Media-hyped McNair ties Legacy-supported Manning for NFL MVP . . . Limbaugh asked to comment

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Put Vick on a team with a good running game and some good receivers. Holy cow would that be insane.

1st down. 5 yard gain by RB
2nd down. 5 yard gain by RB
1st down. 8 yard gain by RB
(defense brings the safeties up)
2nd down: play action naked bootleg for 50 yards :)

Next series, pass on the play action when they send the corners after you on the bootleg.

Man what a weapon. But he needs a supporting cast. Plummer is the poor man's vick :) Go broncos!
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
For the last time . . . Rush is NOT an idiot for saying McNabb was overrated. Rush is an idiot for saying McNabb was overrated intentionally by the media b/c he's black. Big difference.

Vick has a great skill set . . . as does McNabb. On any given Sunday . . . I want Favre. Over the next 5 years, I would prefer Vick . . . possibly even McNabb . . . but definitely McNair. Tom Brady is a decent option is well . . . but he's white and I doubt the liberal media would allow him to reach his potential. If I must have a white QB then I would definitely pick Manning (Peyton not Eli).
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
Where do you idiots get this from? Please quote the date Rush stated all drug ABUSERS should be prison.. Just make stuff up to fit your story.. Besides, stating that someone ELSE is hyping a person because they are black is not racist.. he is accusing others of hyping based on race.. That does not make you a racist.. But, again, that doesn't fit your bigoted agenda...

You asked :)

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/gophotwrush.html

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/gophotwrush.html

"It's kind of like sentencing. A lot of people say that we have a heavy sentence for this crime and a light sentence for another crime, and what we ought to do is reduce the heavy sentence so it's more in line with the other. Wrong. In most cases we ought to increase the light sentence and make it compatible with the heavy sentence, and be serious about punishment because we are becoming too tolerant as a society, folks, especially of crime, in too many parts of the country."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/gophotwrush.html
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Crimson
Where do you idiots get this from? Please quote the date Rush stated all drug ABUSERS should be prison.. Just make stuff up to fit your story.. Besides, stating that someone ELSE is hyping a person because they are black is not racist.. he is accusing others of hyping based on race.. That does not make you a racist.. But, again, that doesn't fit your bigoted agenda...

You asked :)

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/gophotwrush.html

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/gophotwrush.html

"It's kind of like sentencing. A lot of people say that we have a heavy sentence for this crime and a light sentence for another crime, and what we ought to do is reduce the heavy sentence so it's more in line with the other. Wrong. In most cases we ought to increase the light sentence and make it compatible with the heavy sentence, and be serious about punishment because we are becoming too tolerant as a society, folks, especially of crime, in too many parts of the country."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/gophotwrush.html[/q


The first quote is obviously referring to non-prescription drug use.. its taken out of context.. He is talking about he negative effect it has on a community. I don't think this exactly applies in Rush's case.. His addiction was started by a prescription drug a doctor gave him.. not the corner drug dealer.. Obviously he is still violating the law, and his punishment should fit the impact.. which was minimal to society.. a fine would be sufficient.. If he continues to abuse, and repeats, I think jail would be appropriate.. I don't think he would disagree with that either.. he f'ed up.. and he admits that.. and he sought help. But he is not buying cocaine from the corner dealer either.. which is clearly what the quote is referring to. I also don't think he was talking about throwing away the key on the first time offender.. its the repeat offenders who continually go and puchase this stuff over and over which are the problem.

Second quote deals with dealing drugs.. Rush was not doing that, so I am not sure why you would bring it up?

3rd quote deals with sentencing.. which again, has nothing to do with drug use specifically.. so I am not sure why you would bring it up here.. Other than to perhaps suggest he should somehow get a harsher sentence because of his political views.. ok, harsher than the average 1st time prescription drug user would be a slap on the wrist, because most don't even get that.. Also, the quote is completely out of context.. was he referring to violent crime? Sex crimes? That quote means nothing without the context in which is was brought up.

Besides, this has nothing to do with McNabb being an overated QB.. Please tell me again how saying that you think OTHERS are hyping a player because they are black makes HIM racist? He may be WRONG, but not racist. Thats like saying that if I accuse someone of hiring a black person over me for racial quotas, I am a racist.. when in fact, I could have been turned down for that job precisely because of my race.. Pointing out that race is a factor in someone elses decisions is NOT racism.. but you liberals like to throw the race card around so much because it allows you to force your views onto people who are too afraid to speak their views for fear of being labled.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Crimson
Sorry, but I have to do it:


O V E R A T E D!

:p Buahaha :p
I was very happy to see McNabb lose today, but then again I'm a Packer fan and still sort of pissed about last week;) 4th and 26 - cripes. But good to see the iggles went down hard - they shouldn't have been there today.

CkG
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Crimson
Sorry, but I have to do it:


O V E R A T E D!

:p Buahaha :p
I was very happy to see McNabb lose today, but then again I'm a Packer fan and still sort of pissed about last week;) 4th and 26 - cripes. But good to see the iggles went down hard - they shouldn't have been there today.

CkG

Green Bay should've never been in the playoffs. That guy from AZ was out of bounds! :)

 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Crimson
Sorry, but I have to do it:


O V E R A T E D!

:p Buahaha :p
I was very happy to see McNabb lose today, but then again I'm a Packer fan and still sort of pissed about last week;) 4th and 26 - cripes. But good to see the iggles went down hard - they shouldn't have been there today.

CkG

Green Bay should've never been in the playoffs. That guy from AZ was out of bounds! :)

You shut up! Green Bay Rules! :)

Stop changing the subject! McNabb - Overated!
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
I was very happy to see McNabb lose today, but then again I'm a Packer fan and still sort of pissed about last week 4th and 26 - cripes. But good to see the iggles went down hard - they shouldn't have been there today.
I knew there was something wrong with you but I couldn't put my finger on it . . . you're a Cheesehead! My wife grew up in Kenosha . . . was crying like a baby . . . actually she was cursing like a sailor . . . when the Packers lost last week. She blamed the loss on the Favre. It's tough when the unskilled, unintelligent QB tries to make a pass that's beyond his ability but he doesn't have enough sense not to try it anyway. McNabb would have NEVER thrown that pass . . . he would have been intercepted at least two plays prior.;)
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I was very happy to see McNabb lose today, but then again I'm a Packer fan and still sort of pissed about last week 4th and 26 - cripes. But good to see the iggles went down hard - they shouldn't have been there today.
I knew there was something wrong with you but I couldn't put my finger on it . . . you're a Cheesehead! My wife grew up in Kenosha . . . was crying like a baby . . . actually she was cursing like a sailor . . . when the Packers lost last week. She blamed the loss on the Favre. It's tough when the unskilled, unintelligent QB tries to make a pass that's beyond his ability but he doesn't have enough sense not to try it anyway. McNabb would have NEVER thrown that pass . . . he would have been intercepted at least two plays prior.;)

2nd half O play calling was atrocious by the Pack - plus their D has been shaky all year. The loss was not Farve's fault - it was more the defense's fault since they allowed a conversion on 4th and 26!!!:|

I'm not a born and bred cheese head though, but I did adopt them as "my" team when I moved there when I was 7.

Farve > [insert any current QB name here] :D

CkG
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
I heard Des Moines was getting an expansion team in the near future.

Yeah, right!! :) :D

<---thinks he'd rather live in Iowa than Michigan...football wise. ;)