Mercury in tuna, safe to eat?

GoodRevrnd

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
6,801
581
126
Can someone tell me if the fast fishes (tuna, swordfish, etc.) are naturally higher in mercury, or if they just are more prone to absorb it.

Anyway, as far as dangers go... as long as you don't eat such fish more than once a week you should be fine (so I've read).
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
canned tuna has less than swordfish, shark, etc. I think the FDA recos no more than one serving/week of that crap for pregnant women. I personally eat 4-5 cans tuna/week. Everything can screw your body up these days, so fvck it.
 

Lars

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2001
3,379
0
0
If you don't eat too much tuna it should be safe. I think I might eat about two cans of tuna each week.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
It is safe. That story you saw was pure junk. They made it up. Check out the Junk Science archives.
 

C'DaleRider

Guest
Jan 13, 2000
3,048
0
0
Originally posted by: gsellis
It is safe. That story you saw was pure junk. They made it up. Check out the Junk Science archives.

BS!

All fish contains some level of mercury. That is a scientific verifiable fact. What levels of mercury is safe is another thing.....level in the flesh and amount eaten.

Nearly all fish contain trace amounts of methylmercury. How does this element get into our fish supply? Mercury occurs both naturally and from man-made sources. Some of it can be traced to coal-burning power plants. Smokestacks release toxic mercury emissions which rain down into rivers, lakes, and oceans. Bacteria convert the mercury to a form that's easily absorbed by insects and other small organisms. Mercury moves up the food chain as small fish eat the small organisms and big fish eat the smaller fish. The highest concentrations accumulate in large predators such as shark, swordfish and tuna...some of America's favorite fish.

Guess since it's a made-up thing, those Japanese living in Minamata Bay were just faking their brain damage and deaths, eh?

Until the 1950's, the problems that can occur with excessive mercury intake were not well-known. However, at that time, an epidemic hit fishermen and their families in villages on Japan's Minamata Bay. People whose diet was primarily seafood showed signs of brain damage; some were even fatally stricken with disease and seizures. The investigation linked the health problems to methylmercury poisoning from a local chemical plant that was discharging organic mercury into the bay. The villagers were getting sick from eating the fish that had absorbed the mercury.

Read about it here.

The essential problem with mercury ingestion is that it is cumulative....our bodies do not eliminate mercury once it's taken in. Interestingly, the report the FDA put out in 1991 that established guidelines for fish intake for pregnant women and children, the vulnerable segments of the population because of developing nervous systems in the unborn fetuses and children, have turned out to be based on low figures of mercury in tuna, etc.

A new study done just a couple of months ago demonstrated there is higher levels of mercury in the four fish species than first thought.....sometimes significantly.

You can see those figures here.

The FDA downplays much of this, but while the majority of the population is probably not very affected by this, it's probably fairly safe to eat tuna, et al. It's the vulnerable segments of the population that are at hightened risk....

And if the mercury level research is just made-up crap, I suppose the lead problem and asbestos problem are, too.
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Originally posted by: GoodRevrnd
Can someone tell me if the fast fishes (tuna, swordfish, etc.) are naturally higher in mercury, or if they just are more prone to absorb it.

Any high level predator is going to have high mercury levels. They get the cumulative dose of their prey's mercury, their prey's prey's mercury, etc, etc, etc.

Viper GTS
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
I eat a can of tuna everyday (almost) and I'm not dead yet... :D
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
The EWG has a record of going off on faulty data, especially on pesticides. So, take any study with a grain of salt.

Junk Science report on Mercury warning

Remember, it is the dose that makes the poison. Otherwise, SOTS (Stamp Out The Sun), as any level of radiation is harmful.
 

CraigRT

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
31,440
5
0
I love Tuna, I have heard the same thing, and I don't really care, cause as Skoorb said, EVERYTHING is freaking bad for you thesedays.
whooooo caaaaaaaares!
 

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
2
71
Are there any cases where mercury has been known to harm people of a non-pregnant status?
 

preCRT

Platinum Member
Apr 12, 2000
2,340
123
106
Just buy Chicken of the Sea brand, everyone knows there is no mercury in poultry ;)
 

Lager

Diamond Member
May 19, 2003
9,433
0
0
Just keep eating Syringer. Nothing will happen to you. Go buy more, eat more.
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
Eat enough of it you'll be able to take your own temperature.
 

wake

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
522
0
0
Originally posted by: Syringer
Are there any cases where mercury has been known to harm people of a non-pregnant status?

Socieity of Oral Medicine and Toxicology http://home.iprimus.com.au/asomat/Frame/Main.htm

Symptoms of Chronic Mercury Poisoning http://www.mercurypoisoned.com/symptoms.html

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome / Mercury http://www.cfspages.com http://www.cfspages.com

I'm convinced mercury can cause problems , but it is difficult to prove even when a significant amount exists in your teeth. Just not sure that eating tuna is enough to cause any of these problems.




 

crt1530

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2001
3,194
0
0
Tuna has mercury. Farmed salmon has pcb's. Beef and pork have bad fats. Chicken can give you salmonella. It's a jungle out there.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: crt1530
Tuna has mercury. Farmed salmon has pcb's. Beef and pork have bad fats. Chicken can give you salmonella. It's a jungle out there.

You need to go read some of the Junk Science stuff. You will feel a little better. PCBs in salmon - covered and discussed. Trans-fats, covered. The only one listed that is a definite concern is the salmonella.
 

Train

Lifer
Jun 22, 2000
13,583
80
91
www.bing.com
eat all the Tuna you want, ill bet you $100 you never suffer a symptom of mercury posioning.

Funny how if you read the junk science archives, they point out that the authors of all those "omg fish is bad dont eat it!" stories are funded by orgs such as PEW and PETA to name a few.

I work for a seafood company, this is serious to us. And i can tell you that toxins in fish (either wild or farmed) are at thier lowest levels in over 20 years, and continue to decline.