• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Man arrested for stealing own car

altonb1

Diamond Member
Text

BALTIMORE - Baltimore City police have a new crime on the books: Stealing your own car.


Just ask Keith Spence, a Baltimore City resident who was arrested when he was driving home from work in a car he bought with a tax refund.

?I couldn?t believe it was happening,? Spence said.

Spence, 28, said city police pulled him over in his 1993 red Cadillac Elderado coupe for a cracked rear window in February. Four officers dragged Spence and his two passengers from the car and said they were under arrest for stealing it, he said.

?I was listening to the radio from the back seat of the police car. It said a gray Cadillac sedan was stolen; mine is a red coupe. I guess the officer must have been color blind,? he said.

?I tried to tell them it was my car, but they wouldn?t listen.?

Spence and his two friends were arrested, and the car was impounded. Charged with one count of motor vehicle theft, Spence represented himself in court in June.

?I owned the car ? I knew it wasn?t stolen,? he said.

Even though Spence had the title proving he owned the car, he said he was cleared of the charges because of the testimony of the owner of the stolen car.

?The whole courtroom fell out ? even the judge laughed,? Spence told The Examiner.

Still, police sold Spence?s car at auction two months before his day in court.

Now Spence is without the car it took him a year to buy, and his lawyer, Roland Brown, said he is preparing to sue the city.

?Not only did the police violate my client?s constitutional rights by selling his car before the trial, but the case demonstrates that young black males in this city are blindly targeted by the Baltimore City police,? he said.

Brown said the case also points out problems with the city?s management of stolen vehicles. ?You have to question why a stolen car would be sold at all,? he said.

Police spokesman Matt Jablow said police are investigating the incident.

?We?re looking into the circumstances surrounding why the car was sold,? Jablow said.

Spence said he only wants the Cadillac he worked so hard to buy.

?I loved that car.?

 
holly crap.

ok red and grey are close i give the cop that (hahah yeah im stretching). but to auction the car before he was found guilty?

to bad he is only going to win a few thousand on it.
 
Originally posted by: altonb1
Text

BALTIMORE - Baltimore City police have a new crime on the books: Stealing your own car.


Just ask Keith Spence, a Baltimore City resident who was arrested when he was driving home from work in a car he bought with a tax refund.

?I couldn?t believe it was happening,? Spence said.

Spence, 28, said city police pulled him over in his 1993 red Cadillac Elderado coupe for a cracked rear window in February. Four officers dragged Spence and his two passengers from the car and said they were under arrest for stealing it, he said.

?I was listening to the radio from the back seat of the police car. It said a gray Cadillac sedan was stolen; mine is a red coupe. I guess the officer must have been color blind,? he said.

?I tried to tell them it was my car, but they wouldn?t listen.?

Spence and his two friends were arrested, and the car was impounded. Charged with one count of motor vehicle theft, Spence represented himself in court in June.

?I owned the car ? I knew it wasn?t stolen,? he said.

Even though Spence had the title proving he owned the car, he said he was cleared of the charges because of the testimony of the owner of the stolen car.

?The whole courtroom fell out ? even the judge laughed,? Spence told The Examiner.

Still, police sold Spence?s car at auction two months before his day in court.

Now Spence is without the car it took him a year to buy, and his lawyer, Roland Brown, said he is preparing to sue the city.

?Not only did the police violate my client?s constitutional rights by selling his car before the trial, but the case demonstrates that young black males in this city are blindly targeted by the Baltimore City police,? he said.

Brown said the case also points out problems with the city?s management of stolen vehicles. ?You have to question why a stolen car would be sold at all,? he said.

Police spokesman Matt Jablow said police are investigating the incident.

?We?re looking into the circumstances surrounding why the car was sold,? Jablow said.

Spence said he only wants the Cadillac he worked so hard to buy.

?I loved that car.?

Was waiting for the race card to be pulled. :disgust:
 
And the police will not be fired, because they have government jobs which last forever no matter how hard you fvck up.
 
Originally posted by: Syrch
bwhahahah that sucks and is funny at the same time

lol agreed. funny story but the police auctioning off his car just sucks. i'd be pissed
 
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
And the police will not be fired, because they have government jobs which last forever no matter how hard you fvck up.

i don't think they should be fired. retrained in colors maybe. i think my daughters pre-k class is going over it this semester maybe htey can join her.
 
red - 2 door
gray - 4 door

Look close to the same.

Just goes to show that all the paperwork in the world doesn't prove you own something. As guess he called himself as the owner to rightfully say that charges should be dropped against himself. 🙂
 
This may be a stupid question.

Why sell the car and not give the car back to the person/insurance company who it was stolen from? Then if the person/insurance company chooses to sell it, they can.
 
Originally posted by: toekramp
wtf, they can sell a car before the trial?

wtf, they sell a stolen car.. nevermind returning it to the owner, of which they still didn't believe was the person who was driving it, who happened to own it anyhow. so without 'knowing' the driver wasn't the owner, they sold it instead of trying to find the owner to return it to.

lmao they fail at being police officers.
 
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
And the police will not be fired, because they have government jobs which last forever no matter how hard you fvck up.

i don't think they should be fired. retrained in colors maybe. i think my daughters pre-k class is going over it this semester maybe htey can join her.

They're trained officers of the law. They didn't follow procedure, they detained a guy for a crime he didn't commit, and they sold the car before the trial. That's pretty serious...
 
Moral of the story: Get a title for the vehicle, next time.

Well, next time he can by a Lincoln Mark VII or VIII and get a real american luxury sport coupe.
 
Originally posted by: dullard
This may be a stupid question.

Why sell the car and not give the car back to the person/insurance company who it was stolen from? Then if the person/insurance company chooses to sell it, they can.

that is a good question. why did they even sale it? if it was stolen why not give it to the rightfull owner? well maybe because the owner was beign charged for theift of the vehicle and they did not want to admit they fvcked up.

i am still amazed that it even got to court. all paperwork said grey vehicle and he was driving a red one. not to mention couldnt they fricken look at the vin number?

more i think about it the more i get the cops fvcked up and tried to covor it up.
 
Originally posted by: destrekor
Originally posted by: toekramp
wtf, they can sell a car before the trial?

wtf, they sell a stolen car.. nevermind returning it to the owner, of which they still didn't believe was the person who was driving it, who happened to own it anyhow. so without 'knowing' the driver wasn't the owner, they sold it instead of trying to find the owner to return it to.

lmao they fail at being police officers.

🙂 It's okay to fail at a government job, you're not competing with anybody.

If I stole something while I was at work, I certainly wouldn't be able to keep my job.
 
I hope he pwns that city. That's just fscking STUPID. The cops that pulled him over should be FIRED with a captial F, I, R, E, and possibly even a D.
 
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
Moral of the story: Get a title for the vehicle, next time.

.

Even though Spence had the title proving he owned the car, he said he was cleared of the charges because of the testimony of the owner of the stolen car.



 
Back
Top