Originally posted by: touchmyichi
Leinart-
I think the "no arm strength" is BS. He's been a fantastic quarterback in an NFL style offense at USC, how about that final ND play or nearly carrying a team to a threepeat (and by the way he was great up until the end of rose bowl). And now he finds himself in an even better position at Arizona under the teaching of Kurt Warner and an explosive array of offensive weapons available to him. I predict Leinart to be a superb NFL quarterback in 2 or 3 years.
Originally posted by: Accipiter22
Cutler will be horrid. He won 11 games in college. Don't give me the 'oooh but his team was crappy' if he's so good why didn't he raise the level of the team? Best case scenario he's the next jake plummer. Young will be a poor man's vick. Leinert will be good, but leave the NFL in less than a decade, there's been a worry among NFL teams that he was going to go to a screen career after just a few years in the NFL....his agents are steering him that way too...especially after he dropped in the draft
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: Doboji
My money is on Jay Cutler... I think Cutler is a long term solid producer... sort of in the neighborhood of a Drew Bledsoe or a Matt Hassleback
followed by Vince Young... I see Vince Young in a Steve Mcnair type light...
followed by Kellen Clemens... I see this guy being an on again off again solid player... a Gus Ferotte type
There were no Mannings, Favres Bradys Montanas etc in this draft...
Are you insane? Jay Cutler won't play a down in his first couple of years, Jake Plummer is in Denver, going to Pro Bowls and winning. Your question is over the next three years...it's gotta be Matt Leinart. He's playing with two pro bowl recievers and a pro bowl running back, with a revamped offensive line. That offense is going to be ridiculous next year.
As I said in my prior post, youd don't know that. Lots of things can happen where Cutler gets to play. He could also be traded right away and play for anther team (just another scenerio I didn't already list)
Originally posted by: Deeko
Leinart, Leinart, Leinart. Not only is he the most talented & most experienced, he has by FAR the best supporting offense. Leinart, edge, boldin, and fitzgerald is just nasty.
Vince Young is so overrated. He's a slower Michael Vick. Sure, he's taller, but big deal. He'll never be a great passing QB.
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Deeko
Leinart, Leinart, Leinart. Not only is he the most talented & most experienced, he has by FAR the best supporting offense. Leinart, edge, boldin, and fitzgerald is just nasty.
Vince Young is so overrated. He's a slower Michael Vick. Sure, he's taller, but big deal. He'll never be a great passing QB.
OH MY GOD!!!
Aren't you the one always going on about how great Vick is?????
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Deeko
Leinart, Leinart, Leinart. Not only is he the most talented & most experienced, he has by FAR the best supporting offense. Leinart, edge, boldin, and fitzgerald is just nasty.
Vince Young is so overrated. He's a slower Michael Vick. Sure, he's taller, but big deal. He'll never be a great passing QB.
OH MY GOD!!!
Aren't you the one always going on about how great Vick is?????
I think Michael Vick has the ability to develop into a great quarterback, yes. In addition to being far faster than Young (which is what makes him so dangerous), he also throws the ball very hard, and with near-perfect mechanics. Get him someone other than Alge Crumpler to throw to, and yes, I do think Vick can still develop into a great QB.
Young, on the otherhand, is slower, stupider, and mechanically worse. The ONLY advantage is his height.
Originally posted by: Shlong
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Deeko
Leinart, Leinart, Leinart. Not only is he the most talented & most experienced, he has by FAR the best supporting offense. Leinart, edge, boldin, and fitzgerald is just nasty.
Vince Young is so overrated. He's a slower Michael Vick. Sure, he's taller, but big deal. He'll never be a great passing QB.
OH MY GOD!!!
Aren't you the one always going on about how great Vick is?????
I think Michael Vick has the ability to develop into a great quarterback, yes. In addition to being far faster than Young (which is what makes him so dangerous), he also throws the ball very hard, and with near-perfect mechanics. Get him someone other than Alge Crumpler to throw to, and yes, I do think Vick can still develop into a great QB.
Young, on the otherhand, is slower, stupider, and mechanically worse. The ONLY advantage is his height.
Actually Vick has horrible foot mechanics (thats why Falcons brought in Musgrave), he has a great cannon arm though (strongest in NFL, flick of the wrist & it flies). I think Vick should improve this upcoming year in the passing game but next year is the year I think he breaks out.
Originally posted by: Doboji
My money is on Jay Cutler... I think Cutler is a long term solid producer... sort of in the neighborhood of a Drew Bledsoe or a Matt Hassleback
followed by Vince Young... I see Vince Young in a Steve Mcnair type light...
followed by Kellen Clemens... I see this guy being an on again off again solid player... a Gus Ferotte type
There were no Mannings, Favres Bradys Montanas etc in this draft...
Originally posted by: Deeko
I think Michael Vick has the ability to develop into a great quarterback, yes. In addition to being far faster than Young (which is what makes him so dangerous), he also throws the ball very hard, and with near-perfect mechanics. Get him someone other than Alge Crumpler to throw to, and yes, I do think Vick can still develop into a great QB.
Young, on the otherhand, is slower, stupider, and mechanically worse. The ONLY advantage is his height.
Originally posted by: Deeko
I've compared the numbers before, but A) Vick left college after only two years, Young played three, who is to say what Vick would have done in a junior season and B) Both of them were great COLLEGE quarterbacks, but we all know that doesn't have to translate to the NFL. Considering that Young is dumb as a brick and throws half retarded, I am rather confident that he will bomb at the NFL level.
"I thought he did a nice job with everything from the huddle, to breaking the huddle, to getting under center, the cadences, the snap counts and the concepts we have him," Fisher said. As for throwing the ball, Young impressed the coaches. "This morning we threw one-on-one, and he completed four consecutive deep balls to receivers he'd never thrown to before," Fisher said. "That's a good sign because he's able to adjust and able to adjust real easily." Young's new teammates, many of whom had only seen him perform on television before Friday, were already impressed. "The ball was right there, and that's all a receiver can ask for," said receiver Jonathan Orr, a sixth-round pick from Washington. "I was impressed like everybody else."
Originally posted by: Accipiter22
Cutler will be horrid. He won 11 games in college. Don't give me the 'oooh but his team was crappy' if he's so good why didn't he raise the level of the team? Best case scenario he's the next jake plummer. Young will be a poor man's vick. Leinert will be good, but leave the NFL in less than a decade, there's been a worry among NFL teams that he was going to go to a screen career after just a few years in the NFL....his agents are steering him that way too...especially after he dropped in the draft
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Shlong
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Deeko
Leinart, Leinart, Leinart. Not only is he the most talented & most experienced, he has by FAR the best supporting offense. Leinart, edge, boldin, and fitzgerald is just nasty.
Vince Young is so overrated. He's a slower Michael Vick. Sure, he's taller, but big deal. He'll never be a great passing QB.
OH MY GOD!!!
Aren't you the one always going on about how great Vick is?????
I think Michael Vick has the ability to develop into a great quarterback, yes. In addition to being far faster than Young (which is what makes him so dangerous), he also throws the ball very hard, and with near-perfect mechanics. Get him someone other than Alge Crumpler to throw to, and yes, I do think Vick can still develop into a great QB.
Young, on the otherhand, is slower, stupider, and mechanically worse. The ONLY advantage is his height.
Actually Vick has horrible foot mechanics (thats why Falcons brought in Musgrave), he has a great cannon arm though (strongest in NFL, flick of the wrist & it flies). I think Vick should improve this upcoming year in the passing game but next year is the year I think he breaks out.
I'm talking his arm mechanics. He throws the "prettiest" ball in the NFL, and really with how strong his arm is, he doesn't HAVE to have perfect foot mechanics, although it certainly would help.
A lot of people forget how young he is, too. Vick may have been in the NFL for awhile, but he is only 6 months older than Eli Manning. I'll admit (because I'm sure the Kevs of the world, who are in for a VERY disappointing season by the way) I was wrong in my assessment that last year would be his breakout year, but I still believe he will have one, be it this year or next year.
Originally posted by: z42
I'm going to go with Vince Young. The guy is tough and accurate and will make things happen with his feet when all else fails.
Leinart = Todd Marinovich. Have you guys actually watched USC play? All of his "great" passes occur after about 7 secs in the pocket. The guy played great in college, don't get me wrong, but he is not going to make it in the NFL IMO. He has good touch, but his decision making is a little slow and he floats his passes too much.