Hi All,
Recently purchased a 3400+ Clawhammer and was sent a CO stepping core. I will be sending it back and was about to hunt down a 3400+ CG Clawhammer when I started reading posts about the 3400+ Newcastles OCing much better. I know the differences in L2 cache and stock clock speeds.
I'm curious what folks have gotten out of these two CPUs while OCing w/ air cooling. If the Newcastle can hold it's 200 MHz advantage while OCed on air then it seems like the better buy for a gaming (primarily) system. If they both top out at close to the same speed then the 3400+ Clawhammer seems like the better buy given it's 1MB L2 cache. I don't want to get into watercooling at this point. Both chips are selling for about the same price right now.
Whatever I get will be partnered w/ the following: DFI LANparty UT nF3, 1 GB (2x512) PDP 3200+XBXL, BFG GeForce 6800 OC and a 160 GB Western Digital SATA HDD.
Thanks for the information!
Hop
Recently purchased a 3400+ Clawhammer and was sent a CO stepping core. I will be sending it back and was about to hunt down a 3400+ CG Clawhammer when I started reading posts about the 3400+ Newcastles OCing much better. I know the differences in L2 cache and stock clock speeds.
I'm curious what folks have gotten out of these two CPUs while OCing w/ air cooling. If the Newcastle can hold it's 200 MHz advantage while OCed on air then it seems like the better buy for a gaming (primarily) system. If they both top out at close to the same speed then the 3400+ Clawhammer seems like the better buy given it's 1MB L2 cache. I don't want to get into watercooling at this point. Both chips are selling for about the same price right now.
Whatever I get will be partnered w/ the following: DFI LANparty UT nF3, 1 GB (2x512) PDP 3200+XBXL, BFG GeForce 6800 OC and a 160 GB Western Digital SATA HDD.
Thanks for the information!
Hop