• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

measuring games performance across CPU and GPU

W

wahdangun

Golden Member
BF1_Vega.png
BF1_1080.png


Civ_1080.png


Civ_Vega.png


so what the hell hapen in this benchmark ?? why the CPU performance so depend on wich GPU brand you use ?

and to my surprise the Vega LC is actually competitive ??
 
i don't think this is the right conclusion you should make from these graphs. some games (engines) work better on 1 GPU architecture but not the other, some games like more cores, some like higher frequency. drivers also come into play in the way they are able to utilize the CPU resources available.

or you could go the conspiracy way, hinting that AMD makes nVIDIA cards run slower with their CPUs, and make Intel CPUs look bad with their VEGA cards...
 
Borealis7 said:
i don't think this is the right conclusion you should make from these graphs. some games (engines) work better on 1 GPU architecture but not the other, some games like more cores, some like higher frequency. drivers also come into play in the way they are able to utilize the CPU resources available.

or you could go the conspiracy way, hinting that AMD makes nVIDIA cards run slower with their CPUs, and make Intel CPUs look bad with their VEGA cards...
Click to expand...

not trying to start conspiracy or anything like that, its just the data was quite fascinating, and its mean when we choose our GPU we must also consider our cpu architecture/brand to get the most of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top