DrPizza
Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Also, I've come up with a solution - or at least a damn good approximation, using pre-calculus & a bit of chemistry. We'll pretend we're pouring out less than an atom at a time.
Let's start with Avogadro's number. About 6 x 10^23 molecules per mole. A gram of water is about 18 grams. So that we over-estimate the number of atoms in paint, let's say that a gallon of paint is 5 kilograms (about 11 pounds). That's 277ish, call it 300 moles of water. 3 atoms per mole & we have 3 * 300 * 6 x 10^23 atoms. =5.4 x 10^26 atoms. Let's call it 10^27 atoms. So, if we mix it atom by atom, we need to figure out what [(10^27-1)/(10^27)]^(10^27) is. Set it equal to x. take the log of both sides & apply the rules of logs & you have (10^27)[log(10^27-1) - log (10^27)]=log x
After a few fun steps, log x = -0.43429448
So, x = 10^-0.43429448
x = .3678794412
Awwww, mjrpes, you're not supposed to give the OP the answer in that form.
Let's start with Avogadro's number. About 6 x 10^23 molecules per mole. A gram of water is about 18 grams. So that we over-estimate the number of atoms in paint, let's say that a gallon of paint is 5 kilograms (about 11 pounds). That's 277ish, call it 300 moles of water. 3 atoms per mole & we have 3 * 300 * 6 x 10^23 atoms. =5.4 x 10^26 atoms. Let's call it 10^27 atoms. So, if we mix it atom by atom, we need to figure out what [(10^27-1)/(10^27)]^(10^27) is. Set it equal to x. take the log of both sides & apply the rules of logs & you have (10^27)[log(10^27-1) - log (10^27)]=log x
After a few fun steps, log x = -0.43429448
So, x = 10^-0.43429448
x = .3678794412
Awwww, mjrpes, you're not supposed to give the OP the answer in that form.
