Mark Levin book signing - wow

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

OGOC

Senior member
Jun 14, 2013
312
0
76
I'd ask you if you wanted another cup of kool-aid but after the last few posts I'd say you drank it all;)
It's Orange Crush, actually.
They don't sound like anyone in congress I know, you know, if you go by their actual record.

They appreciate that you totally bought their BS lies they spew.
Just stop.

The Tea Party type people are called "radicals" for wanting to not automatically raise the debt ceiling every time and automatically put more debt onto your children.

The Republicans getting in Boehner's and other establishment Republicans' faces are called "radicals" for not towing the party line.

Those same "radicals" are then also often accused of "being in lockstep with their party to the detriment of the country" and other nonsense statements I see people make. Somehow, the same people having a civil war in the Republican Party are at the same time accused of only doing what's good for the party.

In this very thread, someone accuses Republicans of being "radical" for not wanting to start wars as much as they (and Democrats) did when Bush was in office. You'd think that'd be considered a good thing by most people.

This is the real BS. Not the stuff you pretend is "BS."

Every thing I listed in that post Obama has done the opposite. He's trashed The Constitution, wants to keep spending your children's money, is happy when bills pass so you can later find out what's in them, drone bombs Americans and little kids, bails out banks, bails out corporations and then they pay zero in tax, loves policing the world and shooting missiles at sovereign nations even on flimsy evidence, etc, etc.

I'll ask again. Who are the actual "radicals" in government?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,522
17,030
136
It's Orange Crush, actually.

Just stop.

The Tea Party type people are called "radicals" for wanting to not automatically raise the debt ceiling every time and automatically put more debt onto your children.

The Republicans getting in Boehner's and other establishment Republicans' faces are called "radicals" for not towing the party line.

Those same "radicals" are then also often accused of "being in lockstep with their party to the detriment of the country" and other nonsense statements I see people make. Somehow, the same people having a civil war in the Republican Party are at the same time accused of only doing what's good for the party.

In this very thread, someone accuses Republicans of being "radical" for not wanting to start wars as much as they (and Democrats) did when Bush was in office. You'd think that'd be considered a good thing by most people.

This is the real BS. Not the stuff you pretend is "BS."

Every thing I listed in that post Obama has done the opposite. He's trashed The Constitution, wants to keep spending your children's money, is happy when bills pass so you can later find out what's in them, drone bombs Americans and little kids, bails out banks, bails out corporations and then they pay zero in tax, loves policing the world and shooting missiles at sovereign nations even on flimsy evidence, etc, etc.

I'll ask again. Who are the actual "radicals" in government?


Let me know when you actually understand what the debt ceiling is because if you don't understand that then you probably arent worthy of have a conversation with.

Enjoy your orange crush;)
 

OGOC

Senior member
Jun 14, 2013
312
0
76
Let me know when you actually understand what the debt ceiling is because if you don't understand that then you probably arent worthy of have a conversation with.
Let me know when you post any posts of any depth in this thread.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,522
17,030
136
Let me know when you post any posts of any depth in this thread.

Why? You wouldn't understand it anyway. Again, go educate yourself and then maybe we can have a real conversation because right now the only depth you have provided has been your ability to recite talking points.
 

OGOC

Senior member
Jun 14, 2013
312
0
76
Why? You wouldn't understand it anyway. Again, go educate yourself and then maybe we can have a real conversation because right now the only depth you have provided has been your ability to recite talking points.

There's another two-sentence post of yours, saying nothing. You're really racking those up.
 

OGOC

Senior member
Jun 14, 2013
312
0
76
Lol! Irony!
Another useless post of yours. In multiple ways. One being that I have already written long posts in this thread stating and backing up my positions and opinions, while you have posted nothing of consequence. Only one post of yours in this thread could even be considered to be more than one level above troll level.
 

Dannar26

Senior member
Mar 13, 2012
754
142
106
Long Island has a population of 7,686,912 according to 2012 census. If it was 70% blue, which would be VERY blue, there'd still be 2306073 people who are red. Now lets claim that only half those are adults (which is a low estimate) and only 0.1% of them would be interested in a book signing, you'd still have over 1000 people.

Eh, cities are like 98% urban gang banger types itching for handouts. The other 2% are a mix of college students, hipsters, and the invariably democrat ruling class (wait, do any of them actually reside in the city?).

I was dating a girl in Philadelphia during the campaigning for the '08 elections. Obama shock troopers where on every street corner asking if you were registered to vote. There was this crazy black lady literally dressed in Obama lawn signs dancing on the median on broad street.

I would joke with my girlfriend about wearing a McCain shirt, and wondered how long I could survive in it.