Matrix Revolutions really tumbles second weekend gross receipts.......

C'DaleRider

Guest
Jan 13, 2000
3,048
0
0
First weekend, Matrix:Revolutions grossed $48M, second weekend only $16M. Guess it has no legs at all. Elf, on the other hand, dropped only $4M from one weekend to the next..........from opening the same weekend as Revolutions with $31M to the second weekend of release at $27M, and topped the charts for this weekend; Master and Commander came in second with $25.7M in receipts, and Revolutions finished a distant third.

Kind of disappointing for such a hyped movie.
 

OREOSpeedwagon

Diamond Member
May 30, 2001
8,485
1
81
i thought revolutions seemed really underhyped, not near as much as reloaded. i saw it opening night and i think there were about 15 people in the theater.
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
There's talk about Warner rushing out the Revolutions DVD because of the poor theater performance.
 

EvilYoda

Lifer
Apr 1, 2001
21,198
9
81
wow...that really is a huge drop, even despite what people had expected...oh well, I still liked it. And the faster I can watch it at home, the better. :D
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
yeah, reloaded was hyped so much, then again it was three years later, and it was semi disapointing, hope revolutions turns out better i'm going on tuesday to see it
 

jdini76

Platinum Member
Mar 16, 2001
2,468
0
0
Saw it (again) last night. The theatre was practicly empty.

anybody have any stats on the success of a movie whos sequal comes out in the same year...ala Back To The Future II & III?

Looks like it s a common trend with movie sequals released in the same year:

Back to the Future 7/3/1985 $210,609,762
Back to the Future II 11/22/1989 $118,450,002
Back to the Future III 5/24/1990 $87,666,629

Matrix, The 3/31/1999 $65,000,000 $171,479,930
Matrix Reloaded, The 5/15/2003 $281,553,689
Matrix Revolutions, The 11/5/2003 $102,595,000 (still in theatres)
 

Growltiger

Golden Member
Oct 11, 1999
1,924
0
0
They did a lot of advertising early when the Reloaded DVD was released, then it tapered off. I haven't really seen a preview in a while now.

 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
Revolutions sucked, that's why it did so poorly

I loved the first one, Reloaded was good, but this one just plain sucked. I'm finding myself telling friends to wait for the DVD.
 

jdini76

Platinum Member
Mar 16, 2001
2,468
0
0
Looks like it s a common trend with movie sequals released in the same year:

Back to the Future 7/3/1985 $210,609,762
Back to the Future II 11/22/1989 $118,450,002
Back to the Future III 5/24/1990 $87,666,629 (technicaly not the same year, but you know what I mean)

Matrix, The 3/31/1999 $65,000,000 $171,479,930
Matrix Reloaded, The 5/15/2003 $281,553,689
Matrix Revolutions, The 11/5/2003 $102,595,000 (still in theatres)
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Revolutions sucked, that's why it did so poorly.

True that. The secret of its suckiness couldn't be kept under wraps.

 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: MAME
Well it made $100mil in two weeks. It's impressive nonetheless

The current record for $100million is 3 days. $100million in two weeks isnt all that impressive for an expensive blockbuster movie like Revolutions.
 

CQuinn

Golden Member
May 31, 2000
1,656
0
0
Back to the Future III 5/24/1990 $87,666,629 (technicaly not the same year, but you know what I mean)

Actually I think your point still holds, weren't both BTTF sequals filmed at the same time?


I really enjoyed Revolutions, but its a good idea to watch the Reloaded DVD a day or two beforehand, to
catch a lot of details that might have been forgotten in the interim.
 

CTho9305

Elite Member
Jul 26, 2000
9,214
1
81
When everyone you know tells you it wasn't a good movie, you can generally expect reduced raking in of cash ;)
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,167
18,772
146
They blew it when they had Neo possess super-natural powers outside the matrix. It became impossible to suspend disbelief after that. IMHO that ruined the whole series for me.
 

jdini76

Platinum Member
Mar 16, 2001
2,468
0
0
Originally posted by: CQuinn
Back to the Future III 5/24/1990 $87,666,629 (technicaly not the same year, but you know what I mean)

Actually I think your point still holds, weren't both BTTF sequals filmed at the same time?

yes they were. And with scripts like these, this is really the only way to handle it. IMO because the time lines were so close together.

 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Originally posted by: Amused
They blew it when they had Neo possess super-natural powers outside the matrix. It became impossible to suspend disbelief after that. IMHO that ruined the whole series for me.

He could only detect and influence machines in the real world. He was connected to the machine source, it wasn't that hard to buy. What ruined the series for me was the piss-poor dialogue, wardrobe, and pacing of the last two movies.
 

nan0bug

Banned
Apr 22, 2003
3,142
0
0
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Originally posted by: Amused
They blew it when they had Neo possess super-natural powers outside the matrix. It became impossible to suspend disbelief after that. IMHO that ruined the whole series for me.

He could only detect and influence machines in the real world. He was connected to the machine source, it wasn't that hard to buy. What ruined the series for me was the piss-poor dialogue, wardrobe, and pacing of the last two movies.

What ruined the series for me was the down-syndrome bag boy who had more on-screen time in the 3rd movie than Neo... and the fact that by the third installment, jacking in and out of the matrix was routine as opposed to exciting... or maybe it was the cheezy Agent Smith "THIS IS MY WORLD!" (cue corny-not-so-special-effect of Agent Smith on a blue-screened-rope swooping down to knock over Neo) part..

There were too many things wrong with the third movie to list. It pisses me off because they took what could have been a really good end to the series and treated it like an afterthought.

Maybe if they would have cast Gary Coleman as the down-syndrome bag boy it might have been somewhat worthwhile to watch. Maybe.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,167
18,772
146
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Originally posted by: Amused
They blew it when they had Neo possess super-natural powers outside the matrix. It became impossible to suspend disbelief after that. IMHO that ruined the whole series for me.

He could only detect and influence machines in the real world. He was connected to the machine source, it wasn't that hard to buy. What ruined the series for me was the piss-poor dialogue, wardrobe, and pacing of the last two movies.

Connected by what? 802.11b???

Sorry, but unless he was jacked in, he was not connected.
 

Snapster

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2001
3,916
0
0
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
i thought revolutions seemed really underhyped, not near as much as reloaded. i saw it opening night and i think there were about 15 people in the theater.

Yeh. The Wachowski (sp?) brothers said they didn't want to hype the 3rd one as they won't need too. They said they'd name a date, and they would come.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Originally posted by: Amused
They blew it when they had Neo possess super-natural powers outside the matrix. It became impossible to suspend disbelief after that. IMHO that ruined the whole series for me.

He could only detect and influence machines in the real world. He was connected to the machine source, it wasn't that hard to buy. What ruined the series for me was the piss-poor dialogue, wardrobe, and pacing of the last two movies.

Connected by what? 802.11b???

Sorry, but unless he was jacked in, he was not connected.

The oracle explicitly stated he was connected. Obviously there was some sort of wireless deal going on with him being able to be in the matrix w/o a hardline. If he had started wall-walking or flying in the real world I'd be onboard with you, but the nature of his real world abilities fall in line with the movie's reality without too much of a stretch.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,167
18,772
146
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Originally posted by: Amused
They blew it when they had Neo possess super-natural powers outside the matrix. It became impossible to suspend disbelief after that. IMHO that ruined the whole series for me.

He could only detect and influence machines in the real world. He was connected to the machine source, it wasn't that hard to buy. What ruined the series for me was the piss-poor dialogue, wardrobe, and pacing of the last two movies.

Connected by what? 802.11b???

Sorry, but unless he was jacked in, he was not connected.

The oracle explicitly stated he was connected. Obviously there was some sort of wireless deal going on with him being able to be in the matrix w/o a hardline. If he had started wall-walking or flying in the real world I'd be onboard with you, but the nature of his real world abilities fall in line with the movie's reality without too much of a stretch.

The only explaination is supernatural. There is no other way he could see when blind, and stop machines with his hands.

It ruined the whole plot for me. At first, I thought it was going to be a "matrix within a matrix" sort of plot like The Thirteenth Floor. When it wasn't, all suspension of disbelief came crashing down.