Amazing to hear people shit all over the OP for passing along a good deal.
They are not shitting all over the OP.
They "shit" all over ME3's ending - with reasons - but that's about it, since that's about what people do when it comes with ME3. I could enumerate many other parts of ME3 that just didn't make sense (lack of details or foreshadowing, or connection with the prior two games) or was very badly presented (such as the intro, or the "let's add an out-of-the-blue ninja wanna be villain guy" pseudo-antagonist experiment) that overall makes it a mediocre title in the trilogy. And especially so by "BioWare's standards", if there's any of that left.
There's still some of ME3 though that I believe was good enough (Quarian/Geth conflict and Genophage arcs conclusions, several character progression stories also coming to a conclusion such as Thane's, Miranda's, Wrex's or EDI's, and a few others). As a side note my previous post (well I) wasn't "defending" nor saying that I somehow thought that ME3's ending wasn't that bad. It IS an abysmal ending (I do refer to it as a singular ending with slight variations that in the end doesn't matter anyway).
I absolutely do detest ME3's "epic conclusion of the trilogy and Shepard's journey" to a gut-wrenching level (still to this day). I'm just saying... there's worst games out there both in terms of game-play (fun, or lack thereof) and story (lack of originality, inspiration, quality, complexity, pace, presentation, continuity, et cetera). And that - overall - I do believe that for merely $13 then buying ME3 isn't a bad deal at all.