Maroon 5, Matchbox 20

[Modeps]

Originally posted by: Mucman
Another thing... Some bands like to reproduce their album in concert and others don't. Some concert goers like to hear a complete replication of the album and some love to hear a completely different interpretation of the music. Just because a bad doesn't play it the way you want to hear it doesn't mean the band sucks live.

You can be a music enthusiast without being a music snob

Well, they sounded BAD, like that William Hung kid bad.

 

[Mucman]

Originally posted by: thomsbrain
numbers in band name = bad

Because a bands name is directory correlated with how good a band is :roll:

 

[Mucman]

Originally posted by: Modeps

Originally posted by: Mucman
Another thing... Some bands like to reproduce their album in concert and others don't. Some concert goers like to hear a complete replication of the album and some love to hear a completely different interpretation of the music. Just because a bad doesn't play it the way you want to hear it doesn't mean the band sucks live.

You can be a music enthusiast without being a music snob

Well, they sounded BAD, like that William Hung kid bad.

I saw them too, and I thought they sounded good. See, subjectivity at work folks!

 

[machintos]

I think Matchbox 20 and Maroon 5 are okay.
The pointless number, according to blink 182 is just a random number that you add to the end of your band name to make sure that there's not gonna be some other band on the other side of the world that you didn't know exist suing you.
In blink's case, there was a band in the UK with the name blink. That's why they added the 182 behind it.

 

[randomlinh]

i like em both. well, more matchbox 20. and whats wrong w/ numbers in their names? maroon5 I like maybe 5 songs from the album.

And no one can sound as bad as william hung.. ugh....