he is free
As a matter of fact he was almost lyched by the rest of the guys, the ones that werent hurt. He claimed he fall asleep while driving and the judge free him just with a big fine. The producer of the show was also fine because he didnt take safety measures while driving at night in a freeway. Fortunately there was only one dead guy because it could be worse. The guilty guy is on street living happily, and actually he works for the " Secretaria de Salud", something like governement Health Department.
by ?tartabull , 17th July
Why? Were there so many camera angles at the right spot at the right time?
by ?dancetothemusic , 17th July reply / moderate 488111,181282 ONLY FOR WOMEN
All this bunch of guys worked and work in a striptease show called " SOLO PARA MUJERES" (ONLY FOR WOMEN) in Mexico City. This guys was filming a comercial break for all ladies, but the problem was "they was filming in a highway, in the night, with a very very slow speed and with any protection and without permission" For this the both parts are guilty. Even the driver never steped the jail because he payed a deposit, because the justice said:
"The guilty is of the both parts"
Only one guy died in this accident, no drugs but only a little breath of alcohol, and because the driver said:
"I was sleeping until I was driving"
by ?Jneutron , 17th July
piece of crap.
All this bunch of guys worked and work in a striptease show called " SOLO PARA MUJERES" (ONLY FOR WOMEN) in Mexico City. This guys was filming a comercial break for all ladies, but the problem was "they was filming in a highway, in the night, with a very very slow speed and with any protection and without permission" For this the both parts are guilty. Even the driver never step the jail because he pay a deposit, because the guilty is of the both parts.
by ?mindlabs , 17th July
think [ -2 boring ]
1 of the stripper slept with the driver' wife and this is what happen when a guy gets angry
by ?zzzooozzz , 19th July