CW: You do not understand that you assume that what you feel is truth and what others know is a lie.
M: I know nothing and I think you think you do. Just for example, here you express an opinion but what you don't do is offer any proof. You say what I do is assume what I feel is the truth but it's just you making noise. Where is your proof you are right? Where is your case? You see what I mean. You just say stuff and that means nothing.
CW: This assumption is the downfall of your entire philosophy.
M: I make no assumption you have established as a reality. I have no philosophy. Again you just make noise.
CW: Since you can't tell me what bigotry means, you cannot see that what I am saying is obviously true.
M: I told you exactly what bigotry is:
"So a bigot, my dear Sir, is somebody who hold unexamined assumptions, ideas and thoughts, dead memories of the past, some one who feels need, somebody who clings to ideas about the absolute, somebody who believes in good and evil. Where there is the feeling of need, there is the motivation to justify, to strive and do battle when everything is already absolutely perfect as it is."
I told you I would give you a real definition. The seeing problem is with you. If I can't see what your saying it's because you don't say anything, you just make noise.
CW: You are simply a bigot in defense of your own ideas which exclude all other ideas by default.
M: I know nothing. I have no ideas. If you do, and you don't, you simply need to say what they are and give the proof.
CW: Since you are a bigot, you have never considered this possibility.
M: Sorry, I know I know nothing and found out when I died to bigotry.
CW: You do not know what my ideas are, yet you condemn them out of hand because you're sure that they are different from your own. The irony is delicious.
M: I condemn nothing and I have no compunction to be sure. I chose to speak to you in tone I felt you used on others. I know nothing and for me there is no such thing as gain. I am indifferent to what you think. There is nothing for me to defend. For my truth I paid everything. I let go of everything you believe. You are as familiar to me as my own hand. And I'm fully open to hearing your ideas.
A mind that functions at a higher level of consciousness is conscious of things you can't see, just as a three dimensional being is a total mystery to somebody living on a line. If higher consciousness collapses duality producing a unity of all things, a true or higher reality, from that perspective, perhaps you can see, all ideas, thoughts, theories, philosophies, religions, etc. are only delusions produced by split minds. And if you are a duality thinker, and that is a known, then it is axiomatic that everything you believe is a lie.
M: I know nothing and I think you think you do. Just for example, here you express an opinion but what you don't do is offer any proof. You say what I do is assume what I feel is the truth but it's just you making noise. Where is your proof you are right? Where is your case? You see what I mean. You just say stuff and that means nothing.
CW: This assumption is the downfall of your entire philosophy.
M: I make no assumption you have established as a reality. I have no philosophy. Again you just make noise.
CW: Since you can't tell me what bigotry means, you cannot see that what I am saying is obviously true.
M: I told you exactly what bigotry is:
"So a bigot, my dear Sir, is somebody who hold unexamined assumptions, ideas and thoughts, dead memories of the past, some one who feels need, somebody who clings to ideas about the absolute, somebody who believes in good and evil. Where there is the feeling of need, there is the motivation to justify, to strive and do battle when everything is already absolutely perfect as it is."
I told you I would give you a real definition. The seeing problem is with you. If I can't see what your saying it's because you don't say anything, you just make noise.
CW: You are simply a bigot in defense of your own ideas which exclude all other ideas by default.
M: I know nothing. I have no ideas. If you do, and you don't, you simply need to say what they are and give the proof.
CW: Since you are a bigot, you have never considered this possibility.
M: Sorry, I know I know nothing and found out when I died to bigotry.
CW: You do not know what my ideas are, yet you condemn them out of hand because you're sure that they are different from your own. The irony is delicious.
M: I condemn nothing and I have no compunction to be sure. I chose to speak to you in tone I felt you used on others. I know nothing and for me there is no such thing as gain. I am indifferent to what you think. There is nothing for me to defend. For my truth I paid everything. I let go of everything you believe. You are as familiar to me as my own hand. And I'm fully open to hearing your ideas.
A mind that functions at a higher level of consciousness is conscious of things you can't see, just as a three dimensional being is a total mystery to somebody living on a line. If higher consciousness collapses duality producing a unity of all things, a true or higher reality, from that perspective, perhaps you can see, all ideas, thoughts, theories, philosophies, religions, etc. are only delusions produced by split minds. And if you are a duality thinker, and that is a known, then it is axiomatic that everything you believe is a lie.
Facebook
Twitter