• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

McCain's Lobbyist girlfriend?

FoBoT

No Lifer
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02...ml?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02...login&pagewanted=print

For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk

WASHINGTON ? Early in Senator John McCain?s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.

A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, in his offices and aboard a client?s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself ? instructing staff members to block the woman?s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.

When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist?s clients, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.

Mr. McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship. But to his advisers, even the appearance of a close bond with a lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee Mr. McCain led threatened the story of redemption and rectitude that defined his political identity.

It had been just a decade since an official favor for a friend with regulatory problems had nearly ended Mr. McCain?s political career by ensnaring him in the Keating Five scandal. In the years that followed, he reinvented himself as the scourge of special interests, a crusader for stricter ethics and campaign finance rules, a man of honor chastened by a brush with shame.

But the concerns about Mr. McCain?s relationship with Ms. Iseman underscored an enduring paradox of his post-Keating career. Even as he has vowed to hold himself to the highest ethical standards, his confidence in his own integrity has sometimes seemed to blind him to potentially embarrassing conflicts of interest.

Mr. McCain promised, for example, never to fly directly from Washington to Phoenix, his hometown, to avoid the impression of self-interest because he sponsored a law that opened the route nearly a decade ago. But like other lawmakers, he often flew on the corporate jets of business executives seeking his support, including the media moguls Rupert Murdoch, Michael R. Bloomberg and Lowell W. Paxson, Ms. Iseman?s client. (Last year he voted to end the practice.)
Vicki Iseman

McCain has been in Washington so long and has worked with so many lobbyists, he'll be fighting stories of favors from lobbyists for the next 8 months

i think people will listen to Obama's message of getting rid of the power of lobbyists in Washington and these investigations into McCain's ties to lobbyists won't stop
 
Yep, now that he's got the nomination locked up, NYT is beginning the hit pieces.

Somehow I'm not surprised. :roll:
 
I hate to be the first post after the OP, but has anybody seen McCain's wife? Especially yesterday when he may the "eloquent but empty rhetoric" speech? WTF is wrong with her eyes? They looked scary on my HDTV.

Originally posted by: Pabster
Yep, now that he's got the nomination locked up, NYT is beginning the hit pieces.

Somehow I'm not surprised. :roll:

You think they set him up?
 
this part of the article is interesting also

In interviews, the two former associates said they joined in a series of confrontations with Mr. McCain, warning him that he was risking his campaign and career. Both said Mr. McCain acknowledged behaving inappropriately and pledged to keep his distance from Ms. Iseman. The two associates, who said they had become disillusioned with the senator, spoke independently of each other and provided details that were corroborated by others.

 
Originally posted by: Dari
...anybody seen McCain's wife? Especially yesterday when he may the "eloquent but empty rhetoric" speech? WTF is wrong with her eyes?

she is a Stepford wife i think, or an animatronic Barbie doll
 
Originally posted by: sonambulo
I bet Romney is kicking himself in the ass right now

technically, he only suspended his campaign

although that "i endorse john mccain, i release you to vote for him" thing might be a problem

not sure if "take backsy's" is allowed in primaries or not
 
Originally posted by: loki8481
so, how many lobbyist pork bills did McCain push through? seems like that's the only thing that would matter.

from what i understand from watching a discussion of the article on "Lou Dobbs" on CNN, this is just the lead article of an ongoing series from a lengthy investigation, so i guess we'll have to see what additional specifics they have dug up
 
Originally posted by: Dari
I hate to be the first post after the OP, but has anybody seen McCain's wife? Especially yesterday when he may the "eloquent but empty rhetoric" speech? WTF is wrong with her eyes? They looked scary on my HDTV.

Originally posted by: Pabster
Yep, now that he's got the nomination locked up, NYT is beginning the hit pieces.

Somehow I'm not surprised. :roll:

You think they set him up?

Usually I don't talk about appearance, but I thought I was the only one who noticed anything. At one point, when McCain criticized something about Obama I swear she rolled her eyes. That got me focused on them, and I agree that something didn't look right.
 
from a link on drudgereport

http://www.drudgereportarchive...20_155408_flashnyt.htm
McCain has personally pleaded with NY TIMES editor Bill Keller not to publish the high-impact report involving key telecom legislation before the Senate Commerce Committee, newsroom insiders tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

The paper's Jim Rutenberg has been leading the investigation and is described as beyond frustrated with McCain's aggressive and angry efforts to stop any and all publication.

The drama involves a woman lobbyist who may have helped to write key telecom legislation. The woman in question has retained counsel and strongly denies receiving any special treatment from McCain.
 
She's hot he's not. And she's basically playing the part of Pretty Woman only with an agenda that doesn't involve him paying her. It's an all too common theme these days. Hot chic whoos old fartbag to do her bidding and gets rich in the process. Really, with the garbage on television these days its amazing all our girls don't grow up to be whores.
 
Absolutely no proof of anything. This story will blow over. I got a rumor for you, I saw on another website that Hillary Clinton's is a lesbian and has her girlfriend with her at all times. Don't you like rumors. I also heard that Obama is secretly a radical Muslim.



 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Yep, now that he's got the nomination locked up, NYT is beginning the hit pieces.

Somehow I'm not surprised. :roll:
So I guess if you were the EIC of a major newspaper you just would have not run the story.

 
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Originally posted by: Pabster
Yep, now that he's got the nomination locked up, NYT is beginning the hit pieces.

Somehow I'm not surprised. :roll:
So I guess if you were the EIC of a major newspaper you just would have not run the story.

Originally posted by: BarneyFife
So far a lot of speculation but no hard evidence.

if all they've got is speculation and using Fox News-ish techniques of encouraging readers to fill in the gaps with the worst assumptions... no.
 
Unless she or he admit to this it won't go anywhere. Similar rumors abounded when GHWB was up for election in '88 and he still won. Obviously Clinton won even with an admitted mistress and a another woman accusing him of sexual assault.
 
I don't think I have ever seen a presidential canidate NOT have a claimed sex scandal, I guarentee Obama will have one as soon as he wins the nomination too. I'm not trying to just dismiss all these things, but it takes some hard EVIDENCE before you can say its anything more than a hit job. I'm actually surprised they let it out so early, would think they would save it till closer to the election, nobody will even remember this by the time voting starts.
 
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Originally posted by: Pabster
Yep, now that he's got the nomination locked up, NYT is beginning the hit pieces.

Somehow I'm not surprised. :roll:
So I guess if you were the EIC of a major newspaper you just would have not run the story.

Originally posted by: BarneyFife
So far a lot of speculation but no hard evidence.

if all they've got is speculation and using Fox News-ish techniques of encouraging readers to fill in the gaps with the worst assumptions... no.
If you read the article McCains own people have made the accusation.

 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Yep, now that he's got the nomination locked up, NYT is beginning the hit pieces.

Somehow I'm not surprised. :roll:
Rush has been saying something similar for years.

McCain is the maverick that the NY Times loves!! As long as he is going against his own party. The second that stops he becomes a problem.
 
The Washington Post appears to have more details on what sort of improper influence Iseman may have had over McCain during this period.

Three telecom lobbyists and a former McCain aide, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that Iseman spoke up regularly at meetings of telecom lobbyists in Washington, extolling her connections to McCain and his office. She would regularly volunteer at those meetings to be the point person for the telecom industry in dealing with McCain's office...

In the years that McCain chaired the commerce committee, Iseman lobbied for Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson, the head of what used to be Paxson Communications, now Ion Media Networks, and was involved in a successful lobbying campaign to persuade McCain and other members of Congress to send letters to the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Paxson.

In late 1999, McCain wrote two letters to the FCC urging a vote on the sale to Paxson of a Pittsburgh television station. The sale had been highly contentious in Pittsburgh and involved a multipronged lobbying effort among the parties to the deal.

At the time he sent the first letter, McCain had flown on Paxson's corporate jet four times to appear at campaign events and had received $20,000 in campaign donations from Paxson and its law firm. The second letter came on Dec. 10, a day after the company's jet ferried him to a Florida fundraiser that was held aboard a yacht in West Palm Beach.

McCain has argued that the letters merely urged a decision and did not call for action on Paxson's behalf. But when the letters became public, William E. Kennard, chairman of the FCC at the time, denounced them as "highly unusual" coming from McCain, whose committee chairmanship gave him oversight of the agency.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...2898.html?hpid=topnews
 
Back
Top