Brovane
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2001
- 6,370
- 2,578
- 136
Some of the information is wrong in this video. In CA.50BMG rifles are in-deed illegal however you can legally posses one owned before the ban. However it isn't illegal for Law Enforcement agencies to own them or purchase them. What happened is that after the ban the most well known manufacturer of .50 BMG rifles Barrett firearms told all Law Enforcement agencies in CA they would no longer sell or service their rifles for any LE agency in CA. However other companies besides Barrett manufacturer .50 BMG rifles.
Also what isn't mentioned is that for Law Enforcement personnel in CA their are different rules/regulations for the purchase of "Assault Rifles" and other weapons than for a normal civilian. Even for their personnel use. Basically in CA a Law Enforcement person can purchase assault weapons for personnel use. I wondered if any of the Assault Weapons the gunman has acquired where purchased with the help of this exemption.
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/California-lawmen-own-thousands-of-assault-guns-2419283.php#page-1