Mercedes C32: The 354hp Hatchback!

[GTaudiophile]

0-60 in 5.2 seconds ain't too bad!

 

[b0mbrman]

It looks pretty damn great (seen 3 on the road so far) too 🙂

0-60 in 5.2 seconds ain't too bad!

 

[N8Magic]

0-60 in 5.2 seconds ain't too bad!

Fixed link for the lazy.

 

[Rkonster]

Hmmm. I want! Along with the E55, SL55, S55, and CL55. Oh wait, nm, I cannot afford any of them. 🙁

 

[Jerboy]

Originally posted by: N8Magic
0-60 in 5.2 seconds ain't too bad!

Fixed link for the lazy.

Ark.. I prefer standard E55. That C32 is so ass-high. Looks kind of like a truck loading ramp.

 

[JSang]

looks nice in front but i dont like the back
for an extra 20 grand go e55 =)

 

[N8Magic]

BTW, even though I like the CL600 better, that car is still :Q!

 

[DonaldC]

Can't get past the looks of the C Class. Go for the E55.

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: JSang
looks nice in front but i dont like the back
for an extra 20 grand go e55 =)

Heh heh...just 20 grand? 🙂

BTW, the Mercedes does look pretty keen but when I saw it on the street, I expected it to be Mercedes' crossover car--one to appeal to younger people with some money...$50k sure does put it out of range of a lot of youngsters though 🙂

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

I guess $50K for a barn-burning Mercedes hatchback is no less reasonable than $40K for a 270 bhp Passat.

 

[DaLeroy]

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
0-60 in 5.2 seconds ain't too bad!

Is that 354hp at the flywheel or rear wheels? Article doesn't seem to say....

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

Originally posted by: DaLeroy

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
0-60 in 5.2 seconds ain't too bad!

Is that 354hp at the flywheel or rear wheels? Article doesn't seem to say....

It has to be at the flywheel - there is no way this thing has 354 bhp at the wheels. That is Viper territory.

 

[SirDante]

I parked next to one here at the library (non AMG version of course) and lord is it ugly. IMHO.