The British monarchy isn't relevant at all to this topic and yet you brought it up. Maybe the real reason you don't want to discuss the comparative economies is because you'd have to admit Brits are much better off than Mexicans despite their royalty.
It shouldn't be that difficult. I had it in a sarcastic statement. I didn't invite a discussion on it.
There is more to discuss than economies (and let's not forget that the British economy was built by the deaths of hundreds of millions or billions of people slaughtered for the Empire). I would argue that the limeys are not better off than Mexicans. It's better to live and die a human than as a peasant.
Do you think that should not be factored into the analysis?
Last edited:
