Michael Cohen will testify to House Oversight Feb 7 about his work for Trump

[alien42]

Did the Democrats run Hillary? Yes or no.

Did Hillary not get millions more votes than Trump?

But that has nothing to do with this thread.

 

[JSt0rm]

Did the Democrats run Hillary? Yes or no.

do you even care what world your kids will live in?

 

[blackangst1]

Maybe you could link that.

Maybe you can Google that

 

[Jhhnn]

Did the Democrats run Hillary? Yes or no.

And the double down. I think we need a But Hillary! thread where we can direct such comments when they have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

 

[blackangst1]

Did Hillary not get millions more votes than Trump?

But that has nothing to do with this thread.

She lost the presidential election with the laws we've had in place for hundreds of years.

But that has nothing to do with this thread.

 

[blackangst1]

do you even care what world your kids will live in?

I don't have kids.

 

[blackangst1]

And the double down. I think we need a But Hillary! thread where we can direct such comments when they have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

You fucking opened the door asshat

 

[glenn1]

And the double down. I think we need a But Hillary! thread where we can direct such comments when they have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

No, the double down would be Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. Two guys who wouldn't be there if Dems hadn't stupidly run Hillary.

 

[Jhhnn]

Maybe you can Google that

It may a little hard to find given that I have no idea what you're talking about. If you're going to tell us Pelosi said something you really should say what it is, not what you interpret it to be.

 

[Jhhnn]

You fucking opened the door asshat

I was not the first to reference Hillary in this thread.

 

[Jhhnn]

No, the double down would be Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. Two guys who wouldn't be there if Dems hadn't stupidly run Hillary.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with today's hearing, the topic of this thread.

 

[blackangst1]

It may a little hard to find given that I have no idea what you're talking about. If you're going to tell us Pelosi said something you really should say what it is, not what you interpret it to be.

Christ you're lazy

 

[blackangst1]

I was not the first to reference Hillary in this thread.

No but you participated, why can't i without you duverting? Did the Democrats run Hillary yes or no

 

[glenn1]

No but you participated, why can't i without you duverting? Did the Democrats run Hillary yes or no

It must be a deep source of cognitive dissonance to Dems knowing if they had run basically anyone else there would have been no "tax cut for the rich," no 2 extra GOP selected SCOTUS judges, and probably never heard from Trump again after Nov 2016.

 

[JSt0rm]

Christ you're lazy

Yeah the smear was people talking about his sexual assault. Not the sexual assault.

 

[Jhhnn]

Christ you're lazy

About that-

As a longer clip and transcript clearly show, Pelosi was calling out Republicans for conducting wrap-up smear campaigns, not touting the phenomenon as a go-to strategy for Democrats:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nancy-pelosi-wrap-up-smear/

Maybe you're just gullible.

 

[nutxo]

You guys act like Trump is the worst mother fucker on the planet,. maybe but I see politicians this way.

Still clinging to the belief that Hillary is just as bad as Trump, eh?

Malcom X said something to this effect. The republicans are wolves that come at you with teeth bared. The democrats are foxes, they make you think you can trust them until they eat you. Now we have fox in the whitehouse pretending to be a wolf.If Trump hadnt run for president hillary would have been sucking him off to get him to run fundraisers for her.

I remember and interview with Trump in the 80's where he talked about being american royalty and the secret to a happy marriage was for his wife to shut up. Then there is this https://www.livemint.com/rf/Image-6...ed/car1-U10141249868P3C--621x414@LiveMint.jpg . I wouldn't trust this guy as far as I could throw him.

Bill Clinton was a rapist and a misogynistic adulterer . Hillary was complicit. A pathetic enabler, a massive failure and crook in whitewater. Then there was the whole murder thing that was "disproved" . Somehow they went into the whitehouse with a few 100k and left millionaires.

It's fucking disgusting when people take political sides instead of realizing that career politicians are the fucking problem.

 

[blackangst1]

Yeah the smear was people talking about his sexual assault. Not the sexual assault.

It's a tactic that could be used for pretty much everything. You're an idiot if you think otherwise.

 

[blackangst1]

About that-



https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nancy-pelosi-wrap-up-smear/

Maybe you're just gullible.

Or maybe you are for thinking Democrats don't use the same tactic

And congrats for learning to Google for yourself!

 

[Jhhnn]

It must be a deep source of cognitive dissonance to Dems knowing if they had run basically anyone else there would have been no "tax cut for the rich," no 2 extra GOP selected SCOTUS judges, and probably never heard from Trump again after Nov 2016.

It must be deeply comforting to you to blame Dems for what the GOP has wrought in Trump, the world's greatest con artist. Cohen is trying to tell people the same thing Dems have been saying from the beginning, right here-

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...suffer_the_same_consequences_i_am_facing.html

Trump's corruption is more contagious than measles & it may destroy us all.

 

[Jhhnn]

Or maybe you are for thinking Democrats don't use the same tactic

And congrats for learning to Google for yourself!

No reflection at all on the revelation that you've been chumped. Both sides! Blah, blah, blah.

 

[blackangst1]

No reflection at all on the revelation that you've been chumped. Both sides! Blah, blah, blah.

You're not the sharpest tool in the lefts shed, but you are a tool.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

She lost to him, isn't that prima facie evidence that she was a terrible candidate? Losing to the most unpopular nominee to ever run would seem by definition you were a terrible candidate.




I'm not saying they shouldn't conduct hearings but ultimately they won't lead to removal of Trump from office as Nixon would have been for Watergate. if your point is simply to have hearings as a political spectacle to say one more time "see we told you Trump was a crook!" then have at it. Good luck with impeachment and actually getting the Senate supermajority to convict, I guess everyone needs a pointless project they'll never finish.

Can any Canidate win against another canidate that is backed by a foreign super power who had nearly limitless cash, limitless hacking skill, isn’t bound to ethics or pesky election laws?

 

[Jhhnn]

You're not the sharpest tool in the lefts shed, but you are a tool.

You accepted falsehood as fact but I'm the tool for pointing it out. I mean, wtf kind of source is some random youtube video, anyway?

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

That's what Democrats said about 2018 and their blue wave... Which turned into a blue trickle.

The Dems weren't supposed to take the House in the numbers they did yet they now run that part of Congress. They should have done worse in the Senate as they were far more vulnerable than the Reps.

None of that changes what NY has already said about Trump, his family operations. Where exactly is the faux Trump charity he was abusing? He no longer has it.

Maybe you aren't familiar with NY, but Trump has no power, no influence and the rest of the nation can go screw itself. You might be inclined to say otherwise but I suggest you have a good long look at what happened to the criminals who tested the system. What's going to happen, Congressional Republicans have a fit? Pence going to pardon him? Yes to the first and no to the second.

What we saw today with Trump and Cohen is completely irrelevant because Congress will be irrelevant. Get used to that reality.