May 2009 Automotive Sales Data

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
except, GM has small cars coming out for this upcoming fuel crisis... and fuel efficient ones too...

Cruze: 40mpg... no one can touch that without diesel or a hybrid.
Volt
Beat
Terrain
Equinox


those are just the 30+ mpg vehicles GM has coming out.
So GM is going to be next summer where Toyota was last summer? Good for them, but they're a little late to wake up and smell the coffee. And they still have to find a way to turn a profit unless, as I already mentioned, Obama is going to just keep handing them my paycheck.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
except, GM has small cars coming out for this upcoming fuel crisis... and fuel efficient ones too...

Cruze: 40mpg... no one can touch that without diesel or a hybrid.
Volt
Beat
Terrain
Equinox


those are just the 30+ mpg vehicles GM has coming out.
So GM is going to be next summer where Toyota was last summer? Good for them, but they're a little late to wake up and smell the coffee. And they still have to find a way to turn a profit unless, as I already mentioned, Obama is going to just keep handing them my paycheck.

show me the following in Toyota...
a small CUV that gets 32mpg
a small sedan that gets 40mpg (non hybrid)


 

Ktulu

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2000
4,354
0
0
Originally posted by: VinylxScratches
I'm pretty sure you can get 40 MPG out of a Corolla.

You can squeeze out 40 on a Cobalt too but it's not rated for 40 by the EPA.
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: evident
From Autoblog:

Part of the reason for Toyota's optimism is due to the Japanese automaker's May sales. On the surface, sales were putrid, with a decline of 40% versus May 2008. But last May 2008 was a far better month for Toyota than it was many of its competitors, making the 40% figure a bit misleading. Toyota's sales actually increased by 21% when compared to April 2009.

That's awesome, GM's sales are up 11% and Ford is up 20% compared to last April too. It's not just Toyota. But of course the media has to spin it so that it always looks like Toyota can not fail.

I wouldn't say the guys over at Autoblog are your typcial "media". They are pretty big Domestic Fanboys...but I think they try to be as objective as possible with this stuff.
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
American cars STILL have no resale value.

Coworker just sold his 2000 Tacoma with 110k for $8k

Your coworker found quite the sucker. Resale values aren't always rational and are a pretty crappy metric to judge a new vehicle.

Um...Tacoma's have very high resalve values. My friend sold his 2001 Tacoma, regular cab, I4, stick, 4x4. He took the money and got a 2000 Tundra extended cab, 4x4, V8, auto and had nearly $1K left over after the deal.

But to use a Tacoma as an example of how much better foreign vehicles resale is not really fair as it has one of the best by far. That's like trying to say all Chevy's are fast because a Corvette is a Chevy.
 

davestar

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2001
1,787
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
This is why I laugh when people say big vehicles were killing GM. Small and medium sized cars arent selling either.

so because the current economy has brought down sales of all makes/models of vehicles for 2008, that proves that GM's multi-decade downward trajectory has nothing to do with their business model?
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
show me the following in Toyota...
a small CUV that gets 32mpg
a small sedan that gets 40mpg (non hybrid)
Why a non-hybrid? What's wrong with hybrids? If I can buy a hybrid that costs as much or less than your small non-hybrid sedan, yet gets better mileage, what is wrong with buying a hybrid? Nor do I see anything that indicates where the Cruze would get 40+ mpg, even by 2011. The only information I see on mileage guesses:
No specifications have been released for the US powertrain, but Chevrolet executives have hinted more than once that the fuel economy will be better than buyers expect?which would put the Chevy Cruze into 35-mpg territory or better.
Source

 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
That point is though, GM/Ford/American companies aren't not turning a profit because the cars suck, they aren't turning a profit because the costs to manufacture the cars are so much higher than their competitors.

The idiot OP never made that analysis in any of his post.
Thank you for using your brain at least.
 

Ktulu

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2000
4,354
0
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
show me the following in Toyota...
a small CUV that gets 32mpg
a small sedan that gets 40mpg (non hybrid)
Why a non-hybrid? What's wrong with hybrids? If I can buy a hybrid that costs as much or less than your small non-hybrid sedan, yet gets better mileage, what is wrong with buying a hybrid? Nor do I see anything that indicates where the Cruze would get 40+ mpg, even by 2011. The only information I see on mileage guesses:
No specifications have been released for the US powertrain, but Chevrolet executives have hinted more than once that the fuel economy will be better than buyers expect?which would put the Chevy Cruze into 35-mpg territory or better.
Source

Exactly how hard did you research the Cruze?

http://www.edmunds.com/insidel.../News/articleId=129326
In Europe, the Cruze will be offered with a choice of four-cylinder gas and diesel engines. For the U.S. market, GM intends to fit a turbocharged, direct-injection 1.4-liter that will deliver up to 40 mpg in highway driving.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Exactly how hard did you research the Cruze?

http://www.edmunds.com/insidel.../News/articleId=129326
In Europe, the Cruze will be offered with a choice of four-cylinder gas and diesel engines. For the U.S. market, GM intends to fit a turbocharged, direct-injection 1.4-liter that will deliver up to 40 mpg in highway driving.
First page of Google. I suppose it's speculation either way since the car won't even be on the market until the 2011 model year.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Exactly how hard did you research the Cruze?

http://www.edmunds.com/insidel.../News/articleId=129326
In Europe, the Cruze will be offered with a choice of four-cylinder gas and diesel engines. For the U.S. market, GM intends to fit a turbocharged, direct-injection 1.4-liter that will deliver up to 40 mpg in highway driving.
First page of Google. I suppose it's speculation either way since the car won't even be on the market until the 2011 model year.

uh, thats 1 year from now... and people were saying the Equinox/Terrain were going to get 30mpg highway about a year ago, and then just recently GM said that they had made changes and upped the FE to 32mpg highway...
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
show me the following in Toyota...
a small CUV that gets 32mpg
a small sedan that gets 40mpg (non hybrid)
Why a non-hybrid? What's wrong with hybrids? If I can buy a hybrid that costs as much or less than your small non-hybrid sedan, yet gets better mileage, what is wrong with buying a hybrid? Nor do I see anything that indicates where the Cruze would get 40+ mpg, even by 2011. The only information I see on mileage guesses:
No specifications have been released for the US powertrain, but Chevrolet executives have hinted more than once that the fuel economy will be better than buyers expect?which would put the Chevy Cruze into 35-mpg territory or better.
Source

Exactly how hard did you research the Cruze?

http://www.edmunds.com/insidel.../News/articleId=129326
In Europe, the Cruze will be offered with a choice of four-cylinder gas and diesel engines. For the U.S. market, GM intends to fit a turbocharged, direct-injection 1.4-liter that will deliver up to 40 mpg in highway driving.

Almost identical marketing scheme GM put out with the "Volt"! And guess where the Volt is at right now! Did I hear someone say 'scrap"?
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
uh, thats 1 year from now...
You never answered my question: why does it have to be a non-hybrid? And what is the MSRP of the Cruze supposed to be?
and people were saying the Equinox/Terrain were going to get 30mpg highway about a year ago, and then just recently GM said that they had made changes and upped the FE to 32mpg highway...
Wow. So?
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
uh, thats 1 year from now...
You never answered my question: why does it have to be a non-hybrid? And what is the MSRP of the Cruze supposed to be?
and people were saying the Equinox/Terrain were going to get 30mpg highway about a year ago, and then just recently GM said that they had made changes and upped the FE to 32mpg highway...
Wow. So?

GM hasn't announced pricing on the Cruze yet. It's hard to say what they're going to do with it though. It will probably be close to all the others starting around $16k (figure current compacts are mostly starting at around $15.5k, so a little more considering it's a year or so away)
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
uh, thats 1 year from now...
You never answered my question: why does it have to be a non-hybrid? And what is the MSRP of the Cruze supposed to be?
and people were saying the Equinox/Terrain were going to get 30mpg highway about a year ago, and then just recently GM said that they had made changes and upped the FE to 32mpg highway...
Wow. So?

Why not compare apple to apples. Comparing a hybrid to a non-hybrid is stupid. If GM can get 40mpg out of a gas engine, but toyota hybrids get the same milage, who really has the better technology?
BTW, the 1.4l turbo may get up to 45MPG. http://consumerguideauto.howst...11-chevrolet-cruze.htm
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Why not compare apple to apples. Comparing a hybrid to a non-hybrid is stupid. If GM can get 40mpg out of a gas engine, but toyota hybrids get the same milage, who really has the better technology?
In economic terms, the better car is the one that costs less to own, period. Whether or not it's a hybrid makes no difference. If I have two $20k cars and one is a hybrid getting 50 mpg and the other is not a hybrid and gets 40 mpg, all else being equal, it obviously makes sense to buy the hybrid. Even as an engineer, I don't give a rat's if the engine in my car is more efficient than any other car: I'm worried about the bottom line.
Yeah, seems like the numbers are completely inconsistent. I'll believe it when I have a working car sitting in front of me.

 

Ktulu

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2000
4,354
0
0
Originally posted by: Jiggz
Almost identical marketing scheme GM put out with the "Volt"! And guess where the Volt is at right now! Did I hear someone say 'scrap"?

Wait, What?

GM is going full steam with the Volt they've just started building near production models just before the beginning of June.

Is there an article I missed about the Volt being scrapped?

:confused:
 

fornax

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
6,866
0
76
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
show me the following in Toyota...
a small CUV that gets 32mpg
a small sedan that gets 40mpg (non hybrid)

My friend's 99 Corolla gets 42 mpg on the freeway and 34 mpg in town. You are so last decade. Besides, it will take a few years to actually find out what the true gas mileage is and how successful the car is. I'm sure you're aware that there are at least 10 cars that were complete crap but were rated "best new car" (or something like that) by JDP & Assoc.

 

fornax

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
6,866
0
76
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Exactly how hard did you research the Cruze?

http://www.edmunds.com/insidel.../News/articleId=129326
In Europe, the Cruze will be offered with a choice of four-cylinder gas and diesel engines. For the U.S. market, GM intends to fit a turbocharged, direct-injection 1.4-liter that will deliver up to 40 mpg in highway driving.

1.4 liter? Are you serious? Then it should be getting 50-55 mpg, not 40. A friend's 99 Corolla (1.8 liter) gets 42mpg. I often rent small cars when I go to Europe (last rental was a VW Polo), and I swear that thing was running on air :)
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: fornax
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
show me the following in Toyota...
a small CUV that gets 32mpg
a small sedan that gets 40mpg (non hybrid)

My friend's 99 Corolla gets 42 mpg on the freeway and 34 mpg in town. You are so last decade. Besides, it will take a few years to actually find out what the true gas mileage is and how successful the car is. I'm sure you're aware that there are at least 10 cars that were complete crap but were rated "best new car" (or something like that) by JDP & Assoc.

Enter 1999 Totota Corolla here and officially, it gets much worse than you state.


Direct link.


It's more than likely your friends driving habits that show such high mileage. He/she could drive any similar mpg car and get about the same mileage. My 07 Cobalt coup was up to 39mpg on the highway with 4 people inside, the AC on and cruising at 70 mph.


Originally posted by: fornax

1.4 liter? Are you serious? Then it should be getting 50-55 mpg, not 40. A friend's 99 Corolla (1.8 liter) gets 42mpg. I often rent small cars when I go to Europe (last rental was a VW Polo), and I swear that thing was running on air :)


By that logic, we could go down to a .5 liter and get 100mpg. Of course, there are power limitations involved. And for the record, my father still has a Geo Metro that gets 60 mpg with it's 1.0 liter 3 cylinder. Of course, you add all of the required safety stuff included on today's cars and it wouldn't do nearly as well.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Lots of people still want and need to buy trucks like people who are farmers, do construction work or do anything where they need to move or haul things in a truck. Some people like trucks for a second vehicle for those times when one needs to haul something like a refrigerator or lumber. I dont see most of the foreign manufacturers selling well for this market.

I have said this before but what the big three should do is just quit selling cars to make the price for new cars rise due to a low supply level.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Skoorb
GM couldn't even turn a profit during the fantasy economy we had until 2007. To be profitable 2-3 years from now as they claim they can be, they're going to have to do a hell of a lot better than they have been doing.
)

Exactly... They were losing money in the best of economies... They need to die.

Hopefully after bankruptcy and re-strucuring they can put out a decent car at a decent price. Up until now they have only put out shit cars at a decent price, or decent cars at a too high price.