Mayo Clinic opinion on Obama Healthcare

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Are you the kind of deep thinker who finds burning down the house to be a reasonable solution to the termite problem? After all, that definitely kills the termites, and we all know a termite-infested house will not survive!

And you are the kind of deep thinker who won't extinguish a fire because he's afraid of water damage.

Like many people, I have health insurance I like which both meets my needs and doesn't cost me too much. There's no 'fire' for me. Yes, I recognize that health care spending is growing too fast to be sustainable long-term, but then so is the federal deficit, so "solving" the former problem by exacerbating the latter problem is still a bad "solution" which will quickly collapse.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Are you the kind of deep thinker who finds burning down the house to be a reasonable solution to the termite problem? After all, that definitely kills the termites, and we all know a termite-infested house will not survive!

And you are the kind of deep thinker who won't extinguish a fire because he's afraid of water damage.

Like many people, I have health insurance I like which both meets my needs and doesn't cost me too much. There's no 'fire' for me. Yes, I recognize that health care spending is growing too fast to be sustainable long-term, but then so is the federal deficit, so "solving" the former problem by exacerbating the latter problem is still a bad "solution" which will quickly collapse.

There is a fire, it's just not in your room yet, so you don't care. Who gives a sh!t if 50 million are uninsured, and many of those are sick people who cannot get necessary treatment, so long as your employer still pays for your care.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Are you the kind of deep thinker who finds burning down the house to be a reasonable solution to the termite problem? After all, that definitely kills the termites, and we all know a termite-infested house will not survive!

And you are the kind of deep thinker who won't extinguish a fire because he's afraid of water damage.

Like many people, I have health insurance I like which both meets my needs and doesn't cost me too much. There's no 'fire' for me. Yes, I recognize that health care spending is growing too fast to be sustainable long-term, but then so is the federal deficit, so "solving" the former problem by exacerbating the latter problem is still a bad "solution" which will quickly collapse.

There is a fire, it's just not in your room yet, so you don't care. Who gives a sh!t if 50 million are uninsured, and many of those are sick people who cannot get necessary treatment, so long as your employer still pays for your care.

Yet another appeal to emotion - no surprise. All the evidence (such as the CBO director's Congressional testimony) suggests the current proposals will only bankrupt the nation faster, and your only response is to scream "People are suffering! People are suffering!" People are going to be suffering a heck of a lot more once the feds start defaulting.
 

RyanPaulShaffer

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2005
3,434
1
0
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Are you the kind of deep thinker who finds burning down the house to be a reasonable solution to the termite problem? After all, that definitely kills the termites, and we all know a termite-infested house will not survive!

And you are the kind of deep thinker who won't extinguish a fire because he's afraid of water damage.

Like many people, I have health insurance I like which both meets my needs and doesn't cost me too much. There's no 'fire' for me. Yes, I recognize that health care spending is growing too fast to be sustainable long-term, but then so is the federal deficit, so "solving" the former problem by exacerbating the latter problem is still a bad "solution" which will quickly collapse.

There is a fire, it's just not in your room yet, so you don't care. Who gives a sh!t if 50 million are uninsured, and many of those are sick people who cannot get necessary treatment, so long as your employer still pays for your care.

Yet another appeal to emotion - no surprise. All the evidence (such as the CBO director's Congressional testimony) suggests the current proposals will only bankrupt the nation faster, and your only response is to scream "People are suffering! People are suffering!" People are going to be suffering a heck of a lot more once the feds start defaulting.

Excellent posts all-around, Mursilis. You are really on a roll in this thread.

Does our current health care system need work? Sure.

Do the current proposals being forced down our throats by Obama and the Democrats "fix" our health care system? No, not at all, in fact, the data is almost unanimously showing that if UHC is passed as it is current being pushed, then things would be much worse overall.

Nobody is being denied health care in this country. If you're in a car accident and break your arm, and you have no job and no insurance, you can walk into any hospital and they are required by law to treat you. People are not being tossed out on the streets by hospitals.

There is no "health care crisis"...there are big problems with our current health care system, but if you want a true crisis, a bankrupt government is a real crisis. A real catastrophe is an economy that will absolutely collapse under massive government deficits.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Are you the kind of deep thinker who finds burning down the house to be a reasonable solution to the termite problem? After all, that definitely kills the termites, and we all know a termite-infested house will not survive!

And you are the kind of deep thinker who won't extinguish a fire because he's afraid of water damage.

Like many people, I have health insurance I like which both meets my needs and doesn't cost me too much. There's no 'fire' for me. Yes, I recognize that health care spending is growing too fast to be sustainable long-term, but then so is the federal deficit, so "solving" the former problem by exacerbating the latter problem is still a bad "solution" which will quickly collapse.

Must be nice to live in a world where you can't be laid off and where you boss is always going to have funds to pay for your level of benefits. How dare you plan to sponge off your rich boss forever?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Sure it isnt, so why is it so hard to admit it and work on a feasible plan?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Instead people jump at the first flawed version that shows up and defend it to the end.

We've been dealing the the concept of health care reform for decades. What do you think HMOs were originally designed for?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...intenance_organization

You mean the HMOs that were created by federal fiat? The same HMOs that are despised by all today?

So you expect the same people who gave us a hated program 30 years ago to give us a good one now?

Wow.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Are you the kind of deep thinker who finds burning down the house to be a reasonable solution to the termite problem? After all, that definitely kills the termites, and we all know a termite-infested house will not survive!

And you are the kind of deep thinker who won't extinguish a fire because he's afraid of water damage.

Like many people, I have health insurance I like which both meets my needs and doesn't cost me too much. There's no 'fire' for me. Yes, I recognize that health care spending is growing too fast to be sustainable long-term, but then so is the federal deficit, so "solving" the former problem by exacerbating the latter problem is still a bad "solution" which will quickly collapse.

Must be nice to live in a world where you can't be laid off and where you boss is always going to have funds to pay for your level of benefits. How dare you plan to sponge off your rich boss forever?

Ah yes, the class warfare angle rears its ugly head. I'm sorry, do you have a point? Where did he imply he won't be laid off ever? He is correct in his assessment, which is what you should be reading instead of the personal attack. Please allow me to quote it for you:

Yes, I recognize that health care spending is growing too fast to be sustainable long-term, but then so is the federal deficit, so "solving" the former problem by exacerbating the latter problem is still a bad "solution" which will quickly collapse.

He is correct.

 

RyanPaulShaffer

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2005
3,434
1
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Sure it isnt, so why is it so hard to admit it and work on a feasible plan?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Instead people jump at the first flawed version that shows up and defend it to the end.

We've been dealing the the concept of health care reform for decades. What do you think HMOs were originally designed for?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...intenance_organization

You mean the HMOs that were created by federal fiat? The same HMOs that are despised by all today?

So you expect the same people who gave us a hated program 30 years ago to give us a good one now?

Wow.

Hit the nail right on the head, BoberFett.

:thumbsup:
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: RyanPaulShaffer
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Sure it isnt, so why is it so hard to admit it and work on a feasible plan?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Instead people jump at the first flawed version that shows up and defend it to the end.

We've been dealing the the concept of health care reform for decades. What do you think HMOs were originally designed for?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...intenance_organization

You mean the HMOs that were created by federal fiat? The same HMOs that are despised by all today?

So you expect the same people who gave us a hated program 30 years ago to give us a good one now?

Wow.

Hit the nail right on the head, BoberFett.

:thumbsup:

Same people?
I didn't know Nixon was still president.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Sure it isnt, so why is it so hard to admit it and work on a feasible plan?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Instead people jump at the first flawed version that shows up and defend it to the end.

We've been dealing the the concept of health care reform for decades. What do you think HMOs were originally designed for?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...intenance_organization

You mean the HMOs that were created by federal fiat? The same HMOs that are despised by all today?

So you expect the same people who gave us a hated program 30 years ago to give us a good one now?

Wow.


Shhhhh, logic has no place in this thread. Just overly emotional, tear-jerking appeals, consequences be damned!
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Sure it isnt, so why is it so hard to admit it and work on a feasible plan?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Instead people jump at the first flawed version that shows up and defend it to the end.

We've been dealing the the concept of health care reform for decades. What do you think HMOs were originally designed for?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...intenance_organization

You mean the HMOs that were created by federal fiat? The same HMOs that are despised by all today?

So you expect the same people who gave us a hated program 30 years ago to give us a good one now?

Wow.

The HMO act was passed in 1973. Nixon was President. I really don't think its the same people....
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Sure it isnt, so why is it so hard to admit it and work on a feasible plan?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Instead people jump at the first flawed version that shows up and defend it to the end.

We've been dealing the the concept of health care reform for decades. What do you think HMOs were originally designed for?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...intenance_organization

You mean the HMOs that were created by federal fiat? The same HMOs that are despised by all today?

So you expect the same people who gave us a hated program 30 years ago to give us a good one now?

Wow.

The HMO act was passed in 1973. Nixon was President. I really don't think its the same people....

It's Republicanism 101. Screw up governing, then blame government. And they want to be elected to "govern" again.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
The "independent Fed of healthcare" is probably the best idea I've heard out there, I've repeated it a couple of times. Politicians are only going to fuck it up worse.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Mursilis A solution which will bankrupt the nation is not a solution at all.
Yep, status quo is not a solution at all.

Sure it isnt, so why is it so hard to admit it and work on a feasible plan?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Instead people jump at the first flawed version that shows up and defend it to the end.
Sounds like senseamp and hillary clinton, doesn't it? :D

 

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
Originally posted by: piasabird
Anyone really wanting to start a good health care plan for people would pick a test market and first test it on a limited scale. A meglomaniac of course would propose an all or nothing plan, and claim it was a crisis.

Good one:laugh:

You guys refuse to even make an attempt to address health care for decades, then when its about to be force upon you, you say hold on wait a minute lets study this on a limited scale for many years then shit can it.;)

Any economist worth his salt knows you can't judge the effectiveness of something of this scale with a limited test trial, just a weak stall tactic

Maybe we should have tested the Iraq war on a limited scale:laugh: we should have invaded and occupied Nevada for a couple of years in preparation.

 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Obama talked about how good the Mayo Clinic health system was last month. But they do not approve of the healthcare plan. I really think healthcare needs reform but I do not think we should be rushing it like Obama wants them to. It needs to be discussed thoroughly before we kill what economy we have left.

Our current system isn't exactly doing businesses and the economy any favors. If anything, as our current system stands now, it's a huge load on the nation's economy.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Obama talked about how good the Mayo Clinic health system was last month. But they do not approve of the healthcare plan. I really think healthcare needs reform but I do not think we should be rushing it like Obama wants them to. It needs to be discussed thoroughly before we kill what economy we have left.

Our current system isn't exactly doing businesses and the economy any favors. If anything, as our current system stands now, it's a huge load on the nation's economy.

The bills that democrats have out there make it even worse. The democrats need to go back to square one and focus on cost reduction. Once costs are down most of the other things will fall in to place.
 

fisheerman

Senior member
Oct 25, 2006
733
0
0
Originally posted by: piasabird
Anyone really wanting to start a good health care plan for people would pick a test market and first test it on a limited scale. A meglomaniac of course would propose an all or nothing plan, and claim it was a crisis.

They did it! Tennessee. its going bust...................

Care
 

tk149

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2002
7,253
1
0
Originally posted by: TruePaige

The passing it is such a big political point that politicians will waffle about during election times, but if they are only making improvements and modifications (because nothing is perfect), they will be seen as doing it to improve efficiency, help the people, provide better services, lower costs, etc..

This is just the ground work, we can build upon this until our system is as close to perfect as possible.


Just as perfect as Social Security, Medicare, income taxes...