McCain "biggest sissy in the U.S. Senate"

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/opinion/report/120410_mccain_senate_sissy

Make no mistake, the recent Republican pronouncement that they will only deal with budget and tax-cut extensions over the next month is aimed to run out the clock on the repeal of Don’t Ask; Don’t Tell and other legislation. This is an attempt to take an end run around popular opinion now that “studying it to death” has failed. They’re simply hiding what they are up to.

The repeal of Don’t Ask; Don’t Tell is now overwhelmingly supported by citizens, military members and anyone who values the principle that all men and women are equal. No matter where you stand on it, though, you ought to be concerned about the deception. Republican’s latest gridlock attempt – coming just one day after they claimed they’d quit it – continues the tactic of claiming one thing while doing another. In a shockingly cowardly approach, they want to filibuster repeal while pretending not to.

Among Republicans, perhaps no member is more of a sissy than John McCain. (He may have shown some stones 40 years ago, but not for a good long time.) McCain definitively proved his cowardice when he recruited Sarah Palin – at risk to the nation – in a rapacious attempt to salvage his failed presidential campaign. Further evidence arrived during his recent senatorial campaign, when he threw Arizona Hispanics (and Arizona’s largest trading partner) squarely under the campaign bus. It turns out “The Maverick” is really The Panderer.

Senator McCain engages in senseless and spineless logic, first hiding behind the troops and claiming he’d support repeal of DADT if they did. “My opinion is shaped by the view of the leaders of the military,” he had said. Then this week, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Admiral Mike Mullen testified before the Senate Armed Service Committee, “Repeal of the law will not prove unacceptable risk to military readiness. Unit cohesion will not suffer if our units are well-led. And families will not encourage their loved ones to leave the service in droves.” In short, “We’re not cowards.” At that moment, McCain looked like he had indigestion.

Now that “survey says” uniforms overwhelmingly support repeal, Senator McCain has called for another study. He specifically dismissed the testimony of Admiral Mullen as not relevant. McCain’s latest pivot goes like this, “What I want to know, and what it is the Congress’s duty to determine, is not can our armed forces implement a repeal of this law, but whether the law should be repealed.” Discrimination adds nothing and costs something. Ending discrimination costs nothing and adds something. What’s the conundrum here, John? A squirmy McCain is simply trying to prop up the illusion that he is a brave man while fleeing in panic from a drill-field phalanx of relentless, creeping gayness.

Repeal of Don’t Ask; Don’t Tell does have one small cultural effect. Open service by all Americans will drive a small wedge of diversity into a military culture that’s been increasingly co-opted by conservatives and evangelicals. But even that aspect is far detached from this decision. And judging from the military survey that cat is already out of the bag. Most soldiers have said they’ve already served with gay co-workers. Almost all who did said they don’t mind. The DADT of today is really “Don’t ask; don’t let the old-fart-in-charge find out.” It is long past time for the military to muster out this 1950’s-era “morality.”

Men and women who are now serving have no cowardice about serving with gay men and lesbians. Gay men and lesbian women certainly harbor no cowardice – or even reluctance – about serving. They’ve offered up life and limb as evidence of their bravery and patriotism. The only cowards in the room seem to be John McCain and his party. They’re afraid to find out that a gay man can be as good or better a soldier than a straight one. McCain is afraid we’ll learn that gay men are brave and strong and capable. He imagines that brave gay men will undermine the confidence of brave straight men. How queer.

Don’t be scared, John. Man up. If a gay man is braver, stronger, or better than you, that doesn’t mean you’re a sissy. Being afraid to let him show his mettle – to compete equally with you for the label of hero – is what makes you a pansy.

Undoubtedly biased commentary, but two things (in bold) in it strike me as the truth.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
"Biased commentary" is an understatement. Here's what he said.

http://mccain.senate.gov/public/ind...ecord_id=a76fc608-cb18-5e85-bf74-3554b5367d22

STATEMENT BY SENATOR JOHN McCAIN

Senator McCain’s Opening Statement at the Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing

December 2, 2010


Washington, D.C. ­– U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) delivered the following opening statement at today’s Senate Armed Services Committee hearing regarding the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law with Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen, General Ham, and Mr. Johnson:

“Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

“Let me also thank our distinguished witnesses for their service to our nation. I know that many people in our Defense Department and in our armed services devoted countless hours in the preparation of this report, especially General Ham and Mr. Johnson. I would like to thank them all for their hard work.

“Today’s hearing will consider a complex, and often emotional subject – the proposed repeal of the current law (commonly referred to as ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’) – which evokes strongly-held and legitimate differences of opinion among many Americans. It is no different among the U.S. military, as the Pentagon’s report demonstrates.

“However, I think we can all agree on a few facts as we begin this important hearing. We can all agree that our military today is the most effective, most professional, and arguably the most experienced force that our nation has ever had. We can all agree that we appreciate and honor the service of every American who wears the uniform of our country, as well as their families, especially during this time of war, regardless of whether they are straight or gay. And finally, I think we can all agree – and I certainly would – that this capable, professional force of ours couldimplement a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell if ordered to, just as they so ably and honorably do everything else that is asked of them.

“What I want to know, and what it is the Congress’s duty to determine, is not can our armed forces implement a repeal of this law, but whether the law should be repealed. Unfortunately, that key issue was not the focus of this study. It is, however, the fundamental question that must be answered by Congress – not by the President or the Courts, but by Congress. And it is a question that must be answered carefully, deliberately, and with proper consideration for the complexity of this issue and the gravity of the potential consequences for our military and the wars in which we are engaged.

“The Defense Department has had 10 months to complete this report and the RAND study that accompanies it. Together these reports and supporting documentation contain over 1,500 pages of data, material, and analysis. The members of this Committee received it 36 hours ago, and my staff and I are still going through it and analyzing it carefully, including the more than 72,000 comments that our service members provided to the working group.

“What I can say now, however, is that in addition to my concerns about what questions were not asked by this survey and considered in this report, I am troubled by the fact that this report only represents the input of 28 percent of the force who received the questionnaire. That is only six percent of the force at large. I find it hard to view that as a fully-representative sample set, but I am nonetheless weighing the contents of this report on their merits. What appears clear at this time is that the survey and anecdotal data underlying this report do not lead to one unequivocal conclusion, which is no surprise considering the complex and difficult nature of this issue.

“So, for example, I recognize that, of those surveyed who report having worked with a gay service member, 92 percent said their unit’s ability to work together was not negatively affected. Among those in Army combat units, 89 percent of respondents felt that way, as did 84 percent of respondents in Marine combat units.

“However, we also learned that, of those surveyed, 30 percent of the total, 43 percent of Marines, 48 percent of Army combat units, and 58 percent of Marine combat units believe that a repeal of the law would have a negative or very negative impact on their units’ ability to ‘work together to get the job done.’ Furthermore, 67 percent of Marines and nearly 58 percent of Army soldiers in combat units believe that repeal of the law would have negative consequences on unit cohesion in a field environment or out at sea.

“This is supplemented by comments like these: ‘I believe this is not the time for us to make huge changes in the military. We are at war and our men and women overseas do not need any more distractions. This issue should be addressed at the appropriate time. That time is not now.’”

“I remain concerned as I have in the past and is demonstrated in this study, that the closer we get to service members in combat, the more we encounter concerns about whether ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ should be repealed, and what impact that would have on the ability of these units to perform their mission. These views should not be considered lightly, especially considering how much combat our force is facing. Additionally, I am concerned about the impact of a rush to repeal when even this survey has found that such a significant number of our service members feel that it would negatively impact military effectiveness.

“Mr. Chairman: As we move forward with our discussion on this matter, I hope that everyone will put aside political motives and agendas. I also hope that everyone, on both sides, will refrain from questioning people’s integrity. Finally, I hope that everyone will recognize that this debate is focused on our military and its effectiveness, not on broader social issues being debated in our society at large.

“This is a complex and important issue that could have significant repercussions for our force – a force that is engaged in its tenth straight year of sustained combat, but a force that is performing exceptionally well. At this time, we should be inherently cautious about making any changes that would affect our military, and what changes we do make should be the product of careful and deliberate consideration.

“I am not saying this law should never change. I am simply saying that it may be premature to make such a change at this time and in this manner, without further consideration of this report and further study of the issue by Congress – for of all the people we serve, one of our highest responsibilities is to the men and women of our armed services, especially those risking their lives in combat.”
 
Last edited:

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
It's ironic and funny to see whiny wussies calling one of the toughest men, a war hero who was tortured and beaten for years, a man who overcame everything to almost become the president of the united states a "sissy" from behind a keyboard. He is pretty much the diametric opposite of what one would ever call a "sissy", while his detractors fit that description in every sense of the word.

You might not agree with his politics (many don't), and you might not agree with him personally, but anyone calling McCain a sissy pretty much has no credibility anyway.
 
Last edited:

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
"..while his detractors fit that description in every sense of the word."

uncalled for. And I'm sure the Senator McCain respects the courage of those on both sides of issues who stand up for what the believe.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
It's ironic and funny to see whiny wussies calling one of the toughest men, a war hero who was tortured and beaten for years, a man who overcame everything to almost become the president of the united states a "sissy" from behind a keyboard. He is pretty much the diametric opposite of what one would ever call a "sissy", while his detractors fit that description in every sense of the word.
I never knew you were one of his detractors.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
I never knew you were one of his detractors.

I agree with McCain some of the time, not always. Calling me a sissy is fine (though dumb since you don't know anything about me anyway), calling him a "sissy" is plain stupid.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
I agree with McCain some of the time, not always. Calling me a sissy is fine though dumb since you don't know anything about me anyway.
Well then wouldn't that hold true with you calling his detractors "sissies"?
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
Mcain is half the politician he used to be. You youngins can't remember the guy who used to stand up for what he really believed. Not what is popular at the time.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Truth is uncalled for?

I equate "sissy" with timidity. Expressing disagreement with a Senator, or championing a cause in the face of hatred doesn't seem timid to me.

See, i agree with what you said about senator mcCain and the absurdity of calling him a sissy, but you chose to couple it with your own nonsensical use of the word, I guess to be clever.

Either that, or you mean to use the word as a slur.

Which is it ?
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Mcain is half the politician he used to be. You youngins can't remember the guy who used to stand up for what he really believed. Not what is popular at the time.

Is a senators job to reflect his constituants and not his/her own personal feelings? So its wrong if the public opinion changes about something and the representitive for that public changes with it?

:hmm:
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
I'm sure lower taxes are higher on the average voter's priority list than repealing DADT. Why, then, would the author of the worthless crap in the OP use such a flimsy argument? Obviously, he used it to win over the zombie majority.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Mcain is half the politician he used to be. You youngins can't remember the guy who used to stand up for what he really believed. Not what is popular at the time.
Yeah like when he was part of the group of five.

:D
 

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
McCain's complaint about the survey not having many respondents seems valid on face level, but less so when you consider the fact that this is probably a typical response rate. There is statistical analysis that can be conducted to make sure it is a valid and representative sample, and I'm assuming this was done so.