Originally posted by: Sunner
IMO that makes you an extremely snesitive person, and frankly, the whole world just can't adapt to a few very sensitive people. And no, that's not meant as a flame or anything.Originally posted by: jjsole Actually, when I first learned about computer components in '99 I thought these terms were kind of crude.
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: Sunner
IMO that makes you an extremely snesitive person, and frankly, the whole world just can't adapt to a few very sensitive people. And no, that's not meant as a flame or anything.Originally posted by: jjsole Actually, when I first learned about computer components in '99 I thought these terms were kind of crude.
I never said i was offended, but that it sounded crude the first time I learned it.
Male/female, not crude, nipples, not crude, but master/slave conjurred up a crude image when I read it in a hd manual, because when you normally hear the terms together, its usually referring to black history or s&m/dominatrix stuff etc.
If someone doesn't think of previous definitions/references when learning something, then maybe they are just braindead.
Originally posted by: Macro2
Yet another attempt to denigrate the white man. Destroy the white man.
So says Michael Savage
Originally posted by: jdurg
I think there's some incredible irony in this whole thing. The people who have become offended by the master/slave designation of hardware are probably the people who would like to see ignorance and stubborness stamped out. However, by demanding that the master/slave designations be changed, they are the ones who are ignorant and stubborn. (Not to mention egotistical as well. If they think that master/slave only refers to the slavery period in the United States, they fail to realize that the period of slavery in the USA was MUCH shorter than the periods of slavery which existed/exist everywhere else in the world).
They are ignorant in that they don't realize that the term "master" doesn't mean "white man who beats black slave." It means dominant, or superior device. They also don't realize that "slave" doesn't mean "black man who is whipped and beaten by his white owner." It means subordinate, or second-tier device.
They are stubborn in that they refuse to accept the fact that the master/slave designation in no way is meant to be taken in terms of human beings. These devices are not human beings. They are pieces of electronic equipment. If they were jobs in a company which were designated master/slave, then yes, they have a valid complaint. As it stands now, they have no valid complaint and need to wake up and do some research.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jdurg
I think there's some incredible irony in this whole thing. The people who have become offended by the master/slave designation of hardware are probably the people who would like to see ignorance and stubborness stamped out. However, by demanding that the master/slave designations be changed, they are the ones who are ignorant and stubborn. (Not to mention egotistical as well. If they think that master/slave only refers to the slavery period in the United States, they fail to realize that the period of slavery in the USA was MUCH shorter than the periods of slavery which existed/exist everywhere else in the world).
They are ignorant in that they don't realize that the term "master" doesn't mean "white man who beats black slave." It means dominant, or superior device. They also don't realize that "slave" doesn't mean "black man who is whipped and beaten by his white owner." It means subordinate, or second-tier device.
They are stubborn in that they refuse to accept the fact that the master/slave designation in no way is meant to be taken in terms of human beings. These devices are not human beings. They are pieces of electronic equipment. If they were jobs in a company which were designated master/slave, then yes, they have a valid complaint. As it stands now, they have no valid complaint and need to wake up and do some research.
Excellent post jdurg.
This is yet another item to have the rest of the world laugh at the U.S. The idiots in Power Positions really ought to examine and pick the battles they choice to fight better, they're sending us back to the Caves.
Originally posted by: Duvie
WE NEED TO SEE WHO ARE THE REAL RACIST HERE......
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by: Duvie
WE NEED TO SEE WHO ARE THE REAL RACIST HERE......
Changing the name of an electrical component is a racial attack on who?
Originally posted by:BingBongWongFooey
I believe he's saying that the people that made the complaint are the racist ones, since they turned a pretty stupid thing into a battle of the races. I kinda agree, although I wouldn't call them racist, I'd just call them whiners or oversensitive or just stupid.
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by:BingBongWongFooey
I believe he's saying that the people that made the complaint are the racist ones, since they turned a pretty stupid thing into a battle of the races. I kinda agree, although I wouldn't call them racist, I'd just call them whiners or oversensitive or just stupid.
So maybe they are oversensitive (whiners and stupid I won't touch) - but they are obviously not the only ones. Again if a sizable portion of people find a term offensive - no biggie to change it. The english language has went through many changes along these lines and I would be very surprised if hard drives cost more if the manuals were written using different terminology.
Originally posted by: jjsole
Actually, when I first learned about computer components in '99 I thought these terms were kind of crude.
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
It's true that the words master and slave are rarely used anymore and someone who isn't into technical stuff might be surprised to see them in use.
HOWEVER, that doesn't mean that it's wrong in any way. Master and slave are pretty simple, self-explanatory words, that had meaning before Africans were enslaved in America, and continue to retain those meanings today.
We should outlaw the words "whip" and "plantation" too!![]()
Damn straight. The words existed before the United State's period of slavery. It was descriptive of that period and what used. It is also descriptive of the relationship of the two devices sharing the IDE channel and was used. It is also descriptive of man and machine, love, and many other situations. "I KNOW! Let's stop using the word 'slave' just because human slavery is wrong! Let's PRETEND that there is a word that means the same thing except it does not apply to humans." Now how do we describe modern slavery?Originally posted by: jdurg
I think there's some incredible irony in this whole thing. The people who have become offended by the master/slave designation of hardware are probably the people who would like to see ignorance and stubborness stamped out. However, by demanding that the master/slave designations be changed, they are the ones who are ignorant and stubborn. (Not to mention egotistical as well. If they think that master/slave only refers to the slavery period in the United States, they fail to realize that the period of slavery in the USA was MUCH shorter than the periods of slavery which existed/exist everywhere else in the world).
They are ignorant in that they don't realize that the term "master" doesn't mean "white man who beats black slave." It means dominant, or superior device. They also don't realize that "slave" doesn't mean "black man who is whipped and beaten by his white owner." It means subordinate, or second-tier device.
They are stubborn in that they refuse to accept the fact that the master/slave designation in no way is meant to be taken in terms of human beings. These devices are not human beings. They are pieces of electronic equipment. If they were jobs in a company which were designated master/slave, then yes, they have a valid complaint. As it stands now, they have no valid complaint and need to wake up and do some research.
These people obviously have no grasp of the English language. I call it "stubborn" and "ignorant" to proceed and go through "exahustive" efforts without putting the effort enough to learn English when their own actions make it painfully obvious. It's like trying to tell Einstein that E=MC^2 is wrong because eggs do not come from two moo-cows and hoping the rest of the world is stupid enough to agree.Originally posted by: Ardan
I would just simply say it is crazy for him to think that, but I won't put words in the person offended by saying they are stubborn and ignorant. I would say it is right to think he or she is ultra-sensitive and probably doesn't understand the true meaning of the words but that doesn't mean they are thinking of only when the US had slavery. We have to acknowledge that slavery is not dead (as I know you hinted at); it just doesn't exist in the same way that we remember it to exist. We don't know much about the person, but we do know that they are at least foolish to be offended by it and that it is even more foolish for California to take one man or woman out of 90,000 with an outrageous complaint and run with it.
The focus of the nonsense about wanting it changed should be on the officials because he just simply filed an complaint and they decided to do all that craziness. I would go as far to say that they are more naive and unaware of the underlying parts of a computer to have some of them suggest not buying parts with the names 'Master' and 'Slave.' If they knew what they were talking about, they would have dismissed the complaint.
--------
This is my opinion; you do not have to agree but you do have to be intelligent.
The word "slave" is the issue we have because the word is not what is offensive. That's the events in human history you're thinking about. The word existed before. How can someone be offended by correct use of the word? Either you mean you can see how morons assume that "slave" refers back to one major historical era or you yourself assume its origins to be the same. Life is slave to the Sun and the Earth. Machinery is slave to mankind. Even animals. Horses and dogs have "masters." "Equal rights" has no place here. The word currently exists, has a defined meaning and that's that. It is not "slang" There is no reason to use a different word when a perfectly adequate word exists. That's just childish.Originally posted by: ronnn
Hate to say it, but I can see how it could be found offensive. Certainly not a part of the human experience to be proud of. Besides if as all of you say it shouldn't matter, why all the resistance to change? Why not call them George Bush - Tony Blair🙂
Originally posted by: ronnn
Still do not see the big problem with changing names. If a certain name brings up uncomfortable or negative and offensive connotations for some group - don't use it. This has nothing to do with making a negative comment on the self centered, white american male.
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by: Duvie
WE NEED TO SEE WHO ARE THE REAL RACIST HERE......
Changing the name of an electrical component is a racial attack on who?
Originally posted by: CZroe
I'M OFFENDED THAT CIVILIZATION USED THE WORD SLAVERY TO DESCRIBE THE HUMAN INJUSTICE THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD! THE WORD "SLAVE" IS WHAT OFFENDS ME! NOT THE INJUSTICE ITSELF! THE WORD SHOULD BE STRICKEN FROM ALL FURTHER USE BECAUSE OF WHAT IT WAS USED TO DESCRIBE IN THE PAST!
![]()
Oh well when they change the terminology, boycott all things electrical.![]()
I don't think it's "no biggie" to change it. You're talking about revamping terminology used throughout the entire technical industry. Furthermore, AFAIK, these "oversensitive" people hardly amount to a "sizable portion".Originally posted by: ronnn
So maybe they are oversensitive (whiners and stupid I won't touch) - but they are obviously not the only ones. Again if a sizable portion of people find a term offensive - no biggie to change it. The english language has went through many changes along these lines and I would be very surprised if hard drives cost more if the manuals were written using different terminology.