• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Manual vs offset voltage

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Termie said:
DrBoss - I think the consensus is that this isn't good advice. But for a q6600 at 3.7, which is what TweakBoy has, it probably makes sense.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Sandy Bridge changes how people overclock. If you find someone who was skilled at socket 775 overclocking and who hasn't read up on Sandy Bridge overclocking, and hand him/her a Sandy Bridge setup to overclock, much gnashing of teeth would ensue.

tweakboy said:
Depends on user and their needs.
Click to expand...

Exactly! So, a user chasing benchmark numbers and super high clock speeds would probably do as you suggest.

EVERYONE ELSE who uses their machine day to day is better served with using offset and leaving EIST enabled.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top