Mark Meadows voter fraud?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
MtnMan

MtnMan

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2004
9,367
8,711
136
This is the vast mountain estate where Trumps former Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows was registered to vote in the 2020 election.

1646847549109.png

This is a single wide trailer in the mountains of Macon County in Western North Carolina.

Voter registration records show Meadows listed the Scaly Mountain home as his address. The Macon County Board of Elections confirmed Meadows and his wife voted absentee that year using that address.

“He registered and his wife registered in an address that they had never lived in, and they signed their names under penalty of perjury,” said Dr. Chris Cooper, Madison Distinguished Professor of Political Science & Public Affairs and Director of the Public Policy Institute at Western Carolina University.

wlos.com

Is this the home Mark Meadows lived in during the 2020 election?

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is under scrutiny amid allegations he misrepresented his residency when he voted in the 2020 election. Caption: Voter fraud questions arise over Mark Meadows' residency claim in 2020 election. Heading into the General Election in November...
wlos.com wlos.com

The Asheville Citizen Times

www.citizen-times.com www.citizen-times.com

I can't wait to see him make the perp walk into the courthouse... or when pigs fly, which ever comes first.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: Captante, interchange, soundforbjt and 4 others
Dulanic

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,965
590
136
Man all this voter fraud is crazy! Too bad it''s all from the right.... I mean he should spend more time in jail than the 5 years in jail Crystal Mason got right?
 
UNCjigga

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,386
9,956
136
What’s weird about this is that he had no need to claim an address in that county to vote. He has a home elsewhere in NC and he wasn’t running for Congress so why he picked that address is beyond me.

I think the punishment would be (and should be) small but he definitely needs to explain himself to a county judge or whomever administers elections in that district.
 
Pens1566

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,438
10,879
136
UNCjigga said:
What’s weird about this is that he had no need to claim an address in that county to vote. He has a home elsewhere in NC and he wasn’t running for Congress so why he picked that address is beyond me.

I think the punishment would be (and should be) small but he definitely needs to explain himself to a county judge or whomever administers elections in that district.
Click to expand...

My understanding is that he sold his other previous NC residence and then only owned property in SC. So he had to find somewhere else in NC.


And yeah, there's no way that Meadows actually resided there. Zero. Zip. He wouldn't even drive on the road you need to get there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skyking and uclaLabrat
GodisanAtheist

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,112
9,366
136
The problem, outside of this just being completely ignored by certain news outlets, is this will be spun into "see how easy it is to 'voter fraud'" to reinforce the current narrative.

The target audience won't think "holy crap you literally have to own two homes to voter fraud and my ass can't even buy one"
 
trenchfoot

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,622
8,150
136
UNCjigga said:
What’s weird about this is that he had no need to claim an address in that county to vote. He has a home elsewhere in NC and he wasn’t running for Congress so why he picked that address is beyond me.

I think the punishment would be (and should be) small but he definitely needs to explain himself to a county judge or whomever administers elections in that district.
Click to expand...


Maybe it has something to do with how much property tax he's paying on the primary residence he's claiming that he lives in.

edit - Penn's post above got in seconds before mine, but I'll leave mine be anyhow.
 
MtnMan

MtnMan

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2004
9,367
8,711
136
I downloaded the current voter registration data for Macon County, NC.
They are both still registered in the county at the single wide trailer address.

His wife registered on 9/19/2020, he registered on 9/22/2020.

The mailing address, a PO Box in Skyland, NC, is actually part of Asheville, NC, which is in the 11 Congressional district which he represented before permanently attaching his mouth to Trumps ass. The district now represented by the shitstain Madison Cawthorn.

The below is voter registration data as of 3/5/2022 for Macon County, NC. There are just over 24,000 registered voters in the county.

1646862567278.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: skyking and Captante
UNCjigga

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,386
9,956
136
MtnMan said:
But just like Cawthorn's 89MPH speeding ticket, it will be reduced to "improper equipment."

The Asheville Citizen Times

www.citizen-times.com www.citizen-times.com
Click to expand...

Hehe, I had one of those back in my high school days. Got caught doing 84 in a 65 and lawyered up to get it reduced from reckless speeding to improper equipment and zero points on my license. Deputy didn’t even show up in court.
 
Sunburn74

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
He should be charged. Would be surprised if he does though given how justice is delivered in this country.
 
MtnMan

MtnMan

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2004
9,367
8,711
136
UNCjigga said:
Hehe, I had one of those back in my high school days. Got caught doing 84 in a 65 and lawyered up to get it reduced from reckless speeding to improper equipment and zero points on my license. Deputy didn’t even show up in court.
Click to expand...
While you also had a citation for driving with a revoked driver's license?
 
P

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,940
9,836
136
I have to say I don't understand why someone with a politically-sensitive career would take a comparatively large individual risk (of completely wrecking that career for good) for what would surely be a very small gain (two extra votes in a particular location) for their collective team.

I'm presuming that the workings of the (crazy) US voting system means that voting there carries more 'weight' than if they'd done so where they were more plausibly resident, but surely the benefit of just two votes can't be that significant, compared to what he has to lose?

Edit - it's actually the same kind of reason as to why it seems implausible an undocumented migrant would try and vote illegally. The highly-diluted benefit just doesn't seem worth the strongly individualised risk.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
pmv said:
I have to say I don't understand why someone with a politically-sensitive career would take a comparatively large individual risk (of completely wrecking that career for good) for what would surely be a very small gain (two extra votes in a particular location) for their collective team.

I'm presuming that the workings of the (crazy) US voting system means that voting there carries more 'weight' than if they'd done so where they were more plausibly resident, but surely the benefit of just two votes can't be that significant, compared to what he has to lose?
Click to expand...
I’m certain the reason is impunity, he thought nobody would care and if they did, what, are they going to prosecute a former congressman and WH chief of staff?

I hope the answer is ‘yes’, but I’m not sure it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: esquared and BlueWeasel
hal2kilo

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,673
12,006
136
UNCjigga said:
Hehe, I had one of those back in my high school days. Got caught doing 84 in a 65 and lawyered up to get it reduced from reckless speeding to improper equipment and zero points on my license. Deputy didn’t even show up in court.
Click to expand...
The main trick is to get a DUI reduced the reckless driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trenchfoot and Lezunto
P

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,940
9,836
136
fskimospy said:
I’m certain the reason is impunity, he thought nobody would care and if they did, what, are they going to prosecute a former congressman and WH chief of staff?

I hope the answer is ‘yes’, but I’m not sure it is.
Click to expand...

Yes, that subsequently occurred to me as the answer to my own question. It only makes sense if you add that factor - that he implicitly believed there was absolutely no chance there would be any penalty for him. Which seems to carry an implication as to what needs to happen now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lezunto and hal2kilo
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom