However, that will not always be the case. Have you ever made a mistake? We all do. Maybe, the Iraq one is a big one, but only time will tell.

3) When a person agrees to stand up for their country, they do it because it's in their heart. In my case, I was in during the cold war. I had enlisted even before my senior year of high school. I felt very comfortable with my decision during the whole year that I awaited basic training and then active duty military service.

your points are correct, but Its very sad that the leaders that provide the "orders" act with their own agenda, or make mistakes that cause thousands of brave loyal soldiers to die. Sure I make mistakes, but my mistakes Dont affect millions of people...

 

[FrogDog]

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: FFMCobalt

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

What what would "the reasons ... we now have" be?

[L=http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L]]http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L][/L]

FrogDog,

Let me point out a few things for you:

1) When a person takes an oath for the military, they don't get to pick and choose the battles they go and fight. They will be provided their "orders" and it's their responsibility to follow-through with what they're told.

2) We all would hope that proper evidence would be provided. However, that will not always be the case. Have you ever made a mistake? We all do. Maybe, the Iraq one is a big one, but only time will tell.

3) When a person agrees to stand up for their country, they do it because it's in their heart. In my case, I was in during the cold war. I had enlisted even before my senior year of high school. I felt very comfortable with my decision during the whole year that I awaited basic training and then active duty military service.

I understand that. Obviously we don't get pick which battles we fight when enrolling in the service. However, we are allowed to disagree with them. Is there a point where you disagree so much that you wouldn't fight?

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: FFMCobalt

Originally posted by: FrogDog

Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech

Originally posted by: GoodToGo
I bet half of the chickenhawk neo cons would sh!t their pants at the mere sound of gunfire and here they are, comfortably sending other people into battle.

One might call me a neocon. However, during my military service, I ensured that I qualified "expert" level on 4 different weapons - in the event the need arose to use them. Do I have any trouble with U.S. troops fighting our wars? No. Freedom does not always come freely.

So you would be perfectly comfortable if you were in the military now, going and fighting in Iraq? With all the information about the reasons for going we now have?

What what would "the reasons ... we now have" be?

[L=http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L]]http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html[/L][/L]

FrogDog,

Let me point out a few things for you:

1) When a person takes an oath for the military, they don't get to pick and choose the battles they go and fight. They will be provided their "orders" and it's their responsibility to follow-through with what they're told.

2) We all would hope that proper evidence would be provided. However, that will not always be the case. Have you ever made a mistake? We all do. Maybe, the Iraq one is a big one, but only time will tell.

3) When a person agrees to stand up for their country, they do it because it's in their heart. In my case, I was in during the cold war. I had enlisted even before my senior year of high school. I felt very comfortable with my decision during the whole year that I awaited basic training and then active duty military service.

I understand that. Obviously we don't get pick which battles we fight when enrolling in the service. However, we are allowed to disagree with them. Is there a point where you disagree so much that you wouldn't fight?

Yes. It's called prison.