Proletariat
Diamond Member
- Dec 9, 2004
- 5,614
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: mugs
A draft is highly unlikely, but how does that make it any less of a double standard?![]()
And men who volunteer to go to war in this country go into combat. Women are just in support roles behind the front lines and are rarely in a combat situation. That's another double standard. But I guess that's good for the men, since women don't have the same physical requirements for military service (another double standard).
But at least we men are less likely to contract HIV through unprotected sex than a woman is. :thumbsup:
(a double standard in nature that favors men)
I wish I could find the news article but I remember reading about this liberal female senator who was trying to push a bill that would have forced the military to lower physical standards for women in order for them to qualify for certain military positions. The positions she was primarily targeting were those of elite special forces (the trained killers). Fortunately her bill was shot down but she still make me sick.
IMO: I have no problem with a woman who wants to be a fighter pilot, tanker, or a helicopter pilot. These battlefield positions are not as heavily dependant on physical endurance and strength as those of a front line soldier.
Hmm, that's odd, I'm pretty sure federal law is that the mother and the father have to be granted 12 weeks of paternity leave. It's under the FMLA; the employer has to grant it whether they like it or not and it can't have any affect on any sort of employee review or termination. However, if you don't have sick leave or vacation leave to cover it, they don't have to pay the employees salary.Originally posted by: Injury
While I understand the psychological reasons behind a mother being with her child after birth, why do most companies not grant men some "maternity" leave?
I know SOME do... for instance, the Cincinnati division of police gave my uncle about 12 weeks of leave... which was actually more than my aunt got!
Originally posted by: ScoobMaster
I don't see this angle brought up often, but it ACTUALLY happened to a good friend of mine.
This is the "opposite" end of the current Father's rights to abortion debate that is taking place.
Consider this scenario:
An unmarried couple has consensual sex resluting in an unexpected pregnancy. The woman does not want the child and makes the decision (on her own) to abort. The man, on the other hand, wants to take full responsibility and wishes to have the child born and take full custody and raise him/her. He legally has NO SAY in the matter, even though it is his offspring.
Originally posted by: fitzov
Originally posted by: ScoobMaster
I don't see this angle brought up often, but it ACTUALLY happened to a good friend of mine.
This is the "opposite" end of the current Father's rights to abortion debate that is taking place.
Consider this scenario:
An unmarried couple has consensual sex resluting in an unexpected pregnancy. The woman does not want the child and makes the decision (on her own) to abort. The man, on the other hand, wants to take full responsibility and wishes to have the child born and take full custody and raise him/her. He legally has NO SAY in the matter, even though it is his offspring.
Well, what if the woman was raped, would the rapist have a say in the matter? It's his offspring, right?
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: fitzov
Originally posted by: ScoobMaster
I don't see this angle brought up often, but it ACTUALLY happened to a good friend of mine.
This is the "opposite" end of the current Father's rights to abortion debate that is taking place.
Consider this scenario:
An unmarried couple has consensual sex resluting in an unexpected pregnancy. The woman does not want the child and makes the decision (on her own) to abort. The man, on the other hand, wants to take full responsibility and wishes to have the child born and take full custody and raise him/her. He legally has NO SAY in the matter, even though it is his offspring.
Well, what if the woman was raped, would the rapist have a say in the matter? It's his offspring, right?
Reading comprehension FTW.![]()