• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mazda RX-8 - opinions?

It's ok, looks like a fun car that I'd buy as a daily driver. Mazda needs to bring back the RX-7, though.
 
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Beautiful car. Would be damned near perfect if they used the 270 HP 2.4L Turboed FSI engine instead of the wanker engine.

or if they snagged the fd engine and upped it
 
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: Sheepathon
Good for Cyclops, bad for daily driver.

Why is it bad for a daily driver? Quality problems or something?

I read in a review somewhere that it eats motor oil like crazy, and also gets piss poor mileage.
 
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
mazada screwed up, hence why they are dropping it and bringing back the rx7

Eh? Screwed up design-wise?

its fugly, and under powered

238hp is underpowered?? My old car had 85! 😱

Plus, I personally love the design.
 
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
mazada screwed up, hence why they are dropping it and bringing back the rx7

Eh? Screwed up design-wise?

its fugly, and under powered

238hp is underpowered?? My old car had 85! 😱

Plus, I personally love the design.

compared to the fd rx-7, yes its underpowered. they could've done so much with that engine, but they didnt. your old car had 85, lemme guess, early 80s honda?
 
I've heard the RX7 is coming back. I assume that means they're scrapping the rotary engine, correct? What other major differences will there be?
 
Originally posted by: Sheepathon
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: Sheepathon
Good for Cyclops, bad for daily driver.

Why is it bad for a daily driver? Quality problems or something?

I read in a review somewhere that it eats motor oil like crazy, and also gets piss poor mileage.

Wankel engines are supposed to eat some motor oil.
 
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
mazada screwed up, hence why they are dropping it and bringing back the rx7

Eh? Screwed up design-wise?

its fugly, and under powered

238hp is underpowered?? My old car had 85! 😱

Plus, I personally love the design.

compared to the fd rx-7, yes its underpowered. they could've done so much with that engine, but they didnt. your old car had 85, lemme guess, early 80s honda?

Nah, 91 Saturn, first year. It picked up pretty nicely too 😛
 
Originally posted by: CPA
I've heard the RX7 is coming back. I assume that means they're scrapping the rotary engine, correct? What other major differences will there be?

supercharger instead of turbo

and it still will be rotary
 
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
mazada screwed up, hence why they are dropping it and bringing back the rx7

Eh? Screwed up design-wise?

its fugly, and under powered

238hp is underpowered?? My old car had 85! 😱

Plus, I personally love the design.

compared to the fd rx-7, yes its underpowered. they could've done so much with that engine, but they didnt. your old car had 85, lemme guess, early 80s honda?

Nah, 91 Saturn, first year. It picked up pretty nicely too 😛

wow, my 82 accord has 85 hp, thats horrible
 
Originally posted by: CPA
I've heard the RX7 is coming back. I assume that means they're scrapping the rotary engine, correct? What other major differences will there be?



...then why would it still be a rx-7 if they scrapped the rotary engine?
 
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
mazada screwed up, hence why they are dropping it and bringing back the rx7

Eh? Screwed up design-wise?

its fugly, and under powered

238hp is underpowered?? My old car had 85! 😱

Plus, I personally love the design.

compared to the fd rx-7, yes its underpowered. they could've done so much with that engine, but they didnt. your old car had 85, lemme guess, early 80s honda?

Nah, 91 Saturn, first year. It picked up pretty nicely too 😛

wow, my 82 accord has 85 hp, thats horrible

hehe. aside from the fact that it didn't have air-conditioning, it was a great car. my dad has it now. it's just a go-cart. one thing I have to give to saturn is they know how to design shifters...the whole shifting system is just nice compared to some other cars
 
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: CPA
I've heard the RX7 is coming back. I assume that means they're scrapping the rotary engine, correct? What other major differences will there be?

supercharger instead of turbo

and it still will be rotary

thanks.
 
Originally posted by: mi xiao
Originally posted by: CPA
I've heard the RX7 is coming back. I assume that means they're scrapping the rotary engine, correct? What other major differences will there be?



...then why would it still be a rx-7 if they scrapped the rotary engine?

Because I'm a car idiot. I can do your taxes, but don't ask me to change your oil. Thanks for the clarification.
 
Back
Top