Originally posted by: ForumMaster
frankly, i agree that the father should decide in this case since he has custody. but at that age, it's problematic. but circumcision is medically better for the body regardless of religion.
let the child decide. but most people today have it done as babies due to the medical benefits of it.
Many behavioral changes are "medically better." Outlaw soda/pop. Make fast food illegal. Ban all drugs. Mandate exercise regiments.
And of course, in terms of sexual health, stop having sex with the ONLY exception being procreation. Recreational sex is dangerous with all the STDs around.
You know what though? Certain behaviors just feel good, and may be detrimental. Foreskin has a LOT of nerve endings, and based in part on what Titandiddly said in his thread, it seems that losing it adversely affects feeling during sex. I'm kind of irritated that I was circumcised, but it seems that I didn't have much choice.
Another argument against circumcision: if a foreskin was really so bad as it's made out to be, evolution would have gotten rid of it a long time ago. If it caused so many infections, those with larger foreskins would have been more likely to die young, while those without or with smaller foreskins would have been more likely to procreate, thus passing on those genes. The fact that they still exist does indicate, at least somewhat, that the foreskin does serve a useful purpose, or if not that, then its presence is not overly detrimental.
The argument that the foreskin harbors bacteria: so does your mouth, but people still kiss. A human mouth is a grotesque bacterial funhouse. Once or twice-a-day cleaning seems to be sufficient. So I think that one shower a day should do the trick for cleanliness.