yes.
Again in the age of designer drugs, billions of dollars in medical research and people with biotech phds, inhaling smoke from burning plant is the medication? That's why it sounds like one of those remedies i heard form my grandma.
In many cases, yes. Say you have a sleeping problem..
Side effects of Ambien:
Ambien
All medicines may cause side effects, but many people have no, or minor, side effects. Check with your doctor if any of these most COMMON side effects persist or become bothersome when using Ambien:
Diarrhea; dizziness; drowsiness (including daytime drowsiness); "drugged" feeling; dry mouth; headache; nausea; nose or throat irritation; sluggishness; stomach upset.
Seek medical attention right away if any of these SEVERE side effects occur when using Ambien:
Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the hands, legs, mouth, face, lips, eyes, throat, or tongue; unusual hoarseness); abnormal thinking; behavior changes; chest pain; confusion; decreased coordination; difficulty swallowing or breathing; fainting; fast or irregular heartbeat; hallucinations; memory problems (eg, memory loss); mental or mood changes (eg, aggression, agitation, anxiety, depression); severe dizziness; shortness of breath; suicidal thoughts or actions; vision changes.
Ambien CR Extended-Release Tablets
All medicines may cause side effects, but many people have no, or minor, side effects. Check with your doctor if any of these most COMMON side effects persist or become bothersome when using Ambien CR Extended-Release Tablets:
Dizziness; drowsiness (including daytime drowsiness); "drugged" feeling; dry mouth; headache; muscle aches; nausea; nose or throat irritation; sluggishness; stomach upset.
Seek medical attention right away if any of these SEVERE side effects occur when using Ambien CR Extended-Release Tablets:
Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the hands, legs, mouth, face, lips, eyes, throat, or tongue; unusual hoarseness); abnormal thinking; behavior changes; chest pain; confusion; decreased coordination; difficulty swallowing or breathing; fainting; fast or irregular heartbeat; hallucinations; memory problems (eg, memory loss); mental or mood changes (eg, aggression, agitation, anxiety, depression); severe dizziness; shortness of breath; suicidal thoughts or actions; vision changes.
Now Side effects of Marijuana:
Marijuana's side effects are short term and are Problems with memory and learning, Distorted perception, Difficulty with thinking and problem solving, Loss of coordination, Increased heart rate, Anxiety, paranoia and panic attacks
Yeah...you can deny it if you want to but that is just in comparison to one medicine. If you take a bunch of pills that MJ can treat you could be saving your life in the long run.
What peer reviewed study are you quoting exactly for the side effects of THC when used for insomnia?
That is EXACTLY my problem - if it was actually legalized, pharma would spend money on research to find out all the true side effects, so they don't get sued by the users (or nailed by FDA). Right now there's no research and people are smoking weed because there is a handful of peer reviewed studies that tested THC extract on people. That's why it's all around stupid. It's not like when you buy a bag of weed from the dispensry, you'll get the dosage, side effects and other info with it.
Does this "medical marijuana card" prevent the police from arresting you or issuing a ticket if they find a joint or two during a traffic stop?
A) I pulled the side effects for both from drugs.com, which is a reliable source for medication information.
I don't think you even understand the full mechanics (no offense) of MJ anyway as you keep referring to THC extract and the like when we already have a pill that is an attempt at doing that exact thing (marinol) which is replicating the THC but go to any site for reviews of the medicine and side effects / side effect strength and you will see that it just is not the same. Other components in MJ make it a perfect blend.
I don't know why you think that because something was made in a lab it is automatically a better choice.
All the side effects of MJ are quite obvious and it has NEVER been the cause of death for a single (or married, hah) person. It is one of the SAFEST medicines at our disposal and should be used in place of pharmaceuticals in as many cases as beneficial.
No one has ever died from MJ. You get some tar, a little smoke related crud, nothing that is going to seriously hurt you. It is the best alternative to many medicines on the market.
It only looks better versus all those other examples you posted.![]()
I saw the documentary on medical pot and almost everyone was buying it to smoke. There were a few clips where they mentioned edibles but most of it was being smoked. What I don't understand is why they don't put it into a pill form. I'd probably try it then (can't stand smoking).![]()
Mark Kleiman, director of the Drug Policy Analysis Program at UCLA's School of Public Affairs said of Marinol, "It wasn't any fun and made the user feel bad, so it could be approved without any fear that it would penetrate the recreational market, and then used as a club with which to beat back the advocates of whole cannabis as a medicine."
Well post up some peer reviewed studies that show smoking weed is helpful for x.
Again I'm not arguing that weed should be schedule 1 or that THC has no medical benefits. My point is simply that smoking anything is a retarded way to go about doing it. There will be virtually no pharma research so long it's shedule 1 and "better smoking weed than FDA approved drugs" is hardly a rational argument to base public policy on (but hey, it will get passed via proposition)
Again in the age of designer drugs, billions of dollars in medical research and people with biotech phds, inhaling smoke from burning plant is the medication? That's why it sounds like one of those remedies i heard form my grandma.
Again in the age of designer drugs, billions of dollars in medical research and people with biotech phds, inhaling smoke from burning plant is the medication? That's why it sounds like one of those remedies i heard form my grandma.
* Very common (>10% of patients): dizziness, drowsiness
* Common (1–10% of patients): visual disturbance (including blurred vision, diplopia), ataxia, dysarthria, tremor, lethargy, memory impairment, euphoria, constipation, dry mouth, peripheral edema, loss or decrease of libido, erectile dysfunction, weight gain
* Infrequent (0.1–1% of patients): depression, confusion, agitation, hallucinations, myoclonus, hypoaesthesia, hyperaesthesia, tachycardia, excessive salivation, sweating, flushing, rash, muscle cramp, myalgia, arthralgia, urinary incontinence, dysuria, thrombocytopenia, kidney calculus
* Rare (<0.1% of patients): neutropenia, first degree heart block, hypotension, hypertension, pancreatitis, dysphagia, oliguria, rhabdomyolysis, suicide.[11]
Speaking from experience or just out of your ass?
THIS
Finally a voice of freaking reason. Smoking shit for health = FAIL
Like always when this topic comes up, they have vaporizers that take the whole smoking shit out of your concerns.
Halik, if you are so inclined to know if there are peer reviewed studies that show smoking weed is helpful, google it and ye shall find.
That's why prohibition of MJ is such a crime to society. It has not only medicinal perks, but industrial perks as well.
I'm not saying you are an ignorant person in general, but your perspective on MJ is pretty ignorant, which will change if you open your mind, do some research, and keep an honest perspective.
Yes, MJ should be legal and regulated so that those who just want to get high, can do so, and do not send their business underground where it can not be taxed, regulated, and funds organized crime.
However, on the MMJ front, you will find many many scientificially proven uses (so scientifically proven it's not really even up for debate any more, just like the sky is blue), where the mild, mild harm from non abusive smoking is greatly outweight by the benefits.
Smoking anything isn't really 'healthy', but look at all these "designer drugs" that are in pill form. Their potential side effects are so dramatically more dangerous than any harm from smoking pot that it's literally comparing apples to oranges.
Btw, there are many remedies you might hear from your grandma that are legit.
The bottomline is that MJ is a wonder plant, arguably the most beneficial plant in existence to humans and the medical benefits are just one of many reasons for it's cultivation.
You ever look at the side effects to those designer drugs?
100% worse than MJ
ex) Lyrica vs MMJ as medicine for fibromyalgia
What the drug war supporters don't understand is that people like myself can get marijuana more easily than the OP. I don't live in a state that has legalized marijuana for medical purposes. I don't need to go to a doctor. I don't need to pay $150 for a license. I just make a phone call and it's delivered shortly afterward. And there's no sales tax either.
Well post up some peer reviewed studies that show smoking weed is helpful for x.
Again I'm not arguing that weed should be schedule 1 or that THC has no medical benefits. My point is simply that smoking anything is a retarded way to go about doing it. There will be virtually no pharma research so long it's shedule 1 and "better smoking weed than FDA approved drugs" is hardly a rational argument to base public policy on (but hey, it will get passed via proposition)
Again in the age of designer drugs, billions of dollars in medical research and people with biotech phds, inhaling smoke from burning plant is the medication? That's why it sounds like one of those remedies i heard form my grandma.
I think that alone shows your bias towards ganj...
As far as my ignorant perspective, it seems that it's the proponents of the medical weed thing that keeps throwing all these statements around w/o any backing ("weed has only these 4 side effects", "smoking pot is totally fine in comparison") as if this was a common knowledge or proven fact.
The only peer reviewed studies I've seen dealt with THC, rather than smoking weed. I have seen studies correlate lower serotonin levels for habitual weed smokers.
If THC was a complete miracle drug, wouldn't you expect pharma to throw some serious money at it? Dronabinol is schedule 3 drug - if that was a miracle like you claim, you'd expect that anyone on xanax would beon it by now.
Halik, ask and ye shall receive. Lots of peer reviewed studies, pick your condition:Well post up some peer reviewed studies that show smoking weed is helpful for x.
Again I'm not arguing that weed should be schedule 1 or that THC has no medical benefits. My point is simply that smoking anything is a retarded way to go about doing it. There will be virtually no pharma research so long it's shedule 1 and "better smoking weed than FDA approved drugs" is hardly a rational argument to base public policy on (but hey, it will get passed via proposition)
Again in the age of designer drugs, billions of dollars in medical research and people with biotech phds, inhaling smoke from burning plant is the medication? That's why it sounds like one of those remedies i heard form my grandma.
