Nov 26, 2005
15,194
403
126
Maxtor u320 Can this drive be that slow? I don't ever remember it being that slow before. I recently tossed out my Raptor 150 for my SCSI again and it seems slower. Granted it being an older SCSI drive but back then even the Raptor was on par or below its performance and this is below that stat.
 

Elixer

Lifer
May 7, 2002
10,371
762
126
Hmm, I thought the max transfer rate for these drives were around 98MB/sec? This is a 10K RPM drive right?

Which drivers & SCSI card you using?

 
Nov 26, 2005
15,194
403
126
How will the Fujitsu compare?

EDIT: as in transfer rates, access time, etc?

It is more responsive than my Raptor but I have to say it loads UT3 a bit slower... what would you guess it is?
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Originally posted by: BTRY B 529th FA BN
How will the Fujitsu compare?

Begin read times around 135MB/S decaying to just above 90MB/S IIRC.

It's hard to run on mine because the proxy cache tends to screw things up making it look like I have a 1400GB ram disk. :shocked:

EDIT: Desktop performance is definitely better on the Fujitsu's. It should load levels fast! I have Dell Precision WS with a pair of MAX (the revision before MBA) no raid - just onboard SAS - and it's very snappy. Definitely quicker than a raptor...
 
Nov 26, 2005
15,194
403
126
Originally posted by: Rubycon
Originally posted by: BTRY B 529th FA BN
How will the Fujitsu compare?

Begin read times around 135MB/S decaying to just above 90MB/S IIRC.

It's hard to run on mine because the proxy cache tends to screw things up making it look like I have a 1400GB ram disk. :shocked:

EDIT: Desktop performance is definitely better on the Fujitsu's. It should load levels fast! I have Dell Precision WS with a pair of MAX (the revision before MBA) no raid - just onboard SAS - and it's very snappy. Definitely quicker than a raptor...

If its all or more than I am expecting it to be, i may just get another!