March 21 2010 Dawn of a New America

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,137
225
106
Probably not as many as your stupid ass 28K posts. Go get a life freak.
 

2Xtreme21

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2004
7,044
0
0
And once again, the Republicans are on the wrong side of history.

I also find it funny that people seem to care way more about fetuses than they do about the children once they're born into families with no health care coverage.

Also, can someone tell me what's wrong with this without quoting Faux News?
 

ranmaniac

Golden Member
May 14, 2001
1,940
0
76
glenn_beck_crying.png


Glenn Beck on tomorrow (or everyday).
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
And once again, the Republicans are on the wrong side of history.

I also find it funny that people seem to care way more about fetuses than they do about the children once they're born into families with no health care coverage.

Also, can someone tell me what's wrong with this without quoting Faux News?

Because we have a right to LIFE.. not healthcare.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
glenn_beck_crying.png


Glenn Beck on tomorrow (or everyday).

What are you talking about man? This news makes Glenn a happy little pig.

\now he gets to pump his rage boner even harder...
\\and make more cash off his viewers who eagerly await open mouthed for his glorious ejaculations....
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,138
6,373
136
So who gets the huge payday out of this? The numbers being tossed around are staggering, and whenever you have huge sums of money there is always huge amounts of payola. So which groups net the largest chunk, and what percentage of that is being kicked back as contributions?
A bunch of people have just become very rich, I'd like to know who.

Edit: Who is Glen Beck?
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally Posted by CADsortaGUY
Hopefully the courts will uphold the Constitution and rule this bill unconstitutional.

Hopefully they already have their bags packed

There's no reason for anyone to take you seriously...

McRetard.jpg
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
So who gets the huge payday out of this? The numbers being tossed around are staggering, and whenever you have huge sums of money there is always huge amounts of payola. So which groups net the largest chunk, and what percentage of that is being kicked back as contributions?
A bunch of people have just become very rich, I'd like to know who.
private insurance company board members?

they have no government competition, we still can't buy drugs from other countries, and several million people are now going to be forced to buy their product.

the bill does impact them in some ways (preexisting conditions), but I imagine that those costs will just be passed on to the consumer.
 
Last edited:

2Xtreme21

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2004
7,044
0
0
Because we have a right to LIFE.. not healthcare.

Lmao. Well thank the progressives for making sure you never have to see someone you deeply care for go into financial ruin or die due to them being deemed not worthy for life by the big businesses you support. (even though the competitive asshole in me really wishes you would have to deal with that.)
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Lmao. Well thank the progressives for making sure you never have to see someone you deeply care for go into financial ruin or die due to them being deemed not worthy for life by the big businesses you support. (even though the competitive asshole in me really wishes you would have to deal with that.)

Its good to know you wish harm on people though based on political views. I suspect most on the left are like you.

And the progressives in government aren't going to be under this plan.. what does that tell you?
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
November will be fun.


Bring it on. G/L with your pro-pre-existing conditions exclusions, pro-recision, pro-medical bankruptcies, pro-Medicare pt D donut hole, pro-deficit agenda.
Sounds like a winner.

Going to run on a "ban exclusions, but eliminate the Ins mandate" platform?

Ins co's are going to love that. Force them to cover the most expensive customers for all costs, but don't increase the risk pool? HA!
Now the wingnuts on the SCOTUS have eliminated corp donations limits, they can bury repubs who try to eliminate the bill. O, sweet irony!

#'s don't work anyhow, unless you raise premiums on the few customers you have through the roof. The mandate is the only realistic way it was going to work.

Either way, checkmate. A year of obstruction, distortion and lies and nothing to show for it.

A few seats may be lost, but not enough to overturn a veto. Activist conservative judges may even try to dismiss the will of Congress, but it will take years to move thru the courts. It took 8 years to overturn McCain-Fiengold. All provisions of the bill will be in fullforce, and no one will want to overturn them to go back to a time you could lose your HC just for being sick. We will just be debating the fixes to the inevitable weaknesses of this bill to further strengthen it by then.

Game over man.