Maybe we should attack Iran's Reactors

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Good idea

or

Bad idea



Having the last phrase in the title has created a lock.
Phrase has now been removed to avoid standard implications of trolling.
Please discuss safely

Mod

 

Bumrush99

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
3,334
194
106
Maybe we stop meddling in Israeli affairs and should let them do it. They are experts at precision bombings and could get away with it far easier than the US.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Stupid Idea.

We've already attacked one Muslim country under some pretty lousy conditions, we don't need another.

Unfortunately, while it is more or less understood what they want to do with the nuclear reactors, it is not necessarily illegal for them to create them, as their "official" purpose is civilian. The really big problems are that they want to create a heavy water reactor and they want to enrich their own uranium. It was originally supposed to be they'd get it from Russia and Russia would take the waste away, but Iran felt differently.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
P.S. Today does happen to be December 7th...


Personally... I think with the words that George Bush spoke about them that they now deserve to have Nukes to protect themselves from our so called FreedomBombs
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
All we need is a few cruise missles or an air strike to crack open their reactor or severly. We even have remote control drones with cameras we can send in the bomb in without even having to fly.
 

Meuge

Banned
Nov 27, 2005
2,963
0
0
You guys misunderstand the situation. The Russians don't want the Iranians to have nuclear weapons either. Given that the situation in Chechnya hasn't improved in the past decade, a nuclear bomb in the hands of Islamic terrorists is almost as likely to wind up in Moscow, as it is in Washington. So if the Russian leadership is sane (a questionable assumption), then they will know when Iran is close to completing its project, and will alert US/Israel of it. Israel will then proceed to bomb it to smithereens, the international community will unanimously condemn this action, a few hundred European jews will be killed in antisemitic riots, and the world will go back to the status quo.

This is assuming, of course, that the Russian desire for personal safety and well being overpowers their incredible antisemitism. The latter is what worries me. There might be a good chance that they might want to gamble on it, just on an off chance that the bomb will wind up in Jerusalem or New York.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Discussing the FACT that the US's foreign policy has been and is being run by the hands of PNAC asshats is now trolling?


:roll:



But, fwiw, I wouldn't be surprised if Perle is still pushing for war. We all know Bolton (PNAC co-founder) is doing his best to muscle the UN into some security resolutions which can be used as cover for another invasion (although I have no idea where the money/troops/equipment will come from)
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,676
46,388
136
Meh, the Israelis will take out their enrichment facilities eventually.

We don't have to do a thing except possibly pass them some intel under the table.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.
 

Todd33

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2003
7,842
2
81
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.

They have fleets of our F15s, they could always stop for fuel in Iraq ;)
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: Todd33
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.

They have fleets of our F15s, they could always stop for fuel in Iraq ;)

Its the only option. America will have to get this done to have the mission accomplished by conventional means (Not implying nuclear). Now, it *could* be done but the losses for the Israelis would be 100%.

That said, Israel has neevr lost a conflict, and they have an amazing ability to overcome what others view as impossible odds so I wouldnt rule them out completely.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Bumrush99
Maybe we stop meddling in Israeli affairs and should let them do it. They are experts at precision bombings and could get away with it far easier than the US.

Good idea. Lets cut off their foreign and military aid, while we're at it. Lots of big companies invest in Israel. Some are even based there. No need to send them extra money.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.

The F15 has in-air refueling capability.

They could do the same thing that we did against Libya when our forces had to launch from England and were refused overflight over France.

Tankers refueling tankers that supported the attack aircraft.

 

azazyel

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2000
5,872
1
81
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: Bumrush99
Maybe we stop meddling in Israeli affairs and should let them do it. They are experts at precision bombings and could get away with it far easier than the US.

Good idea. Lets cut off their foreign and military aid, while we're at it. Lots of big companies invest in Israel. Some are even based there. No need to send them extra money.

Cheers!
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.

The F15 has in-air refueling capability.

They could do the same thing that we did against Libya when our forces had to launch from England and were refused overflight over France.

Tankers refueling tankers that supported the attack aircraft.

Which brings us back to America has to assist them by at least giving flight permissions through Iraq.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
What about the Russians? Will they sit by while we bomb their charges? Maybe. Maybe not.
Also, I don't think it would be technically as easy as some here describe it. You think they just popped it out in the open with a big target on top saying "Aim Here"? I think not. It's probably a well hardened setup.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: arsbanned
What about the Russians? Will they sit by while we bomb their charges? Maybe. Maybe not.
Also, I don't think it would be technically as easy as some here describe it. You think they just popped it out in the open with a big target on top saying "Aim Here"? I think not. It's probably a well hardened setup.

We've sold the Israelis bunker busters. Plus, Isreal does have cruise missles which could make the trip to the target.

Dont rule them out. If the IAF thinks it needs to be done, they will get it done. Period. The problem is so much will they as how will they.
 

Meuge

Banned
Nov 27, 2005
2,963
0
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.

LMAO

The Israelis have tons of F-15s, and their pilots are far more experienced and able than even the best American pilots (fortunately for them, unfortunately for us). They've never lost a practice exercise in mock battles with U.S. airforce.

If there is an airforce in the world that can attack that reactor at will, it's the Israelis.

As far as their losses are concerned, Israel is a small country. Even a single nuclear detonation could kill a large percentage of the population and decimate the economy completely. They have nothing to lose. I think there'd be enough pilots willing to make the one-way trip if there was no way to come back.

That being said, they took out the Iraqi reactor without losing a single plane. What makes you think they can't do the same again?
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
In case anyone has forgotten just how serious, determined and able to overcome the "impossible" the Isrealis are...
And to note...They were only 1 minute late from what they planned on. Not to shabby.

Click

If Isreal thinks Irans nuclear program needs some "help", its as good as gold they will get the job done.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.

LMAO

The Israelis have tons of F-15s, and their pilots are far more experienced and able than even the best American pilots (fortunately for them, unfortunately for us). They've never lost a practice exercise in mock battles with U.S. airforce.

If there is an airforce in the world that can attack that reactor at will, it's the Israelis.

As far as their losses are concerned, Israel is a small country. Even a single nuclear detonation could kill a large percentage of the population and decimate the economy completely. They have nothing to lose. I think there'd be enough pilots willing to make the one-way trip if there was no way to come back.

That being said, they took out the Iraqi reactor without losing a single plane. What makes you think they can't do the same again?

Your overlooking the obvious, which would mean you just lost all your planes.

They cant make it there and back without refueling. And they cant do that without the support.
Key word: Back. ;)
 

Aegeon

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2004
1,809
125
106
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Which brings us back to America has to assist them by at least giving flight permissions through Iraq.
The reality is Israel has F-15I and F-16I aircraft that can at least hit most of Iran without having to refuel at all if they go over Iraq. They also have quite a large a substancial refueling aircraft force. With the right planning its distinctly possible they could go by sea around the Arabian Peninsula and then refuel on last time before getting really close to Iran and they launch their strike. They can then rejoin the refueling aircraft back on their trip to Israel.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I'd like someone to tell me how the Israelis will dothis, considering the fact that they have no aircraft which could make the trip.

The F15 has in-air refueling capability.

They could do the same thing that we did against Libya when our forces had to launch from England and were refused overflight over France.

Tankers refueling tankers that supported the attack aircraft.

Which brings us back to America has to assist them by at least giving flight permissions through Iraq.

America does not own Iraqi airspace.

Also, asking permission is a courtesy not a requirement.