Superwormy
Golden Member
- Feb 7, 2001
- 1,637
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Pariah
No, it actually is 3fps.
Here's a clear non-cropped photo.
http://ixbt.com/video2/parhelia512/faa16x/3dmark_faa16x.jpg
I question the usefulness of a "feature" that scores 3fps. Of course 16x FSAA would take some incredible fillrate.
Originally posted by: andreasl
If you want a lowdown on the FAA-16x mode then look at this graph:
FAA-16x
It seems that it sorts out only those pixels that are aliased and stores them in a buffer and then performs the anti-aliasing on them. This should allow almost full speed since only a few % of the pixels are 'fixed'. Or am I way off base here?
That's rather poor considering it has almost double the physical memory bandwidth. Also I wonder if nVidia has Detonator5 drivers up their sleeve and it wouldn't be the first time we've seen a large performance gain from them.They say it is 20% faster than 4600 with current drivers.
Originally posted by: BFG10K
They say it is 20% faster than 4600 with current drivers.
That's rather poor considering it has almost double the physical memory bandwidth. Also I wonder if nVidia has Detonator5 drivers up their sleeve and it wouldn't be the first time we've seen a large performance gain from them.
who gives a crap if Nvidia releases Detonator5 drivers, they still have not got there detonator4 drivers stable! I want a stable card like Matrox! Hopefully the price will be resonable!Also I wonder if nVidia has Detonator5 drivers up their sleeve and it wouldn't be the first time we've seen a large performance gain from them.
who gives a crap if Nvidia releases Detonator5 drivers, they still have not got there detonator4 drivers stable!