• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mars, One Explorer, One Way?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
ADDAvenger said:
The shortcoming of robots is they are pretty limited in their abilities, even one human can do many more things than a robot.
Click to expand...

If you're just looking at cost effectiveness, robotic probes trump humans by a very large margin. Even a human on a one way mission.
 
Printer Bandit said:
i'm amazed at all of the people that think we've never been to other planets before.
Click to expand...
Not_sure_if_serious.jpg
 
With only two people making children, someone's going to have to screw their brothers/sisters to keep going, and that never turns out good. Everyone on Mars will look like the citizens in Total Recall.
 
Why don't we just send all the Lifers on ATOT to mars?

Just don't run the life support system on Fusetalk. 😱
 
DrPizza said:
So, what is it that humans can do that a robot can't be built to do?
Click to expand...

Recall when the MROs scratched the dirt to reveal a white substance? There was much debate and discussion about whether or not it was water ice or something else. A human wouldn't need a complicated set of tests and hardware to determine if it was a frozen liquid or a rock. Humans can make judgments, deductions, and think on their feet. Even with the most sophisticated software available and the most expensive, high tech hardware that money can buy, a human can still the do the job better.

All the probes, orbiters, rovers, and landers that have been sent to Mars have had one ultimate goal, to determine what a manned mission would require to be successful. Future probes all expand and augment the capabilities of probes already there and of probes to be launched by other nations.
 
Fritzo said:
With only two people making children, someone's going to have to screw their brothers/sisters to keep going, and that never turns out good. Everyone on Mars will look like the citizens in Total Recall.
Click to expand...

For the last time, they are not there to breed. They are there to lay infrastructure and groundwork, as well as conduct research.
 
Bateluer said:
For the last time, they are not there to breed. They are there to lay infrastructure and groundwork, as well as conduct research.
Click to expand...

....c'mon. It'll happen. A little tipsy one night after breaking down some soil samples, one thing leads to another...
 
Last edited:
DesiPower said:
Even if they wont be able to breed, which, btw, is not they mail goal, they will still be able to "enjoy" each others company "more".
Click to expand...

Why would that matter? If you're purely looking at the sexual needs of them, then having all bi people offers no benefits over having straight (or gay for that matter) male/female teams.

FWIW I like your idea from a pure thought experiment, but in reality it does not matter if they are all bi or all straight/gay. I am sure I'll get flammed for saying this, but as long as they are all bi or all straight/gay that's what matters from sexual needs stance. The issue with mixing sexualities is that it can create unneeded stress and conflict in an already stressful situation.
 
Bateluer said:
Recall when the MROs scratched the dirt to reveal a white substance? There was much debate and discussion about whether or not it was water ice or something else. A human wouldn't need a complicated set of tests and hardware to determine if it was a frozen liquid or a rock. Humans can make judgments, deductions, and think on their feet. Even with the most sophisticated software available and the most expensive, high tech hardware that money can buy, a human can still the do the job better.

All the probes, orbiters, rovers, and landers that have been sent to Mars have had one ultimate goal, to determine what a manned mission would require to be successful. Future probes all expand and augment the capabilities of probes already there and of probes to be launched by other nations.
Click to expand...

It's cheaper, by a large degree, to just send another probe specifically to investigate the white stuff. And another to investigate whatever unusual thing turns up next. And it's not a terrible tragedy if a micrometeorite takes it out on the way there.

You get, I dunno, maybe one hundred or more missions doing things like this for one human mission.
 
DisgruntledVirus said:
Why would that matter? If you're purely looking at the sexual needs of them, then having all bi people offers no benefits over having straight (or gay for that matter) male/female teams.

FWIW I like your idea from a pure thought experiment, but in reality it does not matter if they are all bi or all straight/gay. I am sure I'll get flammed for saying this, but as long as they are all bi or all straight/gay that's what matters from sexual needs stance. The issue with mixing sexualities is that it can create unneeded stress and conflict in an already stressful situation.
Click to expand...

well... back to my original point, why are you sending a male and a female team? instead of two female or two male? for the sexual reason right?. Now the journey is loooong, something can happen to someone, so, then one will be left alone. Therefore, send 4, 2 M and 2 F, but them what happens if one of them die? IMHO they will be better off if they all were bi
/troll
 
DesiPower said:
well... back to my original point, why are you sending a male and a female team? instead of two female or two male? for the sexual reason right?. Now the journey is loooong, something can happen to someone, so, then one will be left alone. Therefore, send 4, 2 M and 2 F, but them what happens if one of them die? IMHO they will be better off if they all were bi
/troll
Click to expand...

Why not send all gay/lesbian then? 😛
 
Bateluer said:
Recall when the MROs scratched the dirt to reveal a white substance? There was much debate and discussion about whether or not it was water ice or something else. A human wouldn't need a complicated set of tests and hardware to determine if it was a frozen liquid or a rock. Humans can make judgments, deductions, and think on their feet. Even with the most sophisticated software available and the most expensive, high tech hardware that money can buy, a human can still the do the job better.

All the probes, orbiters, rovers, and landers that have been sent to Mars have had one ultimate goal, to determine what a manned mission would require to be successful. Future probes all expand and augment the capabilities of probes already there and of probes to be launched by other nations.
Click to expand...

The robots aren't doing this completely independently. If you were there, how are you going to determine if it's frozen liquid or a rock? You have visual information, ditto the guys sitting on earth looking at the images. What instrument are you going to use? Or, are you just going to take it indoors to your habitat & see if it melts?

But you're right - humans can make judgments, deductions, and think on their feet. God forbid something happens up there - Marvin Martian jumps out behind a rock pointing his Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator at the robot - and it takes a whole 8 minutes for the signal to get to Earth for a human to make judgments, deductions, and think & then the robot gets a set of instructions another 8 minutes later.

But again, what are the humans going to do up there? What are they going to actually accomplish that a robot can't for a fraction of the cost? Anything relying on our eyes can be accomplished with a rover and a few sets of eyes back here on Earth. Especially when instruments are required such as a microscope.
 
Last edited:
It's only because of leaps forward in automation that robots on Mars are useful at all. The it takes 24 minutes for someone on earth to see what the bot sees, tell it to do something about it, and see what happens. I mean imagine if your PC were like that; 24 minutes between loading a page, logging in, and seeing your bank statement. Productivity is incredibly low unless tasks are simple enough to be automated. At some point we'll want to move beyond testing rocks and driving from one crater to another and the complexity of tasks will move beyond what can be automated efficiently.

Also, robots are very purpose-built, which makes them very cost effective for what they do. But, if you want to do 20 different things, you send about 10 different robots, and that takes time. If you really want results quickly, robots aren't the way to go.
 
geno said:
Imagine being the only person in the history of man kind to ever set foot on another planet or to at least lay eyes upon it up close. To know you may very well be the first AND last. I think it would be an amazing experience, one way or not.
Click to expand...
True, but after you get over all that, you're alone on a red rock. Nothing to see there, you see one square foot of Mars, you've seen the whole thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top