- Jul 18, 2007
- 25
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: fredhe12
Don't criticize it...legalize it...yeah, yeah!
Actually, it's not that hard to get. Why fix it if it ain't broke.
Seriously though, I hate to make light of such a controversial topic, but it's a very complex social, economic and political issue. It's not as easy as saying, okay, it's legal now. Great strides have been made in making it accessible to those who benefit the most: people with debilitating pain from illness or disease. Even that is kind of a cluster, but at least it's a start.
Like I said, if you like to get high (and I do on occasion) it's not hard to acquire.
my 2 cents
I won't disagree with what you say, but lots of people still go to jail for it, that's the problem.
Even in California they are constantly raiding the pot clinics where people go to get their medicine legitimately.
Originally posted by: enthusiast24
Topic Title: Marijuana, Legalize It??
wuddya think?
Originally posted by: fredhe12
I won't disagree with what you say, but lots of people still go to jail for it, that's the problem.
Even in California they are constantly raiding the pot clinics where people go to get their medicine legitimately.
Yeah, you're right, and that's why I said it's a cluster. My brother in law had back surgery (spine fusion) and has tremendous pain from it. He went through all the proper channels to get his medical use card and nearly got caught up in one of those raids. The two clinics that he frequented both were shut down and now he's back to getting his herb from illegal sources. This is in San Diego where the local authorities have taken it upon themselves to challenge the state on this issue. I certainly empathize with those that really need it, but can't get it.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
I thought you were for freedom Dave? Doesn't the phrase "sin tax" go against the principles of freedom? Would you support a Republican sponsored tax on homosexuals? One man's desire is another man's sin. Literally.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: BoberFett
I thought you were for freedom Dave? Doesn't the phrase "sin tax" go against the principles of freedom? Would you support a Republican sponsored tax on homosexuals? One man's desire is another man's sin. Literally.
So you want free sex from a prostitute too. Forget the tax then and have the government sell weed directly to the consumer. They can take the money and do treatment for drug addiction. I for one am more than happy to pay for sin, I mean satisfying my desire and I always do, seems like, one way or the other. You don't value what you don't pay for. That's why they have a value added tax, no?
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
Originally posted by: fredhe12
I won't disagree with what you say, but lots of people still go to jail for it, that's the problem.
Even in California they are constantly raiding the pot clinics where people go to get their medicine legitimately.
Yeah, you're right, and that's why I said it's a cluster. My brother in law had back surgery (spine fusion) and has tremendous pain from it. He went through all the proper channels to get his medical use card and nearly got caught up in one of those raids. The two clinics that he frequented both were shut down and now he's back to getting his herb from illegal sources. This is in San Diego where the local authorities have taken it upon themselves to challenge the state on this issue. I certainly empathize with those that really need it, but can't get it.
Funny how the government wont let you use non-addictive and harmless MJ for chronic pain, but is perfectly OK with you taking highly addictive opiates. I guess thats what all the political contributions they receive from pharma companies gets you.
Originally posted by: enthusiast24
wuddya think?
Originally posted by: Aimster
no please no
it is obvious some members in here smoke excessive amounts of pot on a daily basis.
making it easier for them to obtain only leads to more non-sense threads
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Originally posted by: enthusiast24
wuddya think?
Yes, Legalize it. Then tax the daylights out of it.
Also, increase penalties for driving under the influence of it as well.
Do not make it a crime to grow your own.
Originally posted by: ericlp
Jeee, maybe we can tax alcohol and caffeine too at the same rate...
-snip-
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: ericlp
Jeee, maybe we can tax alcohol and caffeine too at the same rate...
-snip-
Where I live, we already have an alchohol tax.
But otherwise, it's just crazy to put pot smokers in prisons and tie up the court system and police depts.
IMO, it's long past due to decriminalize it (it remains "illegal" but there is no penalty like in Holland. Doing that let's you make the *official* statement that it's use is *bad*) or legalize and tax it.
I wish somebody would ask the Dem candidates that in a debate. I see no need to ask the Repubs. I know what their answer will be.
Fern
Originally posted by: sirjonk
As for mary jane, it is creeping its way towards legality, and hopefully the next generation will be able to take the steps this one couldn't.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
I thought you were for freedom Dave?
Doesn't the phrase "sin tax" go against the principles of freedom?
Would you support a Republican sponsored tax on homosexuals? One man's desire is another man's sin.
Literally.
Actually the last meaningful vote in the house of reps was pretty recent - late July I think. The Hinchey Amendment (ceasing funding of the DEA raids on med marijuana states) could have easily passed without even full democrat support, but alas the do-nothing dems are spineless as usual.Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: ericlp
Jeee, maybe we can tax alcohol and caffeine too at the same rate...
-snip-
Where I live, we already have an alchohol tax.
But otherwise, it's just crazy to put pot smokers in prisons and tie up the court system and police depts.
IMO, it's long past due to decriminalize it (it remains "illegal" but there is no penalty like in Holland. Doing that let's you make the *official* statement that it's use is *bad*) or legalize and tax it.
I wish somebody would ask the Dem candidates that in a debate. I see no need to ask the Repubs. I know what their answer will be.
Fern
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: BoberFett
I thought you were for freedom Dave?
Doesn't the phrase "sin tax" go against the principles of freedom?
Would you support a Republican sponsored tax on homosexuals? One man's desire is another man's sin.
Literally.
You're looking at it wrong as usual, big surprise.
I wasn't neccessarilly refering to "sin" as a Republican morality issue.
I was more refering to the medical problems associated with smoking in general which is why I included cigarettes.
You are free to kill yourself with smoking whatever you choose but put enough money into the kitty to pay for your medical expenses related to your killing yourself slowly.
