• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Maryland the next state to pass strict gun law

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
monovillage said:
You asked and Fenixgoon supplied the studies that refute in total all your claims. You respond by moving the goalposts and whine: shoulda, woulda, coulda. Unless you can provide an accurate scientific study backing up your claim you just got your ignorant ass handed to you.
Click to expand...

Lol, his post states the AWB had no affect, the report said it was hard to gauge and ranged from a small impact to none, that doesn't confirm what he said. I then explained why the results might have been what they were and suggested a new study without the law being handicapped.

But your ignorant ass can't read (must be the cataracts) and you aren't smart enough to add anything worthy to the discussion so my expectations aren't that high to begin with.

But hey! Thanks for your usual, add nothing to the discussion, comment. I'm sure everyone refreshes the screen waiting to see what your next witty retort might be./s
 
Well, look at california. we've been handicapped to 10 rounds and had a fairly restrictive list of cosmetic features that make a weapon more deadly. How have we done here?

oakland, richmond, and stockton not to mention LA STILL have violent crime with guns. Is it less than before? Are we ignoring other factors? The causes of these crimes? Drugs? Economic conditions? Decreasing police presence? etc...

Look at Chicago and DC, and in some respects NY with their bans. Effective? Why or why not?

What are the causes for this violence? Lets start there and address that...
 
Lithium381 said:
Well, look at california. we've been handicapped to 10 rounds and had a fairly restrictive list of cosmetic features that make a weapon more deadly. How have we done here?

oakland, richmond, and stockton not to mention LA STILL have violent crime with guns. Is it less than before? Are we ignoring other factors? The causes of these crimes? Drugs? Economic conditions? Decreasing police presence? etc...

Look at Chicago and DC, and in some respects NY with their bans. Effective? Why or why not?

What are the causes for this violence? Lets start there and address that...
Click to expand...

That makes way too much sense.

Lets just ban guns instead.
 
Chuck_v said:
So now I carry three ten round clips instead of two fifteen round clips.
Click to expand...

Ya cause I get in gun fights all the time I mean you never know.

I'm kidding of course but magazine bans are irrelevant. It makes the democrats feel good but as for small or large magazines, banning them is stupid since the lawmakers know naught about how guns work. Magazine bans are purely due to ignorance.

It doesn't really matter how many rounds they carry, reloading isn't a big deal, you just need to carry more magazines. Politicians doing armchair analysis of a crime spree is just about the dumbest justification for any law.

I would allow any recommendation the police say on the matter, even if it was exactly the same recommendations but I bet you they have some different ideas.

Magazines are just spring boxes and its very dumb to regulate them. Even if they banned detachable magazines someone could easily fashion their own clip to reload fast if they're gonna break the law anyway. Crazy ass evil-types determined to be law breakers have nothing but time on their hands. The Batman guy rigged his apartment all up with traps, they're just psychotic and have nothing better to do.
 
Last edited:
ivwshane said:
Lol, his post states the AWB had no affect, the report said it was hard to gauge and ranged from a small impact to none, that doesn't confirm what he said. I then explained why the results might have been what they were and suggested a new study without the law being handicapped.

But your ignorant ass can't read (must be the cataracts) and you aren't smart enough to add anything worthy to the discussion so my expectations aren't that high to begin with.

But hey! Thanks for your usual, add nothing to the discussion, comment. I'm sure everyone refreshes the screen waiting to see what your next witty retort might be./s
Click to expand...

many would argue that's equivalent to "no effect."

i would be interested in seeing an expanded study on crimes where magazines with greater than 10 round capacity magazines were used. since the study in the report was only limited to New Jersey, it would be interesting to see what nation-wide data would yield. If I had to guess, I would say the results would be similar.

you know, just to add more ammunition to the argument that an AWB is useless 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top