Steeplerot
Lifer
- Mar 29, 2004
- 13,051
- 6
- 81
Yes, unfortunately.You mean, "free" from their earthly bounds?
Yes, unfortunately.You mean, "free" from their earthly bounds?
Anyone who thinks we went there to free the poor Iraqi people and give them a better life watches too many soap operas and reality tv. We went to kick Saddam's ass, make money for the wealthy at tax payer expense, and set up a military base next to Iran.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The USA has no business trying to reform the countries in the Middle East into something resembling democracy. I think the blood of our soldiers is worth more than that. Why waste good American Dollars on trying to create this imaginary Muslim Utopia where everyone loves respects their fellow man and all religions live together in peace and harmony???? It is never going to happen. Pull out our soldiers now.
Mission Accomplished?
In Iraq, assassinations are a nightly event.
05/03/11 Reuters: Sticky bomb wounds Iraq's grain board director in southeastern Baghdad
A sticky bomb attached to a vehicle carrying Iraq's grain board director, Hassan Ibrahim, wounded him and a passer-by and killed his driver when it went off in southeastern Baghdad, an Interior Ministry source said.
05/03/11 Reuters: Roadside bomb wounds 3 people in southern Baghdad
A roadside bomb went off and wounded three people, including one policeman, in Baghdad's southern Doura district, an Interior Ministry source said.
05/03/11 Reuters: Roadside bomb wounds civilian in central Baghdad
A roadside bomb wounded one civilian when it exploded in central Baghdad, an Interior Ministry source said.
05/03/11 Reuters: Sticky bomb kills municipality employee in eastern Baghdad[/B]
A sticky bomb attached to the car of a Baghdad municipality female employee killed her when it went off in eastern Baghdad, an Interior Ministry source said.
05/03/11 Reuters: Gunmen kill civilian in western Mosul
Gunmen using silenced weapons killed a civilian in front of his house late on Monday in western Mosul, police said.
05/03/11 Reuters: Gunmen kill 2 civilians in northwestern Baghdad
Gunmen on a speeding motorcycle using silenced weapons killed two civilians late on Monday in Baghdad's northwestern Hurriya District, an Interior Ministry source said.
05/02/11 Reuters: Sticky bomb wounds four people in Hilla
A sticky bomb attached to a car in a parking lot exploded, wounding four people, in the city of Hilla, 100 km (62 miles) south of Baghdad, said Major-General Fadhil Razaq, the chief of police in Babil province.
05/02/11 Reuters: Roadside bomb kills 3 people in Sadr City district
A roadside bomb exploded near a police station, killing three civilians and wounding 14, in Baghdad's northeastern Sadr City district, an Interior Ministry source said.
05/02/11 Reuters: Roadside bomb wounds 3 people in central Baghdad
BAGHDAD - A roadside bomb went off near a cafe and wounded three people in Baghdad's central Abu Nawas Street, an Interior Ministry source said.
^^^ Just in the last two days.
Certainly, some Iraqis are far better off now that Saddam is gone. Many, however, are not.
My question is, was the budget breaking and heart breaking cost to us in national treasure and the lives of our young men and women even remotely worth the result?
By many accounts, Iran seems to be the big winner here. Is THIS what we wanted?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While I can agree with piasabird in most of that position, the glaring illogic that needs to be stated and challenged is in the first sentence.
Its not a matter that the USA can not make it their business to bring improvement and democracy to other nations, the current problem is and remains, the USA is now absolutely incompetent at nation building. And hence screw up and wreck any nation we touch.
Under wiser leadership after WW2, the USA did a fine job at Nation rebuilding in Germany and Japan, and while we were at it the USA helped rebuild bomb ravaged Europe.
Not going to happen. They like dying more than we like living.These things are up to the Iraqi forces to deal with. When we leave they will get tired of being killed and fight back. But we have to leave first. I wouldn't be surpirsed to see the bombings stop after we leave. They are only doing it to keep our attention anyway, they are killing their own mostly now.
Technically, Secretary Rumsfeld was correct. The war against Iraq's army was over in a matter of weeks. Unfortunately the Bush administration was entirely unprepared for the aftermath of that war.US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld tells hundreds of US military personnel gathered at the US Aviano airbase in northern Italy that Washington does not expect a possible war with Iraq to last long and is not planning to mobilise all its reservists. He says a war with Iraq, if it happens, would last "six days, maybe six weeks" but certainly less than six months. (Rumsfeld, press briefing, US airbase in Aviano, Italy, February 7, 2003)
"It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could be six days, six weeks. I doubt six months."
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense, 2/7/03
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2738089.stm)
"The idea that it's going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990. Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that."- Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense, 11/15/02
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/20/iraq-retrospective-read-_n_92575.html)
------------
Now stfu.
It is not a valid comparison IMO. Iraq was an artificial construct, lines on a map held together by a totally ruthless regime. Throughout history Iraq was ruled from without for the most part, and was at war internally the rest of the time. We took the cork off the bottle so to speak.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While I can agree with piasabird in most of that position, the glaring illogic that needs to be stated and challenged is in the first sentence.
Its not a matter that the USA can not make it their business to bring improvement and democracy to other nations, the current problem is and remains, the USA is now absolutely incompetent at nation building. And hence screw up and wreck any nation we touch.
Under wiser leadership after WW2, the USA did a fine job at Nation rebuilding in Germany and Japan, and while we were at it the USA helped rebuild bomb ravaged Europe.
Its not a matter that the USA can not make it their business to bring improvement and democracy to other nations, the current problem is and remains, the USA is now absolutely incompetent at nation building. And hence screw up and wreck any nation we touch.
And Perknose? Do you wish me to start posting headlines of all the crimes and murders that take place in the U.S. on a daily basis? In *any* country on a daily basis?
Technically, Secretary Rumsfeld was correct. The war against Iraq's army was over in a matter of weeks. Unfortunately the Bush administration was entirely unprepared for the aftermath of that war.
Iraq 2003 gave us a new concept of Pyrrhic Victory.
In some other country we chose to invade. Nobody "looks fondly" at the good old days of Iraq. Move to Iraq and help them out if you want, but the whole basis of your argument is skewed. Our country deposed the dictator at great cost, and replaced it with what?This aptly shows the difference between left and right. The right says they are now free and fewer people are being murdered, but they have a major problem with terrorism. The left looks fondly at the good old days when they lived under a dictator and the government had a monopoly on murder. Being firmly to the right, I would much prefer living free, knowing that there are terrorists who may kill me and a government trying to prevent it. The left, as usual, prefers the orderliness of living under a dictator who may kill you with no one trying to prevent it.
A democratically elected government with a constitution ratified by its people - things to which the left pays lip service but little more.In some other country we chose to invade. Nobody "looks fondly" at the good old days of Iraq. Move to Iraq and help them out if you want, but the whole basis of your argument is skewed. Our country deposed the dictator at great cost, and replaced it with what?
Yes, this is what we wanted.
The Iraqi's are free to elect representatives that will enact policies that in theory will support the electorates will.
And, if they don't, the electorate can have issue with those representatives.
What they won't have is a brutal dictator that we helped into power randomly killing, raping, and terrorizing the populace because he, his sons, and their regime think it's fun.
Instead, it's their own neighbors.
So finally, they'll have to look into the mirror: No longer will it be the Hated West (that delusion only works for so long).
That is the point of going into Iraq.
Chuck
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under wiser leadership after WW2, the USA did a fine job at Nation rebuilding in Germany and Japan, and while we were at it the USA helped rebuild bomb ravaged Europe.
That's certainly true of many Middle East nations (and even more so of Afghanistan), but Iraqis seem to be fairly intelligent and literate. Some of our difficulties can be tied to Islam, some to the Arabic culture, but a large part is in our own missteps. Unlike the Underpants Gnomes, our question mark was at step 3.The difference is that the Japanese and Germans were intelligent and not riddled with illiteracy rates like most nations in the Middle East.
