• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Michael Jackson verdict decided

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I KNEW IT! he didn't do any of that... I just hope he stop freakin hanging out with kids sell neverland and start making new music.
 
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
I wish they'd cut to the media asswipes who were predicting he'd go to jail. Half of Fox News was ranting and raving how he was DEFINITELY going to the slammer.
Click to expand...

The Blonde who was on Hannity and Combes was very biased and believed he was guilty. The dark hair defense attorney they pitted her against usually ripped her apart.

Now we know which one was correct 😉
 
That done and assuming no reopenings, anyone who sends their kids to his place is an idiot! Even if he truly is Innocent, that's just freaking weird to send a child to a grown "mans" house.
 
Originally posted by: sandorski
That done and assuming no reopenings, anyone who sends their kids to his place is an idiot! Even if he truly is Innocent, that's just freaking weird to send a child to a grown "mans" house.
Click to expand...
But he has a monkey!!!

😉
 
he is still a pervert

just because he is a un-convicted child molester doesn't mean he isn't a child molester

 
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
I wish they'd cut to the media asswipes who were predicting he'd go to jail. Half of Fox News was ranting and raving how he was DEFINITELY going to the slammer.
Click to expand...

For any type of public issue, the media hot-air generators will make all sorts of statements on their opinion and indicating that they have inside info on why they are correct.

Best thing is to ignore these doom-sayers of every type and let the facts play out as they will. That is always more accurate than biased polls/pundits.

 
Originally posted by: Harvey
They'll get him next time.
Click to expand...

That is what they were saying this last time.

Originally posted by: bjc112
I can't believe they didn't get him for ANYTHING, not even the serving alcohol to minors..
Click to expand...


If it was illegal to serve to minors; a good chunk of the country could be convicted.




Maybe he will now learn that there are levels to being an idiot that cross the line in terms of public acceptance.

Doubt it. He will take this as vindication that he can do no wrong. 🙁

 
If I was the procecutor, I wouldn't have asked Macauley Caulkin if MJ molested him, i'd asked him if they "played doctor". LMAO
 
Originally posted by: BBond
Oh, this is the original thread? I should have posted this here then.

Hey, it's not like the Republican Party hasn't gotten away with the same or worse. 😉
Click to expand...

Interesting comment. As a conservative I don't believe that if someond does something wrong that it makes it acceptable for me to do the same thing. Thanks for giving us the the liberal position.


As for Michael. I didn't follow the trial and about the only thing I heard was that a movie was shown to the jury that showed a pornographic film being displayed with the boys being educated on how to manipulate each other. How was that explained or did I hear wrong.

As for the verdict. It doesn't matter what we think. While a not guilty verdict does not mean he is innocent of all charges it does mean that we must treat him as if he is innocent. I understand that liberals will never consider a conservative innocent, once charged, even if the charges are proved unfounded and fraudulent (ala Dan Rather) but MJ is not a conservative so on this issue we can all get along.

Now, I trust that every liberal will now send their children to the Michael Night Camp.

No need for a cum back.


Newsweek actually did LIE! :| People DIED! 🙁
 
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Harvey
They'll get him next time.
Click to expand...

That is what they were saying this last time.

Originally posted by: bjc112
I can't believe they didn't get him for ANYTHING, not even the serving alcohol to minors..
Click to expand...
If it was illegal to serve to minors; a good chunk of the country could be convicted.
Click to expand...

If it were? It IS illegal to serve minors! J.F.C! Do you really not know this?!
 
Man when taken into consideration how flaky the accuser and his family are I am surprised that the D.A. chose to build a case against MJ based on their testimonies.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Man when taken into consideration how flaky the accuser and his family are I am surprised that the D.A. chose to build a case against MJ based on their testimonies.
Click to expand...

i agree - that was a poor decision on their part. in all honesty i don't know if MJ really did anything sexual to these kids. what i will say is that he's crazy - he seems like he is operating at the little kid level. his world is not the same one the rest of us are living in and i guess i'll leave it at that.
 
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Man when taken into consideration how flaky the accuser and his family are I am surprised that the D.A. chose to build a case against MJ based on their testimonies.
Click to expand...

i agree - that was a poor decision on their part. in all honesty i don't know if MJ really did anything sexual to these kids. what i will say is that he's crazy - he seems like he is operating at the little kid level. his world is not the same one the rest of us are living in and i guess i'll leave it at that.
Click to expand...

Well I think that's pretty obvious. . .I mean his ranch is called "Neverland" after all. . .I will assume you know the significance of that. Far as I'm concerned he's just a Tinkerbell who fancies himself Peter-Pan.
 
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Man when taken into consideration how flaky the accuser and his family are I am surprised that the D.A. chose to build a case against MJ based on their testimonies.
Click to expand...

i agree - that was a poor decision on their part. in all honesty i don't know if MJ really did anything sexual to these kids. what i will say is that he's crazy - he seems like he is operating at the little kid level. his world is not the same one the rest of us are living in and i guess i'll leave it at that.
Click to expand...

Well I think that's pretty obvious. . .I mean his ranch is called "Neverland" after all. . .I will assume you know the significance of that. Far as I'm concerned he's just a Tinkerbell who fancies himself Peter-Pan.
Click to expand...

well - some people might just think this is him just acting out some "kid at heart" kind of BS but in actuality I think that he actually thinks he's just a kid. another thing i meant to add was that if anything DID happen the parents involved are just as guilty (maybe more so) as MJ.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top