his 100 year remark is constantly distorted.
people quote it as if he was saying we should continue the current situation for another 100 years, while he was clearing comparing it to the situation we're in with Japan, where we could have a long-term stabilizing presence in the region assuming there was no continued violence or insurgency.
people quote it as if he was saying we should continue the current situation for another 100 years, while he was clearing comparing it to the situation we're in with Japan, where we could have a long-term stabilizing presence in the region assuming there was no continued violence or insurgency.
Facebook
Twitter