brianmanahan
Lifer
- Sep 2, 2006
- 24,591
- 5,994
- 136
is it bad that I enjoy acting stupid on a regular basis? it's quite cathartic.
i do it erry day :awe:
is it bad that I enjoy acting stupid on a regular basis? it's quite cathartic.
To thyself be true.hmm, my personality type is STFU. what does it mean?
MBTI is quackery. Like astrology or ouija boards, there is no need to fret or dwell on it.
NTPs are the smartest because they're the most creative overall and they're the most eloquent due to the precision of Ti combined with the creativity of Ne.
The world wasnt created by deductive reason, it was created by inductive reason.
Next up would have to be NFPs.
Then a tie between NTJs and STPs. Then NFJs and SFPs. SJs are not only at the bottom they are nowhere close to NFJs and SFPs. SJs cant observe or understand reality.
Functions that are masters for intelligence are Ne, Ti, Se, and Fi (in that order). Ne dominance or auxiliary means that you see all the possibilities and so they always get one right. Those with dominant or aux Ni are often wrong because they make premature judgement. Ni would be the slave function between those two.
Ti is independent thinking which I dont have... auxiliary or dominant Ti never embarasses themself and never hurts themself by accident when it comes to making choices.
When taking an iq test, photographic memory is equal to retention because the iq test has questions that you havent studied for. however, Si is the slave to Se because Si retains information (but not more than Se does and that's because Si organizes) while Se observes naturally.
Fi is independent feeling as it understands everyone's feelings. Fe does not. Fe sacrifices and SFJ women like to be dormats, while NFJs cant make up their mind about whose dormat they wish to be.
anyway, what do you agree with in this post and why? what do you disagree with in this post and why?
I don't see what's so controversial about acknowledging that different people have different personalities.
NTPs are the smartest because they're the most creative overall and they're the most eloquent due to the precision of Ti combined with the creativity of Ne.
The world wasnt created by deductive reason, it was created by inductive reason.
Next up would have to be NFPs.
Then a tie between NTJs and STPs. Then NFJs and SFPs. SJs are not only at the bottom they are nowhere close to NFJs and SFPs. SJs cant observe or understand reality.
Functions that are masters for intelligence are Ne, Ti, Se, and Fi (in that order). Ne dominance or auxiliary means that you see all the possibilities and so they always get one right. Those with dominant or aux Ni are often wrong because they make premature judgement. Ni would be the slave function between those two.
Ti is independent thinking which I dont have... auxiliary or dominant Ti never embarasses themself and never hurts themself by accident when it comes to making choices.
When taking an iq test, photographic memory is equal to retention because the iq test has questions that you havent studied for. however, Si is the slave to Se because Si retains information (but not more than Se does and that's because Si organizes) while Se observes naturally.
Fi is independent feeling as it understands everyone's feelings. Fe does not. Fe sacrifices and SFJ women like to be dormats, while NFJs cant make up their mind about whose dormat they wish to be.
anyway, what do you agree with in this post and why? what do you disagree with in this post and why?
Is there anywhere I can go to see what you just said means? I have literally never heard any of those acronyms before in my entire life.
Is there anywhere I can go to see what you just said means? I have literally never heard any of those acronyms before in my entire life.
The is nothing wrong with that. The MBTI simply doesn't do what it purports to do. The methodology is flawed.
Read the article I linked above. The method is not capable of actually differentiating traits. It is like taking a mixed bag of oranges and apples, weighing each piece of fruit, and declaring all the fruits over an arbitrary weight to be oranges and those under to be apples.How?
Of course it isnt 100% accurate but it isnt 100% wrong either. Look at why its manual says it is 75% accurate.Read the article I linked above. The method is not capable of actually differentiating traits. It is like taking a mixed bag of oranges and apples, weighing each piece of fruit, and declaring all the fruits over an arbitrary weight to be oranges and those under to be apples.
you're so cuteTested ENTP here. Its a crock though.
HereIs there anywhere I can go to see what you just said means? I have literally never heard any of those acronyms before in my entire life.
Read the article I linked above. The method is not capable of actually differentiating traits. It is like taking a mixed bag of oranges and apples, weighing each piece of fruit, and declaring all the fruits over an arbitrary weight to be oranges and those under to be apples.